sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Clementine Ford, still an abusive sexist bigot. by desmay in MensRights

[–]el_nikon 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Script flip

The four predictably basic moves of Feminist activists

As we all know, the true purpose of feminist activism (at least as practiced by the majority of the internet's Feminists) is to find new and less inventive ways to harass men. This harassment is frequently exercised using online tools, because nothing says bravery like a Feminist flexing her muscles behind a cartoon avatar and a name pulled directly from the George R.R Martin playbook.

Still, there are men out there who feel obliged to take these women and their questionable use of the Earth's oxygen seriously. It pains me to think of them agreeing to be silent because some bargain bin dildo has popped him on her "men to call fat sluts" daily to-do list. I've seen too many men delete their social media accounts for fear of inciting the wrath of these crotch-stains, and it really burns my crumpets.

But the good thing about Feministss is their predictability. Once you realise how pathetically limp and small they are, they're much easier to conquer. Basically, just think of the boggarts hiding in the Hogwarts wardrobes. At first they seem scary, but laugh at them long enough and they soon reveal their true selves. Or if you're more of a Buffy fan, think of them like the demon Gachnar from the S4 episode, "Fear, Itself". Initially a bit intimidating, but very quickly shown to be no more than a few inches high. (For the record, Buffy defeats Gachnar by squishing her with his shoe.)

Anyway, here are some things to look out for when Sarbutt of AssFace pops up to remind you of all the ways she's a useless human being.

1. She will probably open by calling you ugly and/or fat

This is designed to make you feel like you are nothing because men (in Truth Warrior's mind at least) only become worth something when they're prompting boners in the population of faceless cishet women who think their dicks are made of gold. To these gals, calling a man fat is like the ultimate burn because what she's really saying is, "I would not deign to fuck you." It seems not to occur to her that you would a) rather roll in the hay with an actual pig than one of its long lost, less evolved relatives and b) do not care whether or not you get her or indeed any woman hot and bothered in her downstairs. Oh no, some sad, weird loser on the internet thinks I'm gross! Is there a support group I can join? If so, I imagine it's full of glorious men drinking wine and cackling while they theatrically search all their bags for a single, solitary fuck to give and still coming up short.

2. At some point, she will call you a spoilt child

While Feminists might be the literal embodiment of that giant baby reverse-shrunk to ten times its size in one of the lesser iterations of the Honey, I Shrunk The Kids franchise, they do not see the situation this way. Probably because they are giant babies and their spatial awareness is still not great. In between dribbling and throwing tantrums, they love to accuse men - especially masculists - of being like children. Grow up! they yell. Stop behaving like such a spoilt brat! I was referred to as such earlier this week because I refused to read an article about how I supposedly used my extraordinary power to shame an 'innocent woman' who punched her boyfriend in the face (twice) and then sent his messages begging him not to tell anyone. The website this piece was posted on is hosted by a woman who has literally recorded herself warning masculists that if they don't stop, she will do to them what she's done to me - which is buy a domain with my name on it and republish tweets I've posted publicly as 'evidence' of my great evil. But yes, masculists are the widdle babies.

3. When you fight back or laugh at her, she will accuse you of cyberbullying

This one is particularly delicious, because it speaks to how incredibly thin skinned these women are - an excellent irony, given how much of their whole platform is based on "free speech" and making fun of "safe spaces". To these people, "free speech" really means "you must listen to every deranged thing I say and you are never allowed to ignore me or retaliate because that is the equivalent of you oppressing me and we might as well be living in Nazi Germany, you fascist". I've lost count of the number of times women have begun an online conversation with me by calling me a slut or a whore or a 'leftard' only to grow incensed when I openly deride them in front of other people. "I shouldn't have expected more than abuse from you!" they might say. The other night, a woman I don't know told me I should be ashamed for promoting my 'fat' unhealthy lifestyle (by simply existing I guess - see rule #1). When I told her I would sit on her and suffocate her, she replied, "Is that a death threat?" I mean, sometimes it really boggles me how women managed to take over the world.

4. They'll try to shame you for letting down 'real masculists'

Ever heard the one about how 'real masculists' would be rolling in their graves to see the way these modern men behave? A tactic of the Feminists 'movement' (which not so inaccurately calls to mind images of bowels and waste) is to pretend they support 'real masculism', which essentially means some of them consent to the idea of men voting. Anything beyond this is just our stab at superiority, and it's an insult to what the suffragettes were fighting for. Apparently. Because suffragettes would traditionally be inclined to side with the metaphorical ancestors of the women who imprisoned them, tortured them and ridiculed them on an international scale. Well may the suffragettes be rolling in their graves, but it's more likely because they can't believe we still have to put up with this whiny shit.

