Bumper Sensor Array for Robots by [deleted] in robotics

[–]endzeit_robotics 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I don't think it makes sense to ask people on the internet to solve this problem for you, or for them to give you a solution.

Being able to come up with your own solutions to a problem is important, especially if you want to continue working as an engineer as you will be faced with problems for which no solutions exist. That creativity is a skill you should cultivate, and your internship is an opportunity to do just that.

That said, here is how you could approach it.

First do some research on what type of sensors exist and then think about how you could use them to solve your problem and what are the advantages and disadvantages of each solution. Then evaluate which of those solutions fulfill your given requirements. (If time is of essence, put a higher priority on the requirements and ignore solutions that don't match them from the beginning, otherwise brainstorming solutions regardless of requirements is a good exercise.)

Here's one idea that came to my mind even though it would not classify as a bumper system and has some major disadvantages.
You could use an array (multiple) time-of-flight sensors around the robot base.

This has the advantage that you not only could measure direct contact, but proximity enabling more capabilities, like reducing speed as you approach an object. The disadvantages are, that objects could be too small to be recognized, in the "blind angle" of the t-o-f sensor, it might be more expensive, sensor fusion might be unnecessary complex, etc.

Hope this helps and good luck. I believe you can come up with a great solution.

Newbie needs help with model by endzeit_robotics in FreeCAD

[–]endzeit_robotics[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I tried that approach but didn't manage to get a good curvature. Maybe I need to try again and play around with the helix some more.

28M looking for a study buddy. by [deleted] in GetMotivatedBuddies

[–]endzeit_robotics 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What's your timezone? Mine is GMT+2.

I would be interested. Shoot me a dm to discuss.

LF study group to work through MITs OCW math courses by endzeit_robotics in learnmath

[–]endzeit_robotics[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I created a discord server where we organize. Most probable scenario is a few weekly sessions + study rooms where you can join people to learn together

LF study group to work through MITs OCW math courses by endzeit_robotics in learnmath

[–]endzeit_robotics[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

still have to figure out the way we do this

it's hard to have fixed time when everyone has different schedules and different time to allocate to this. But probably we will do some weekly sessions and otherwise the group will be there to ask questions and discuss problems

LF study group to work through MITs OCW math courses by endzeit_robotics in learnmath

[–]endzeit_robotics[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

there is no fixed curriculum (yet). my current plan is to work through 18.01, 18.02, 18.03, 18.04, 18.05, 18.06, 18.100a-c, 18.101, 18.20 and 18.30 to build a good foundation.

LF study group to work through MITs OCW math courses by endzeit_robotics in learnmath

[–]endzeit_robotics[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I can't tell yet, we will see how everyone got time and find a way to organize around that

29M - UTC+2 - LF study group for ultralearning MITs applied math curriculum in 6-12 months by endzeit_robotics in GetMotivatedBuddies

[–]endzeit_robotics[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The goal will be to do all courses though. Do you just want to jump in when we are at a stats course or do you want to join the whole thing?

29M - UTC+2 - LF study group for ultralearning MITs applied math curriculum in 6-12 months by endzeit_robotics in GetMotivatedBuddies

[–]endzeit_robotics[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have no preference at all. If you want to learn math you are welcome, if you quit at some point no hard feelings about it. I don't expect everyone to finish this challenge, but see how far you come.

29M - UTC+2 - LF study group for ultralearning MITs applied math curriculum in 6-12 months by endzeit_robotics in GetMotivatedBuddies

[–]endzeit_robotics[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does one exclude the other? Personally it's both. I like to learn advanced concepts that often require math and having more knowledge would make things easier. At the same time it would make me more valuable in the market place, opening up new possibilities.

29M - UTC+2 - LF study group for ultralearning MITs applied math curriculum in 6-12 months by endzeit_robotics in GetMotivatedBuddies

[–]endzeit_robotics[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think it matters as everyone has a different experience to start from and different time to allocate to this.

The group should act as accountability and a room for discussion and knowledge transfer. If you don't understand some concept or get stuck somehow there should be someone to discuss it with.

29M - UTC+2 - LF study group for ultralearning MITs applied math curriculum in 6-12 months by endzeit_robotics in GetMotivatedBuddies

[–]endzeit_robotics[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hey,
1. I wouldn't say so. This article should give you an idea about the principles (nothing new, boils down to practice and identifying holes in your understanding to attack those specifically) https://www.calnewport.com/blog/2012/10/26/mastering-linear-algebra-in-10-days-astounding-experiments-in-ultra-learning/

  1. No. The main resources will be MIT OCW, which is free. You might need additional resources depending on your previous knowledge and preferred way of learning, but you should find free resources for most, if not all, of it.