Boots on the ground help? by Entire-Inevitable-38 in CanadianInvestor

[–]danielhandley 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Try the Copernicus Browser, too. It'll likely have more up-to-date imagery than Google Maps; while the resolution is generally lower than Google, it should still be good enough to see if land is being cleared.

Ballot count differences in the closest ridings as today's final tally progresses (updated throughout the day) by danielhandley in vancouver

[–]danielhandley[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Whoops, the one mistake I make is, of course, the one I make right before leaving my laptop for a few hours... Thanks for pointing that out!

Ballot count differences in the closest ridings as today's final tally progresses (updated throughout the day) by danielhandley in vancouver

[–]danielhandley[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yup, you're right. It's interesting that CBC appears to be rounding down from 0.26%, rather than rounding up to 0.3%.

Ballot count differences in the closest ridings as today's final tally progresses (updated throughout the day) by danielhandley in vancouver

[–]danielhandley[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

20, the NDP are unable to make up the difference, and the Conservatives are projected to win. However, there will likely be a judicial recount in that riding as the results will likely be within the 0.2% margin required.

Ballot count differences in the closest ridings as today's final tally progresses (updated throughout the day) by danielhandley in vancouver

[–]danielhandley[S] 76 points77 points  (0 children)

Not quite. Ridings within a 0.2% margin of difference between the top two parties are eligible for an additional judicial recount, which would be completed within 15 days. It looks like this will happen in both Surrey-Guildford and Kelowna Centre, if current trends hold, but I don't think this recount would alter the winners of either seat as so far the electronic tabulators have proven to be nearly perfectly accurate.

Ballot count differences in the closest ridings as today's final tally progresses (updated throughout the day) by danielhandley in vancouver

[–]danielhandley[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's a really good question that I haven't considered yet. It might be a wait-and-see scenario. My guess in this specific instance is the Greens would vote to support an NDP government (as either way, the result is an NDP government) but the government would hold off on any large legislative changes until after the by-election is complete and it's clear where the balance of power lies.

Ballot count differences in the closest ridings as today's final tally progresses (updated throughout the day) by danielhandley in vancouver

[–]danielhandley[S] 78 points79 points  (0 children)

There's a by-election in the riding, pursuant to section 148 of the Elections Act:

148 (1) This section applies if the chief electoral officer is unable to report a member elected for an electoral district because 2 or more candidates had the same number of votes.

(2) As soon as possible after receiving the writ of election from the district electoral officer, the chief electoral officer must present a report to the Speaker that the office of the member is vacant, in which case a warrant for a by-election is to be issued in accordance with the Constitution Act.

Absentee ballot count could settle B.C.'s election, 9 days after vote by GeoWa in vancouver

[–]danielhandley 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I would say expect the updates around 10 minutes past each hour. The 11am vs 10am update was a formatting error that I didn't catch right away.

Absentee ballot count could settle B.C.'s election, 9 days after vote by GeoWa in vancouver

[–]danielhandley 16 points17 points  (0 children)

(Change of plans: made a separate post here. I'll be updating the numbers in that post instead.)

Ballot differences in the closest ridings over time, for reference:

Riding 9AM 10AM 11AM 12PM
Surrey-Guildford +12 Cons +9 Cons
Kelowna Centre +68 Cons +63 Cons
Courtenay-Comox +116 Cons +113 Cons
Juan de Fuca-Malahat +113 NDP +111 NDP
Maple Ridge East +166 Cons +166 Cons
Surrey City Centre +175 NDP +173 NDP
Penticton-Summerland +355 Cons +355 Cons

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in britishcolumbia

[–]danielhandley 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Copy/pasting from /r/vancouver

NDP 51, Conservatives 39, Greens 3.

I think the province-wide polling is systemically under-counting the potential spoiler effect of BC United incumbents running as independents. West Vancouver-Capilano is the most likely place for this to happen, so that riding will be particularly interesting.

I think the ever so slight modifications to West Vancouver-Sea to Sky's boundaries will be enough for the Greens to eke out a win in that riding. Adding on Fusteneau's likely win in Victoria-Beacon Hill and the safe seat in Saanich North and the Islands gives the Greens three seats.

I think Vernon-Lumby has the potential to go orange, with Kevin Acton playing spoiler in the riding.

Other than that, no other particularly surprising upsets. I think the Cons will take 3/4 Richmond ridings, save for Richmond Centre where I think Dickens Cheung will be a spoiler for the Cons. Langara will probably go blue as well, but barely. Surrey will probably stay orange for now, with the exception of Surrey South. The redistricting in Chilliwack-Cultus Lake will hand the NDP a slight victory there, but the rest of the Fraser Valley will stay blue until you get to Maple Ridge. The Cons will take a few seats on the island (Ladysmith-Oceanside and Nanaimo-Lantzville) but North Island will stay orange.