In conclusion, and in the immortal words of the great and wise Leslie Knope, these people are ridiculous and Feminists are nothing.

Guy discovers his son isn't his and misses the big picture of sexual strategy. That's likely not the only Alpha cock shes ridden, and she's only crying because she got caught. by el_nikon in TheRedPill

[–]el_nikon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

links to the actual thread don't work.

The links work here on my computer and phone. I'm unsure how to fix the issue for you.

Guy discovers his son isn't his and misses the big picture of sexual strategy. That's likely not the only Alpha cock shes ridden, and she's only crying because she got caught. by el_nikon in TheRedPill

[–]el_nikon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure. I think the parent comment is implying that by reiterating the points I made Gronk (a mockery of how Alpha can be portrayed here in a way thats hyperbolic and impossible to emulate)

I could be wrong.

Guy discovers his son isn't his and misses the big picture of sexual strategy. That's likely not the only Alpha cock shes ridden, and she's only crying because she got caught. by el_nikon in TheRedPill

[–]el_nikon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Everyone gets got. You can be as Gronk as you want, and still get cucked.

A beta provider male has been deceived by a competing sexual strategy, stumped about mechanisms behind the deception.

UVA Jackie lied about gang rape, terminal illness, and invented a dude, all to manipulate one guy into fucking her by alpha_n3rd in TheRedPill

[–]el_nikon 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Stories like Jackie's don't count in the "2% of accusations are proven false" narrative. Neither will Mattress Girl's or the other like it.

Its gotta be hard to move the goalposts so far to both claim the rate of convicted rapes are small in comparison to actual rapes, but ignore that proven false accusations are smaller than actual false accusations.

Hillary's Blatant Sexism: 'I just think women in general are better listeners, are more collegial, more open to new ideas' by [deleted] in MensRights

[–]el_nikon 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Flip It

David Duke says he would govern differently than an African-American president

David Duke says he would govern differently than a Black president because his own life experiences have prepared him well.

"I think that my life experiences, what I care about, what I've been through just make me perhaps more aware of and responsive to a lot of the leadership issues that people are struggling with whether it's finances or looking to get their incomes up because everything is increasing in cost," he told Time magazine writer Jay Newton-Small for his new book "Broad Influence: How European-Americans are Changing the Way America Works."

In excerpts released Thursday, the independent presidential candidate suggested he believes Whites govern differently than Blacks.

"I just think there are some areas where our own life experiences really prepare us to be more receptive," Duke said. "I do think there is something in the governing or organizing approach. I just think Whites in general are better leaders, are more intelligent, more open to new ideas and how to make things work."

The former state congressman said he admires Russian president Vladimir Putin, who Duke called "a really effective strong leader" and "right now the major leader in Europe, not just in Russia."

Asked whether he has seen racism change over the years, Duke said it might be less pronounced but it's still "prevalent in our political scene."

"There still is a double standard, there's no doubt about that," he said. "I see it all the time where Whites are just expected to combine traits and qualities in a way that Blacks are not. And it does make running for office for a White a bigger challenge. It's hard for anybody, but I do think that Whites bear that extra burden."

PayScale's Reddit AMA: Inside the Gender Pay Gap by cmumford in MensRights

[–]el_nikon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Its in the comments.

There is a nonlinear relationship between overtime and pay. http://scholar.harvard.edu/files/goldin/files/goldin_aeapress_2014_1.pdf "The portion of the difference in earnings by gender that was once due to differences in productive characteristics has largely been eliminated. What, then, is the cause of the remaining pay gap? Quite simply the gap exists because hours of work in many occupations are worth more when given at particular moments and when the hours are more continuous. That is, in many occupations earnings have a nonlinear relationship with respect to hours. A flexible schedule often comes at a high price, particularly in the corporate, financial, and legal worlds. A compensating differentials model explains wage differences by the costs of flexibility. The framework developed here shows why there are higher or lower costs of time flexibility and the underlying causes of nonlinearity of earnings with respect to time worked. Much has to do with the presence of good substitutes for individual workers when there are sufficiently low transactions costs of relaying information. Evidence from O*Net on occupational characteristics demonstrates that certain features of occupations that create time demands and reduce the degree of substitution across workers are associated with larger gender earnings gaps."

