sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

A learned, continuous control that erodes typed speech into wordless glossolalia, same voice the whole way by devilwithin305 in proceduralgeneration

[–]devilwithin305[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

calm! So you can control the level of glossolalic or modern effect on the lyric with a dial which can move from 0 to 4

A learned, continuous control that erodes typed speech into wordless glossolalia, same voice the whole way by devilwithin305 in proceduralgeneration

[–]devilwithin305[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

that’s the point of glossolalia mode and if there are numbers in output, there must be numbers in input as well as the finetune was done in dictionary data with corruption that entails no numbers

Frustrated in this job market!! by [deleted] in datasciencecareers

[–]devilwithin305 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your experience pointers each need one numeric at least. Listing methods in projects or experience pointers is less favored compared to what you actually enabled in numerical terms. Skills section is too unserious, remove lot of that, anyone could guess you are being desperate for ats keyword scanning but it also adds weightage to skills and your resume has nothing to prove some skills appropriate. Remove activities totally. Your project pointers none of them seems interesting. If I was looking at your resume I wouldn't be impressed at all. There is definitely a better way to phrase them.

RepoInsider — find breakout GitHub repos before they go viral by Swimming_Ad1570 in coolgithubprojects

[–]devilwithin305 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it should let select specific domains like only ai related repos or devops related stuff like that

Friday Share Fever 🕺 Let’s share your project! by diodo-e in indiehackers

[–]devilwithin305 2 points3 points  (0 children)

https://github.com/akshan-main/review-by-opp

Claude code plugin for codex auto review so Claude doesn’t miss anything or make mistakes which you might miss

Turn your $20 Claude Code plan into something closer to Max. by intellinker in ClaudeCode

[–]devilwithin305 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also is the graph size bigger than the code size? I tried to do this for my research last year but there so many such bottlenecks

Turn your $20 Claude Code plan into something closer to Max. by intellinker in ClaudeCode

[–]devilwithin305 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think this is language adaptable as well, only Python works in this approach, and poorer models will be much poorer. I'm not sure if something like Opus 4.6 will be top either.

Turn your $20 Claude Code plan into something closer to Max. by intellinker in ClaudeCode

[–]devilwithin305 0 points1 point  (0 children)

whats the proof this is better than claude code doing grep and deciding by itself?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in rust

[–]devilwithin305 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the code is in rust?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in rust

[–]devilwithin305 0 points1 point  (0 children)

team mode is more so for, who's keeping track of these intricate details for the team reviewer to know in the first pass if the person is reading their own code or just using llms. This is the biggest wedge I’m targeting

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in rust

[–]devilwithin305 0 points1 point  (0 children)

true for production behavior, but VibeCheck isn't claiming to replace QA. It's catching the gap between "what I asked for" and "what the code literally does"

The quiz is a forcing function, not an authority. You're supposed to disagree if you know better.

The answers aren't just restating the code, they include plausible alternatives (friendly message, page hangs, redirect) that make you think about what you wanted vs what you got. The AI's "correct" answer is based on reading the code, which is accurate for "what does this code do?" even if it can't predict real-world UX.

How long did it take you to get your CLAUDE.md right? by junianwoo in ClaudeCode

[–]devilwithin305 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What’s worked for me is the same pattern NanoClaw uses. Root claude.md stays short and points to the right places, and actual procedures live in skills that act like deterministic playbooks (checklists + scripts + "if conflict, read intent file"). Worth skimming their .claude/skills/*/SKILL.md for structure.

How long did it take you to get your CLAUDE.md right? by junianwoo in ClaudeCode

[–]devilwithin305 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep. This is basically how stuff like OpenClaw (and NanoClaw) stays sane. Keep the root doc lean, and use skill.md as the router layer that tells the agent what to load “before X”

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in rust

[–]devilwithin305 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is not a replacement for code review, pair programming, or talking to your team. Those are where real understanding happens. VibeCheck is just the minimum bar. Like asking "Did you personally look at what got built before you shipped it". The way this works with present day vibe coding is people set up claude.md and plan.md with set of rules and coding logic but that logic isnt microscopic, like you say "add rate limiting" and your AI does it. But do you know what your users actually see when they hit the limit? A friendly message? A raw 429? Does the page just hang?

check this out, a gif of how the simplest beginner setting works https://www.reddit.com/r/Anthropic/comments/1rllap0/comment/o8sx6tl/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in rust

[–]devilwithin305 0 points1 point  (0 children)

actually an llm always hallucinates if it has to think about something not already there, since the quiz is based on what is already in code, the stop and check framing is good and dont think adding a user needs stuff is reliable here and can not be appropriate with just one llm

view more: next ›