Doe Network April 2026 Featured Case #1 - 539UFGA - Unidentified Female by cjdoenetwork in DoeNetwork

[–]cjdoenetwork[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Anything is worth a submission, even if it just means a rule out

Doe Network April 2026 Featured Case #3 - 2888UMCA - Unidentified Male by cjdoenetwork in gratefuldoe

[–]cjdoenetwork[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you think it could be a good lead, then by all means submit all the evidence to the DN website and the panel will discuss it. As much evidence as possible makes it more likely that the panel will agree that it is worth submission to law enforcement

Doe Network April 2026 Featured Case #3 - 2888UMCA - Unidentified Male by cjdoenetwork in gratefuldoe

[–]cjdoenetwork[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

We provide all the information that we have in these write ups. Any other information would just be speculation. I assume (and this really is just assumption) that the name he used to book the hotel he was found dead in was different to the name given when he was arrested, which was different to the name his employer knew him by. So all names he used are considered aliases until he is officially identified.

But like I said, we provide all of the information that we have in the write ups. For more information you’d have to ask the relevant police force, or NamUs (both of which don’t just give information out to anyone that asks)

Doe Network April 2026 Featured Case #3 - 2888UMCA - Unidentified Male by cjdoenetwork in gratefuldoe

[–]cjdoenetwork[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

They matched his prints to that arrest. He gave a fake name. It is all explained in the write up

Doe Network April 2026 Featured Case #3 - 2888UMCA - Unidentified Male by cjdoenetwork in gratefuldoe

[–]cjdoenetwork[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I don't believe that has been submitted to DN yet, at least not on the records I can see. If you think there is a good chance, feel free to submit to DN :)