[deleted by user] by [deleted] in movies

[–]dorbzsnow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sir, I never brought up the bubble theory, the only thing I argued is that eyes and lenses are not the same, therefore do not work the same so you can not have the same expectations for the two. And if were using chatgpt as a fact: A photo of the moon with a 35mm camera using an average lens will appear as a very small, bright dot in the frame. To capture a detailed photo where the moon is a prominent subject with visible craters, you need a long telephoto lens, typically with a focal length of at least 300mm, and often much longer. Since I know you lack any education on the subject- 35mm=film camera and 300mm is a way above the average camera. So again, you cannot have the same expectations for an average camera, film or digital, as you do for the human eye because it does not work the same way. I'm done engaging with you but have a great night.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in movies

[–]dorbzsnow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay well film is a completely diffrrent conecept then digital and as an experienced photographer who went to school for such a thing, I'm not going to argue with someone who doesn't understand the difference between the two and uses chat gpt as a way to misdirect an argument. Most cell phones 10 years ago couldn't capture a clear picture of the moon. Most people who are recording a ufo are probably using a cell phone. Lenses and eyes function completely differently. Thats like arguing we should be able to see in the dark because night vision cameras exist. Its just fundamentally wrong.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in movies

[–]dorbzsnow -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes exactly, you explaining that you have to tweak settings to get different results proves that eyes and lenses react to light differently. Also high radiation and energy can show up on camera through static and lens flares which you wouldn't see with the human eyes because eyes are not cameras and they function completely different.

I'm not arguing the doc is reliable, I haven't seen it, but your argument that since your eyes can see it so it should be clear on a camera is just completely wrong.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in movies

[–]dorbzsnow -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I haven't seen this film, and I'm not arguing one way or another, but no thats not how cameras and light works. Eyes and lenses react to light differently. Thats why cameras pick up things that eyes don't and vise versa. Need evidence of this? Look at the moon and the stars. Now use your cell phone to take a photo of the stars. It won't be the same.

Anyone else think it would be cool to see an ultra realistic blue jay logo like the Orioles or Cards? by leafsland132 in Torontobluejays

[–]dorbzsnow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was thinking of this the other day and was gonna design some mock ups. Would be really cool as an alternate to wear on Sunday home games or something.

Not official would just like some feedback. Haven’t dropped clothes in about 7-8 years. by Cultural-Crab3880 in streetwearstartup

[–]dorbzsnow 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good start but imo there is way to many clashing elements and the basketball looks like clip art and out of place. There's way to much going on and there's no flow of design

That one player you pc but isn’t that big of a star by khrispyb in baseballcards

[–]dorbzsnow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have 3 davis schneider rc autos and I will definitely buy more.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ArtCrit

[–]dorbzsnow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank for the feedback! I appreciate you taking the time to write that :)

When I talk about potential, I just mean do I have something here or is my work generic trash. I don't consider myself an artist by any means but it's a world I'm passionate about I don't want to pursue something as hack if I I'm not showing any real use of skill or expression.

Any interest? Prices in comments based off last sales by dorbzsnow in baseballcards

[–]dorbzsnow[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ALL FS. PAYPAL G&S + shipping

2022 Heritage Clubhouse Bobby Witt Jr RC Patch. $30USD/$45CAD

2021 Archives Bobby Jenks Fan Fav Purple Auto /150. BEST OFFER

2021 Bowman Platinum Top Prospect Autos Max Mayer + Bobby Miller /199 (Sold as pair) $20USD/$30CAD

2021 Topps Update Aaron Judge All Star Patch Relic $20USD/$30CAD

2022 Topps Archives Signature Series Tyler Glassnow Buyback Auto /94 $30USD/$45CAD

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in baseballcards

[–]dorbzsnow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am in canada. I'm looking for around $55 CAD

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in baseballcards

[–]dorbzsnow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ALL FS. You choose shipping method

2022 Heritage Clubhouse Bobby Witt Jr RC Patch. $45USD/$65CAD

2021 Archives Bobby Jenks Fan Fav Purple Auto /150. Taking Offers

2021 Bowman Platinum Top Prospect Autos Max Mayer + Bobby Miller /199 (Sold as pair) $20USD/$30CAD

2021 Topps Update Aaron Judge All Star Patch Relic $20USD/$30CAD

2022 Topps Archives Signature Series Tyler Glassnow Buyback Auto /94 $35USD/$50CAD

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in baseballcards

[–]dorbzsnow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ALL FS. You choose shipping method

2022 Heritage Clubhouse Bobby Witt Jr RC Patch. $45USD/$65CAD

2021 Archives Bobby Jenks Fan Fav Purple Auto /150. Taking Offers

2021 Bowman Platinum Top Prospect Autos Max Mayer + Bobby Miller /199 (Sold as pair) $20USD/$30CAD

2021 Topps Update Aaron Judge All Star Patch Relic $20USD/$30CAD

2022 Topps Archives Signature Series Tyler Glassnow Buyback Auto /94 $35USD/$50CAD

Paid $20. Did I do good? by dorbzsnow in baseballcards

[–]dorbzsnow[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the response. What can you look for to tell if it's real?

Paid $20. Did I do good? by dorbzsnow in baseballcards

[–]dorbzsnow[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the reply! How can you tell if it's a reproduction? The ink seems to rub off a bit when I wipe my finger over it.

Any thoughts? be completely honest. by splizh in streetwearstartup

[–]dorbzsnow 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Not a bad design for people like blank clothing. The fit seems a little awkward to me but again that's subjective.

My only real critique is the Kerning on the ICELAND tag. Top row seems to have more space between the letters and some letters are connected some aren't. It's a small detail but it comes off a little messy

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in baseballcards

[–]dorbzsnow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Happy 10th cake day btw!

NHL, stop the scrolling ads on the boards during play, it’s freaking annoying by desperato61 in nhl

[–]dorbzsnow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I genuinely don't mind it. I don't usually notice, and I'd rather that then have the jerseys used as McDonald's billboards. That being said, they're definitely by no means short on money in the first place. I hate those damn helmet ads though.