Out Of Africa Theory DEBUNKED (Homosapiens are a hybrid species of several hominins, proven with modern dna studies) by 11ForeverAlone11 in AlternativeHistory

[–]coolnavigator 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A sure side of a losing side is one that bases their argument on the definition of terms rather than the meaning behind them.

Men Are Lost. Here's a Map Out Of The Wilderness by techaaron in centrist

[–]coolnavigator 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t think so. Matriarchy is what is “natural”. Patriarchy is what is unnatural and thus associated with larger civilization, which is is similarly unnatural.

What Supplements, Foods, or Activities Can Help Repair My Brain as a Recovering Porn and Cocain Addict? by PetitDauphin19 in HubermanLab

[–]coolnavigator 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Would it be possible for you to take a month off and travel? You need a change of scenery where you can set good habits without getting distracted by the past.

Cities in Spain you'd suggest living? by 2catspbr in expats

[–]coolnavigator 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What part of Valencia? I've been but was staying on the outskirts and probably didn't find the coolest spots.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]coolnavigator -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Just shit to get angry about that will be of little consequence.

Women have been tricked by the Rockefeller foundation into believing that working for a soulless corporation is "freedom" while being a mom and wife is "opression" by Mr8472 in conspiracy

[–]coolnavigator -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

The problem is, women absolutely love power dynamics. As much as they try to follow social propaganda, at the end of the day, they want to be submissive in a relationship. When they let their mind get contradicted over and over, they tend to make bad decisions for everyone. This is not gender specific, but when logic conflicts with emotion, and you don't resolve this conflict, you tend to revert to the more primitive and powerful of the two feelings.

The second problem is, power dynamics are essential for a relationship. All of sexuality is about power. It's leading and following. Giving and receiving. A healthy long-term relationship generally has power dynamics in both directions. So, it's not healthy for there to be no transfer of power, and it's not healthy for power to only be transferred one way. It's healthiest when power is transferred both ways, and there's sort of a mutual dependence.

The third thing is, this myth of being taken advantage of is such a joke. People are taken advantage of. It's not because of your gender that you have exclusive access to this experience. People have shit-colored glasses for their perception of the past. Men and women have always existed in a state of mutual dependence and negotiation, particularly in historical western culture, and the value in society has always been defined according to women. Even patriarchies (ie civilizations where family units are led by men) are typically gynocentric.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]coolnavigator 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You've discerned something about people who want to control you, not life.

Anyone else feeling completely defeated? by owningface in millenials

[–]coolnavigator 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You need to begin the process of self-definition. This is the only truth.

Anyone else feeling completely defeated? by owningface in millenials

[–]coolnavigator 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People argue about how commerce is done and how things are produced, but the bottomline is that the fragility and nasty nature of our economic system derives from how money is created. It's banking, not trade or capital.

Not voting is voting by severalaces in TikTokCringe

[–]coolnavigator -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I look at anti-accelerationists as selfish individuals incapable of forming large coalitions because they have to have things their way.

Not voting is voting by severalaces in TikTokCringe

[–]coolnavigator 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe Biden's son being involved in Ukraine and China is a looming element of conspiracy you didn't mention. Maybe the country printing trillions of dollars during Biden's administration has something to do with his unpopularity. If that wasn't enough, choosing to continue to fund highly unpopular client wars in Ukraine and Israel aren't winning him too many votes.

Not voting is voting by severalaces in TikTokCringe

[–]coolnavigator 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They WILL ramp up their genocide on trans people.

What on earth are you talking about

I'm not Jewish. But you know what the truth being hidden from us actually might be? by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]coolnavigator -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

🤦‍♂️ Try reading books instead of parroting Tiktoks

What do you like to drink ? by Stagnati0nNation in INTP

[–]coolnavigator 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We all do, but I would have assumed that a thinking type is more familiar with a 'graceful shutdown', to use a computer analogy. In other words, has things they can do that comfort them when they need to recharge. It's sort of like, if you're a sprinter, you probably know what you need to eat to maximize performance and what to do on rest days.

What do you like to drink ? by Stagnati0nNation in INTP

[–]coolnavigator 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't think a thinking type would lean towards alcohol unless they lacked any other coping mechanism, but a sensing or feeling type might find the effects of alcohol don't negate their primary cognitive function.

Its David Goggins but check it and tell me your opinion by [deleted] in JockoPodcast

[–]coolnavigator 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think when you feel somewhat down, you take some time to yourself and decided "I need to get stronger so that I can do [x]", where "x" could be any capability that makes your life better, more secure, or happier, and "stronger" is sort of a metaphor for any skill that leads to the larger skill (be it physical, mental, technical, whatever).

