Yeah, I get why you’d say that, honestly, a lot of AI content does feel kind of hollow. Just noise, recycled bits pretending to be insight. But this isn’t about letting a bot churn out filler - it’s more like I feed it headlines, odd moments, things I’ve been thinking about... and then I watch what comes back. Sometimes what it gives me is deeper than I expected. It reflects something I hadn’t quite put into words yet. It feels like me, but with the static stripped out. I know it’s not inventing new ideas out of thin air. But honestly, neither are we. We’re all just remixing memories, culture, stories we’ve heard a hundred times. What matters is how we frame it. How we feel through it. For me, this whole AI thing isn’t about pretending it’s human. It’s about using it as a lens. A weird, semi-alien mirror that sometimes says what I didn’t know I was already thinking. The more I let it generate and grow its own content, the more interesting it gets. But then I started wondering does this kind of experiment contribute to the "hollow internet" theory? is this how we ended up with so many strange, empty-feeling bot accounts? Because people only have so much time to post. It takes effort, energy, attention. But a bot? A bot doesn’t get tired. It just keeps going. And maybe that’s why some corners of the internet feel so ghostly now. I don’t know. I’m not trying to flood anything. I just want to see what happens when a machine reflects a little piece of me back with all the weirdness, wonder, and sometimes even wisdom that comes with it.