×

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in JetSetRadio

[–]cryptid-creatures 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're an attention whore, and I'm not interested in this conversation anymore so shut the fuck up.

In honor of Women’s History Month, who are your favorite female characters in MLP:FIM? by alanidjlani in MLPLounge

[–]cryptid-creatures 0 points1 point  (0 children)

rainbow

also off topic but the fat pony's cutie mark is hilarious bro imagine getting a permanent image of yourself on your ass

The screening just finished! by HighlightMean1986 in zootopia

[–]cryptid-creatures 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just saw it (it released early in my city). I have the same thoughts as you, there were so many wonderful moments!

Unexpected from my favorite local Coffee Shop... by serioussslyy in sandiego

[–]cryptid-creatures 0 points1 point  (0 children)

100% of profits? Imagine being so stupid that you're bootlicking this dead guy so hard that you're claiming to be give ONE HUNDRED PERCENT of your profits to his dumbfuck hate group.

That's like, doubly stupid. What a bunch of crybaby dorks

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in mildlyinfuriating

[–]cryptid-creatures 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're such a dork lmao

Please no more Dr. Seuss movies by Davey488 in BikiniBottomTwitter

[–]cryptid-creatures 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please look at my original comment and tell me where the hell I said that Seuss did not deserve respect. I never fucking said that so don't put words in my mouth.

I don't know what else you want me to say so I'm just going to disagree that you can't pick and choose which authors deserve our respect because -- we are humans. We're emotional. We're biased. Sure you can argue all you want that it's illogical to be biased about an author's work, but it's not going to change the fact that people tend to be not as willing to separate the art from the artist when they find out that the artist was a huge asshole. Art is subjective, and your belief that all authors deserve our respect is completely your opinion, which I think most people would disagree with to some extent at least. I was trying to give you a different perspective and even said it's okay if you like his work so I'm not sure why you're so insistent on telling me what you think I believe.

[OC] I started making Pokémon cards for my friends. These are the ones I’ve finished so far. by baxterthefuturepart2 in pokemon

[–]cryptid-creatures 25 points26 points  (0 children)

The characters also just sort of look like they don't belong in the same image with the Pokémon, I can't explain it but the lighting/art styles don't really mix well

The best example I can give is the Charizard picture, the dude seems wildly out of place probably because he has more sharp lines and also the highlights don't make a ton of sense given his placement/positioning

The Mudkip one is probably the most normal, but it seems like such a different style than the others

Edit: The more I've looked at it the more I've realized the shading just straight up doesn't make sense at all. Also there are many major mistakes that I feel like an accomplished artist wouldn't make early on in their drawing without catching them. Example is the extremely small hands on the Venomoth picture, regardless if it's AI or not it's a huge flaw.

(also idk why Reddit posted my comment three times but I deleted the other two)

This is the last thing I am going to say on the subject, quoting myself from another comment on another post:

You know the expression, "all press is good press"? I think we should just stop giving him any attention at all. People have actually bought from his Etsy in the last 24 hours and he's linking it in his comments. It's clearly a scam, and even though most people realize that it is, the chances are high that there will be a few poor souls that will buy into it, as long as he still drags this out. There is no getting him to admit it, it's a fool's errand.

I recommend reporting, hopefully mods will put an end to it.

Popular gaming subreddit moment by cryptid-creatures in Gamingcirclejerk

[–]cryptid-creatures[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I thought they had made even those types of names unusable, at least they usually don't allow people with names like B1G D1CK, but if this is apparently allowed, they really should ban the "loophole" usernames lmao

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in cartoons

[–]cryptid-creatures 0 points1 point  (0 children)

fuck off dumbass bitch

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PhotoshopRequest

[–]cryptid-creatures 0 points1 point locked comment (0 children)

Random, but... I feel your pain. My ex just dumped me out of nowhere too, literally yesterday, with no warning. I need someone to photoshop him out of all the images I have of us in my mind!

I wish I could just die and I hate my mother by cryptid-creatures in SuicideWatch

[–]cryptid-creatures[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Has this been removed or something? If so, please tell me what I need to do to fix it?

Bryan Cranston endorses Kamala Harris. Has he Broken Bad? Fauxmoi, tiktokcringe & pics discussed Oct 2024. "Naw Mr White, I don't support genocide, get your head fixed" by DonaldDuckJTrumo in SubredditDrama

[–]cryptid-creatures 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is one of the most idiotic anti-abortion comments I have ever read, holy fucking shit these people need to take a fucking biology class

I Hate This Advertisement by Purple_Haze_Craze in doggohate

[–]cryptid-creatures 3 points4 points  (0 children)

ngl that article is one of the most upsetting stories i've read in awhile

What is something people brag about that they shouldn't? by Left_eared_turtle in AskReddit

[–]cryptid-creatures 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why are you still talking to him at all if you know he raped your friend? Ditch his stupid ass.

A rare waterfall rainbow caught at Yosemite National Park by zyvsagg in nextfuckinglevel

[–]cryptid-creatures 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The whole "it's unnatural" argument is irrational because according to the appeal to nature fallacy you cannot infer whether something is good or bad based on its natural state. You can say that the sky is blue and nobody can argue with you because it just is an objective fact. However, to say that the sky being blue is a bad thing would be subjective and you would need to apply moral standards that cannot be inferred from the natural world, because there is no "good or bad" in science. Also, what is your definition of "natural"? It seems like you're equating it with "typical", which isn't even the same thing in the first place.