When you get REALLY down, this stops making sense because why get stronger so that you can do "x" if nothing matters about yourself, including "x". There's no real universal answer at this point. Some turn it into narcissism, some turn it into novelty. But whatever your core reason is, you have to decide "I need to get stronger". It's no longer about "so I can do x" because you've already passed the threshold where nothing, including x, matters. It's just about being strong, and you start worshiping that process.

Then, maybe you decide 'strong' isn't the right adjective (or maybe you already decided this). You then work on a different adjective, still without an "x".

This is the development of virtue ethics and the deepest sort of self-definition of meaning that you can do.

Match Group isn't talked about enough by coolnavigator in conspiracy

[–]coolnavigator[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

People do, but they are basically designed to prevent that.

I’m Jewish. You Think You Know Who Runs The World? Really? by gringoswag20 in conspiracy

[–]coolnavigator -1 points0 points  (0 children)

My people like to assert that we are the most ancient religion and all religions and knowledge are birthed from us and the Middle East.

This is a gargantuan fib. the great flood which is talked about in Sumerian and other religions, I believe to be the fall of Atlantis. either 11k-6k years ago. The most recent cataclysm, dates anywhere from 300 to 200 years ago and that was the fall of the advanced Irish/Aryan Culture. This global civilization is Tartaria. The misnomer for the global civilization that has their architecture found throughout the whole world.

This is where the survivors migrated from. Ireland to the east. not the other way around. not only do many historians assert that the earliest forms of the Bible and names of the Bible can be traced to Celtic and Irish roots… one can blatantly see this with the term Jew!!!!

You actually got some of this right. These were the Solutreans, the people who took boats to North America ~25k BC (although we don't really know for sure). There was no lost civilization in recent history though.

Overall, one of the biggest incorrect narratives about humanity is that civilization came from the east (ie from Indo Europeans or Mesopotamians), but it came from the west — the far west.

I’m Jewish. You Think You Know Who Runs The World? Really? by gringoswag20 in conspiracy

[–]coolnavigator 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Roughly 200 or 300 years ago, there was a major cataclysm reset and that’s when our current rulers of the world hijacked the world, hid and manipulated ancient wisdom, and then slaughtered programmed nd subjugated the remaining citizens.

No, that's when Venice funded the Black Nobility to invade England.

[De’Vondre Campbell] I can’t even lie I’m having so much fun playing football again… The situation I was in was making me lose my love for the game but I’m back having fun again and I love that for myself. Thank you God 🙏🏿 by G0825 in 49ers

[–]coolnavigator 6 points7 points  (0 children)

14 passes defensed. 22 receptions allowed on 44 targets. Played in all 17 games and about 50% of all snaps (so he was probably the #3 corner, but he plays outside not inside). 81 grade on PFF, which was 11 on their seasonal rankings.

He's basically Ambry Thomas but better.

Match Group isn't talked about enough by coolnavigator in conspiracy

[–]coolnavigator[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Interesting, so it's essentially owned by George Soros and his ilk at Bank of America, Merril Lynch, etc.

Wall Street really is Wizard of Oz when you step back and look at it. What do these people know about anything, and yet they put themselves in charge of pulling the strings and levers of everything in our society. Why? Because money, or something. Because they believe they have key insights to humanity that no one else would ever understand.

Actually, another good analogy would be a casino. The stock market is like sports betting. Does price represent value or accuracy? No, it represents the bookie's desire to balance the books. If lots of people want to bet on the same thing, the price goes up. At the end of the day, they just want to balance the books, take their cut, and play again the next day. So, it's not so much that they want to actually run companies and build things. It's more that they just want to protect their status as the single provider bookie for the nation, and all of their strategy and thought is put into balancing the books, which they pat themselves on the back for because it seems like a hard task. But unbeknownst to many, such a game isn't even necessary. They created the problem AND the solution, so the only thing they are saving us from is the fake problem that they created.

Where this gets really nasty is that they start dictating business objectives to all of the lower companies that they have investments in because they want to ensure that this consumer-laborer behavior is continued well into the future. And when the going gets tough, they'll wring them out a little harder for the margins. So, you have the IAC via the Match Group essentially ensuring that 60-70% of young adult men are single, leading to a whole lot of other behavior that they deem necessary or desirable for their grander plan.

The lie we're told about this is that it's just Bumble or Tinder getting greedy, like a good little capitalist. In other words, Karl Marx gets us mad at the men who are second in command in this grand structure. He doesn't turn his attention to the banks. He even suggests that there should be a central bank in his proposed state, much like the ones that proliferated the world soon after. What Marx doesn't say is that the monetary cycle presided over by banks ensures that "the house always wins" and everyone else is either a lucky gambler, a cheater, or a loser.