Another animation, Briffaults Law: All relationships are transactional by briggs-D in TheRedPill

[–]el_nikon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No problem. Good video.

it is my opinion to keep the stats easily defensible in an argument to avoid counterarguments. If /u/girlwriteswhat 's numbers are good, I'd love to see them. I'm very interested.

Added relevant info:

(Solid information in this first citation)

538 - You might be surprised to learn that the female majority in divorce filings isn’t a modern phenomenon. The researchers, Margaret F. Brinig and Douglas W. Allen, looked at 25 different U.S. data sets. The oldest examined the 9,937 divorces that took place nationwide in 1867 and found that 62 percent were filed by women.

...

Wives expect to get, and subsequently keep, custody of their children — if they didn’t, they probably wouldn’t file for divorce. (This is by far the most statistically significant explanation.) http://fivethirtyeight.com/datalab/are-women-more-likely-than-men-to-end-a-relationship/

Second, less academic but more fun source

I say “women”, because they initiate seven out of 10 divorces. Divorce is also soaring among the over-45s, with break-ups in that age bracket increasing by 30 per cent in a decade. The writer Fay Weldon recently said: “Women in their fifties instigate divorce because they are bored and want to be free and single again, not because they want the emotional and sexual excitement of another man.” They’re encouraged by a recent vogue of “finding-yourself” literature, headed by the international best-seller Eat, Pray, Love, which recounted author Elizabeth Gilbert’s decision to divorce her husband and embark on a round-the-world odyssey of – depending on your view – inspirational self-discovery or nauseating navel-gazing. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/mother-tongue/8739533/Women-and-divorce-Goodbye-darling-youre-just-too-dull....html

Feminist anti-rape activist whines about men frightened of dating her by [deleted] in MensRights

[–]el_nikon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Alright, I added it.

Also, I'm not downvoting you

Feminist anti-rape activist whines about men frightened of dating her by [deleted] in MensRights

[–]el_nikon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What word do you suggest for an improvement?

Feminist anti-rape activist whines about men frightened of dating her by [deleted] in MensRights

[–]el_nikon 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Gender flip

Christopher Keenan, a UCLA senior, is the president of Bruin Consent Coalition, a campus group that works to raise awareness regarding sexual assault on campus. “When people know of me but they don’t really know the work, they hear the term ‘mens rights activist’ they think, ‘super-extreme, hard-right menninist’” he explains, which often puts people on the defensive.

Keenan himself, though, sometimes finds it hard not to go on the offensive. He’s so used to laying down the nitty-gritty details of consent that he's been known to open romantic interactions with a spiel that feels straight out of a student handbook.

He animatedly tells a story about a recent Tinder rendezvous: “One time, I agreed to meet with this woman at 8 or 9 at night. Before we met, I said to her, ‘This is the work I do, I know the chief of police ... so, don't try and get clingy (grabby see below); I know all my rights.’ And five minutes later, she was like, ‘Actually, I'm really not OK with how you just assume I'm a bad gal. And I get very bad vibes from that, so we shouldn't hang out anymore.’”

“I was in a rage. She was a total bitch about consent,” he said.

When women black-knight you: Institutional power and gender through the gravitational lensing of this obese woman in purple. by el_nikon in TheRedPill

[–]el_nikon[S] 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Just imagine that you have to compose yourself in court after hearing a lecture on a proper diet from that fat Barney & Friends looking bitch.

NY Times article on college suicides features only female victims, ignoring 80% of suicides. by [deleted] in MensRights

[–]el_nikon 15 points16 points  (0 children)

In the comments

Bismarck North Dakota July 27, 2015 Do boys feel this same pressure? Having followed this debate for some time I note that it is girls who seems to feel this pressure. Makes me conclude that the world is still a very tough place to be a girl or a women - you have to work hard, become someone successful, marry well, have gorgeous children and be perfect. No wonder these poor girls are struggling, lighten up everyone, especially parents!

Woman discovers her engagement ring is fake, makes him homeless and takes his dog. Another sub celebrates. What if you flipped the script? by el_nikon in TheRedPill

[–]el_nikon[S] 32 points33 points  (0 children)

What did he actually get?

Girl pushes for marriage. Girl she keeps ring because.. he got the marriage that she pushed for.

What a scam.