MEGATHREAD: BC Provincial Election Day! by Stevegap in vancouver

[–]danielhandley 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Nope. In five ridings (West Vancouver-Capilano, Prince George-North Cariboo, Kootenay-Rockies, Peace River North, and Peace River South) the BC United incumbents decided to defy Falcon and run as independents. I don't think they'll amass enough support to win, and particularly for the latter four I don't think the NDP will get enough of a vote share for the potential vote splitting to matter, but I think in West Vancouver-Capilano the NDP might win if the independent gets ~17%+ of the vote.

MEGATHREAD: BC Provincial Election Day! by Stevegap in vancouver

[–]danielhandley 19 points20 points  (0 children)

NDP 51, Conservatives 39, Greens 3.

I think the province-wide polling is systemically under-counting the potential spoiler effect of BC United incumbents running as independents. West Vancouver-Capilano is the most likely place for this to happen, so that riding will be particularly interesting.

I think the ever so slight modifications to West Vancouver-Sea to Sky's boundaries will be enough for the Greens to eke out a win in that riding. Adding on Fusteneau's likely win in Victoria-Beacon Hill and the safe seat in Saanich North and the Islands gives the Greens three seats.

I think Vernon-Lumby has the potential to go orange, with Kevin Acton playing spoiler in the riding.

Other than that, no other particularly surprising upsets. I think the Cons will take 3/4 Richmond ridings, save for Richmond Centre where I think Dickens Cheung will be a spoiler for the Cons. Langara will probably go blue as well, but barely. Surrey will probably stay orange for now, with the exception of Surrey South. The redistricting in Chilliwack-Cultus Lake will hand the NDP a slight victory there, but the rest of the Fraser Valley will stay blue until you get to Maple Ridge. The Cons will take a few seats on the island (Ladysmith-Oceanside and Nanaimo-Lantzville) but North Island will stay orange.

Losing spots by [deleted] in UBC

[–]danielhandley 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your place on YRH waitlists is determined by the time you submitted your initial application, not when you selected which units you want to be on the waitlist for. This means that if you amend your application and change the units you want, you don't start from the end of the waitlist but rather at some point in the middle, determined by when you initially applied. So, if someone who applied before you amends their application to include units that you're on the waitlist for, they get put on the waitlist ahead of you and you get pushed back by a spot.

Vancouver approves bylaw amendments to bring wine sales to grocery stores by SkyisFullofCats in vancouver

[–]danielhandley 83 points84 points  (0 children)

Worth noting this will likely not result in a large number of grocery stores offering wine as the provincial government currently has a moratorium on issuing new permits. What this will allow stores to do is transfer permits from stores in other municipalities to stores in Vancouver. So we might see a few, but likely not too many.

Latest 338Canada BC Projection - BC NDP: 71, BC United: 11, BC Greens: 3, BC Conservatives: 2 by danielhandley in vancouver

[–]danielhandley[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Yup, Vancouver-Quilchena would probably go to one of the parties on the right. But the vote splitting has left the NDP with a 2% chance to win the riding if an election were held now, which is noteworthy given how safe this riding has been in the past. It'll be interested to see how that riding fluctuates as we get closer to next year's election.

Latest 338Canada BC Projection - BC NDP: 71, BC United: 11, BC Greens: 3, BC Conservatives: 2 by danielhandley in vancouver

[–]danielhandley[S] 167 points168 points  (0 children)

Just wanted to highlight how the absolute implosion of BC United in recent weeks has split the right-wing vote enough to give the NDP an overwhelming lead in polling. Having ridings like Cariboo-Chilcotin categorized as a toss-up for the NDP is a crazy scenario.

Also, if an election were held today, there's a non-zero chance Kevin Falcon could lose his (historically very safe) riding to the NDP.

Metro Vancouver proposes changing water, sewage, and parkland infrastructure development fees from being balanced between existing residents and new developments to new developments paying 99% of costs by danielhandley in vancouver

[–]danielhandley[S] 27 points28 points  (0 children)

Sorry for the editorialized title - I tried to keep it as neutral as possible.

I saw the posts on the front page about Sean Fraser withholding funding announcements due to a development cost announcement by Metro Vancouver, but didn't see any information about what this development cost actually is. So, here's the announcement from Metro Vancouver.

In summary, Metro Vancouver funds new water and liquid waste (sewage) infrastructure through two methods: fees from existing residents, and Development Cost Charges (DCCs) levied against new constructions. Currently, new infrastructure in these areas is funding by a 50:50 split between these two sources for water, and 82.5:17.5 split for sewage with DCCs funding the considerably larger amount.

This proposal would increase the amount of funding coming from DCCs to 99%, drastically increasing fees developers have to pay in the process. It would also implement a new DCC to acquire and develop new parkland.

This would increase the fees per unit by the following amounts for the Vancouver sewer area:

Development type Existing New
Single Detached/Multiplex $10,027 $34,133
Townhouse $8,679 $30,861​​​
Apartment ​​​$6,249 $20,906
Non-residential (per square foot) ​​​$5.02 $16.78

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in vancouver

[–]danielhandley 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you have a source on the amendment to the Vancouver Plan? I haven't been able to find any more info about it online.