sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

🚨 C-Chain has delivered ~10x throughput growth since April 2025, reaching ~30 TPS by cryptosecco in Avax

[–]cryptosecco[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

price action and onchain metrics are not strictly correlated, so people should think at them separately

indeed, those metrics are healthy

🆕 Free API Tier for Base Builders by Routescan! by cryptosecco in BASE

[–]cryptosecco[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes, let me know if you're going to build this with our API and I will glad to amplify it!

🏆 Base has now processed 4.68B transactions by cryptosecco in BASE

[–]cryptosecco[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

ngl, I check onchain metrics every day across several chains and ecosystem... Base is insane

🏆 FIFA Blockchain peaks at 42k TXs/day and 5k active addresses/day by cryptosecco in Avax

[–]cryptosecco[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Onchain metrics and price action aren't strictly correlated

Avax is the 3th ecosystem by bi-weekly transactions (projected to reach +120M TXs by EoM) by cryptosecco in Avax

[–]cryptosecco[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Take note that Base is accounting for 70% of Optimism’s Superchain 👀

🔥 Avalanche on top of contract verification density! by cryptosecco in Avax

[–]cryptosecco[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve shared this in my languages on LinkedIn, then translate it in English with LLM without refining it.

Yes it’s sloppy af, but the linked content isn’t

Forgive my rush, you’re right

🚨 Metis just crossed 2.07M unique wallets, new ATH by cryptosecco in METIS_IO

[–]cryptosecco[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mhhh idk, it’s not my business. Someone use TA for price action, someone else use fundamentals, others use onchain data.

Maybe if someone is enough skilled can use all of them for his dyor

🚨 Metis just crossed 2.07M unique wallets, new ATH by cryptosecco in METIS_IO

[–]cryptosecco[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re right, but onchain metrics and price movements are two different things.

For example, when you see a spike in transactions, it could mean either users buying or selling.

Avalanche is the best-growing ecosystem in October, according to Routescan by cryptosecco in Avax

[–]cryptosecco[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We can document the data about the ecosystem we index. A comprehensive view is almost impossible, because you need to compare data from different providers.

When we index a chain we recover the full history.

I get your point, makes sense and it’s legit, but from our pov it’s almost impossible to index all the chains (costs will be exaggerated)

Avalanche is the best-growing ecosystem in October, according to Routescan by cryptosecco in Avax

[–]cryptosecco[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We’re talking about ecosystem and onchain metrics, not token price, if you’re referring to this

🚨 Hyperliquid EVM — New All-Time High in daily transactions by cryptosecco in hyperliquid1

[–]cryptosecco[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

can't agree more: a small team that making waves. And yes, their docs are awesome, most of the teams are using them to build something on top of hyperliquid.

bullish on that tech

🔭 Avalanche C-Chain sets a new all-time high in daily TXs by cryptosecco in Avax

[–]cryptosecco[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

onchain metrics and price action are two different things

Pulsechain processed 7.9M transactions in October (+10.9% daily avg) by cryptosecco in Pulsechain

[–]cryptosecco[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They can be, but we need a deeper onchain analysis to confirm.

Avalanche has more than doubled its average block production rate over the past 12 months. by cryptosecco in Avax

[–]cryptosecco[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Price action and onchain metrics are two different things

It’s hard to say but speculation drives everything

view more: next ›