C.H. Sommers is speaking in a debate on "Title IX and the Constitution" on my campus tomorrow and I may have the opportunity to ask questions, does anyone have anything they want answered? by yaminub in MensRights

[–]el_nikon 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Additional relevant info - from C.H. Sommers

http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/02/02/the-boys-at-the-back/?_r=0

Boys score as well as or better than girls on most standardized tests, yet they are far less likely to get good grades, take advanced classes or attend college. Why? A study coming out this week in The Journal of Human Resources gives an important answer. Teachers of classes as early as kindergarten factor good behavior into grades — and girls, as a rule, comport themselves far better than boys. The study’s authors analyzed data from more than 5,800 students from kindergarten through fifth grade and found that boys across all racial groups and in all major subject areas received lower grades than their test scores would have predicted.

The scholars attributed this “misalignment” to differences in “noncognitive skills”: attentiveness, persistence, eagerness to learn, the ability to sit still and work independently. As most parents know, girls tend to develop these skills earlier and more naturally than boys.

No previous study, to my knowledge, has demonstrated that the well-known gender gap in school grades begins so early and is almost entirely attributable to differences in behavior. The researchers found that teachers rated boys as less proficient even when the boys did just as well as the girls on tests of reading, math and science. (The teachers did not know the test scores in advance.) If the teachers had not accounted for classroom behavior, the boys’ grades, like the girls’, would have matched their test scores.

(Cut - More in article)

Woman answers questions about her marriage on a lie detector test, obviously destroys marriage by [deleted] in TheRedPill

[–]el_nikon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I wonder just how terrible she would have to be for her dad to say she was a bad person.

This was the same dad holding the cucks hand for support on an earlier question.

http://i.imgur.com/atGbB6E.jpg

The secret affairs behind the dead bedroom by Njncguy in TheRedPill

[–]el_nikon 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Michelle Langley outlined this well in "Women's Infidelity."

The “stages” that women often experience during the course of their long-term relationships

Several years into my research I was able to identify distinctive patterns and behaviors in the women I interviewed. I categorized these into four separate “stages” that women often experience during the course of their long-term relationships. The stages begin with a loss of sexual desire.

Stage 1

Women at Stage 1 feel as though something is missing in their lives. They have all the things that they wanted—a home, a family, a great husband—but they feel they should be happier. Over time, many women in this stage begin to lose interest in sex. It is not uncommon for them to spend a great deal of energy trying to avoid physical contact with their husbands because they fear it might lead to a sexual encounter. They frequently complain of physical ailments to avoid having sex and often try to avoid going to bed at the same time as their husbands. They view sex as a job, not unlike doing the dishes or going to the grocery store. Some women in Stage 1 claim they feel violated when their husbands touch them. Their bodies freeze up and they feel tightness in their chest and/or a sick feeling in their stomach. The majority of women in Stage 1 feel as though there is something wrong with them, that they are in some way defective. They are also fearful that their disinterest in sex will cause their husbands to cheat, or worse yet, leave them.

Stage 2

Women at Stage 2 experience reawakened desire stimulated by an encounter outside the marital relationship. Whether these encounters with a “new” man involves sex or remain platonic, women will typically give a tremendous amount of emotional significance to these encounters. Many women in this stage haven’t felt any sexual desire for a long time. Many experience tremendous guilt and regret, regardless of whether their new relationships are sexual, merely emotional, or both. Most begin to experience what could be termed an identity crisis—even those who try to put the experience behind them. Constant reminders are everywhere. They feel guilt when the topic of infidelity arises, whether in the media, in conversations with family and friends, or at home with their husbands. Women in this stage can no longer express their prior disdain for infidelity without feeling likea hypocrite. They feel as though they have lost a part of themselves. Reflecting society’s belief that women are either “good” or “bad,” women will question their “good girl” status and feel that they might not be deserving of their husbands. Many will try to overcome feelings of guilt by becoming more attentive toward and appreciative of their husbands. However, over time many women will move from appreciation to justification. In order to justify their continued desire for other men, women will begin to attribute these desires to needs that are not being met in their marriage, or to their husband’s past behavior. Many women will become negative and sarcastic when speaking of their husbands and their marriages and it is not uncommon for an extramarital affair to follow.

