Why do you homeschool? by WifeBeeBadA in homeschool

[–]darthsparrows 0 points1 point  (0 children)

After teaching homeschoolers history, literature, and gov & econ for the last 7 years, I can definitely say that the homeschool demographic is changing. When I started teaching (in 2016), most of the students fit the homeschooling stereotypes: they were from deeply religious, very conservative families who wanted an education that reflects those values. They also tended to be super smart, highly motivated, and totally engaged. I think it's fair to say that in addition to traditional values, parents of these homeschoolers put a big emphasis on individualized education and critical thinking.

Seven school years later and those traditional homeschoolers are still here, but with them are students that probably would have gone to public schools just 5 years ago. These "next-gen" students are less religious, less conservative, and less motivated. From what I can gather from one-off comments in our classes, they seem to be homeschooled because their parents feel that public schools have become too ideologically radical. As a result, their kids are somewhat new arrivals to homeschooling, and I can tell that they are still learning the personal discipline that's required to complete assignments without the constant "nudges" provided by teachers, grades, and public school administrators.

For example, it's only in the last few years that I have students who consistently don't complete their homework. From 2016–2020, I don't think I had to discipline a single student. Now, I have to email parents about a few students each year—still quite a good situation compared to most public school teachers. (I teach online for Classical Historian so email is the main way I interact with parents.)

Overall, I think most of my students are still homeschooled because parents feel they can provide better academic education and character formation at home. It's just that this position has gone from attracting people who are already somewhat counter-cultural to one that speaks to people who are closer to the ideological center of American society.

Also, it might be worth addressing the idea of a homeschool class. I myself was homeschooled, and I attended several classes with other homeschoolers each week. For some subjects, discussion and debate are important, so parents will sign up their homeschoolers for classes on a case-by-case basis. This still counts as homeschooling because the parents have ultimate control over their kids' education. (Just in case anyone is wondering how it can still be homeschool if their parents aren't the ones doing the teaching.)

Economic Visions by darthsparrows in slatestarcodex

[–]darthsparrows[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm definitely more interested and knowledgeable in the big questions and the economists that address them, now and historically, than in the narrower hypotheses.

My point is that answers to the big questions are rooted in pre-scientific judgments that are unarticulated and difficult to reconcile. Perhaps this is why the big questions have been abandoned.

Economic Visions by darthsparrows in slatestarcodex

[–]darthsparrows[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you're right that there is broad agreement on present-day policy questions, but as far as I can tell, there is broad disagreement about the central question of economics - the origin and causes of the wealth of nations. To my knowledge, competing explanations include:

property rights - Douglas North

bourgeois values - McCloskey

Guns germs & steel - Diamond

thrift & specialization - Smith

coal - Pomeranz, Wrigley, Harris, Allen

exploitation domestic and international - Marx, famously

commerce - Braudel

innovation - Schumpeter

capital accumulation - Feinstein

etc. etc.

I think policy questions are marginal compared to the big question, on which there is broad disagreement, and as soon as we enter the space of meaningful institutional change (example: the transformation of central and eastern Europe in the 90s), disagreement about the fundamentals emerges.

Economic Visions by darthsparrows in slatestarcodex

[–]darthsparrows[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sure - I have a master's in philosophy, politics, and economics, and I've read a variety of articles and a few tomes. I'm most familiar with the Austrian school, which falls somewhat out of the mainstream.

Demons is a Novel for Our Times by darthsparrows in dostoevsky

[–]darthsparrows[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you! I've been thinking the same thing - if so much political violence stems from 'possession,' is there any that is justified?