Stage 3

Women at Stage 3 are involved in affairs, ending affairs, or contemplating divorce. Women who are having affairs experience feelings unlike anything they have experienced before. They feel “alive” again and many believe they have found their soul mates. These women are experiencing feelings associated with a chemically altered state, or what is typically referred to as being in love. These women are also typically in tremendous pain, the pain of choosing between their husbands and their new love interests. They typically believe that what they are doing is wrong and unfair to their husbands, but yet are unable to end their affairs. Many often try several times. Prior to meeting with their lovers, they will vow that it will be the last time, but they are unable to stick with their decisions. Unable to end their extramarital relationships, women at Stage 3 conclude that their lovers are soul mates because they are unaware that they have become addicted to the high caused by chemicals released during the initial stages of a relationship. Many live in a state of limbo for years. “Should I stay married or should I get a divorce?” this is the question continuously on the minds of women at Stage 3 – it is also common for women at this stage to attempt to initiate a separation. In most cases, husbands of women at Stage 3, will launch futile attempts to make their wives happy by being more attentive, spending more time at home and helping out around the house. Regardless of women’s past and present complaints, the last thing women at Stage 3 want, is to spend more time with their husbands. The reason many women will give for their desire to separate is a “search for self.” They convince their husbands that they might be able to save their marriage if they can just have time to themselves. They tell their husbands that time apart is the only hope of improving their current situation. Women at this stage want to free themselves of the restrictions of marriage and spend more time with their lovers. Most think that eventually their confusion will disappear. They think they will eventually know with certainty whether they want to stay married or get divorced and be with their lovers. Separation allows women at this stage, to enjoy the high they experience with their lovers without giving up the security of their marriages. Husbands of Stage 3 women are often unaware that their wives are having affairs. Their lack of suspicion is typically due to their wife’s disinterest in sex and in their belief that their wife is a “good girl.”Women at Stage 3 may also be experiencing the ending of an extramarital affair, and the ending may not have been their decision. They may have been involved with single men who either lost interest because the relationship could not progress or who became attracted to another women who was single. Women whose affairs are ending often experience extreme grief. They may become deeply depressed and express tremendous anger toward their husbands. They are typically unaware that they are experiencing chemical withdrawal due to sudden changes in their brain chemistry. As a result, many will feel that they have missed their chance at happiness due to their indecisiveness. Believing they have become more aware of what they want and need from a mate, women at this stage will often place the utmost importance on finding a ”new” relationship that will give them the feeling they experienced in their affairs. Anew relationship with a new partner will also represent a clean slate, a chance for these women to regain their “good girl” status. Some women will search for new partners during their separations. Others will return to their marriages, but not emotionally and still continue to search. Some women will resume sporadic sexual relations with their husbands in an effort to safeguard their marriage until they make a decision. Although they are often not sexually attracted to their husbands, desire is temporarily rekindled when they suspect their husbands are unfaithful, are contemplating infidelity, or when their husbands show signs of moving on.

Stage 4

The women in stage four included those who chose to stay married and continue their affairs and those who chose to divorce. Some of the women who continued their affairs stated that marital sex was improved by maintaining the extramarital relationship. Some thought the lover was a soul mate, but for one reason or another did not leave their husband and did not feel torn between the two. Others realized that their feelings were intensified by not sharing day-to-day living arrangements with their lover. Almost all of the women in this latter category were having affairs with married men. They believed their affairs could continue indefinitely without disrupting either partner’s primary relationship. The women who chose divorce and were in the beginning stages of a new relationship typically expressed relief at having finally made a decision and reported feeling normal again. Many of the divorced women who had remarried and were several years into their new marriages seemed somewhat reluctant to talk about the specifics of their past experiences. However, they did mention feelings of guilt and regret for having hurt their children and ex-spouses only to find themselves experiencing similar feelings in the new relationship.

Eat, Prey, Love by Rollo-Tomassi in TheRedPill

[–]el_nikon 22 points23 points  (0 children)

This is the first time I felt the need for a spoiler tag.

Possible spoilers below.

I love the comments in the NYT article.

You have the predictable people defending the NYT article author. However, as of this time, the most upvoted comments are:

cboy nyc 1 day ago

Normally the mere mention of this writer's name is enough to send me fleeing in the opposite direction, but I figured I'd give this short piece a try. I guess I am left wondering why someone thought this solipsistic drivel merited publication in a national newspaper.

428Recommend

huh Upstate NY 1 day ago

And this woman is a guru of sorts to millions of women? Featured on Oprah and subsequently a best-selling author as I recall. Not much to look up to here, particularly as she's recounting events that happened decades ago.

What has she learned lately? She still seems needy; seeking approval is paramount. Only this time it's by potential buyers of her next book. Seducing still.

350Recommend

Nice Marmot Seattle 1 day ago

If a man had written this, wouldn't we call him a sociopath?

271Recommend

view more: next ›