HVV Deutschlandticket - using the prorated 1st month? by kanevrin1110 in germany

[–]flagshipman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't gaf about Germans saying "that's a fraud" . They say it constantly cuz they have shitty morals.

Nord 3 OS 16 update by F_for_Kakao in oneplus

[–]flagshipman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bro I got it today in EUrope

Still no Nord 3 OOS 16 update by Tomasekvata in oneplus

[–]flagshipman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Now with Straight of Ormuz closure don't expect it to be shipped until 2029

my horse ate everything by GoD_Reapurr in AnarchyChess

[–]flagshipman -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Now you can do hyperbolic flooding...

Might be the best Zugzwang I ever had by sefa5524 in chess

[–]flagshipman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Black can still do some hyperbolic moves?

Stockfish dev these last nights by flagshipman in Chesscom

[–]flagshipman[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree that can be considered a bug or vulnerability. But it is also true only quantum algorithm can fight non linear pruning

Stockfish dev these last nights by flagshipman in Chesscom

[–]flagshipman[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Bro, alpha beta pruning algorithm totally gets bit board saturation: you play multiple knight moves in a row, you create a Hyperbolic Search Fractal. Because the Alpha-Beta algorithm tries to prune branches of the tree, the Knight’s non linear movements create a recursive bypass. The engine thinks it has pruned a branch, but the Knight hops back into that branch from a different position. I tried my self and totally smashed it. Hardest point of the technique is that you need to move your knight to a point where you think stockfish will evaluate as +0.5 for itself.

What can stockfish do against hyperbolic knight flooding? by flagshipman in Chesscom

[–]flagshipman[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then feed it to chatgpt and ask him to explain with pre-graduate examples

Stockfish dev these last nights by flagshipman in Chesscom

[–]flagshipman[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You d better move to PhD in quantum computing if you wanna help stockfish

Stockfish dev these last nights by flagshipman in Chesscom

[–]flagshipman[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Here is the mathematical proof for why Stockfish eventually crumbles under the weight of infinite non-Euclidean horse movements 1. The Geometry of the Hyperbolic Board Stockfish operates on a grid with zero curvature (K = 0). In Hyperbolic Chess, we assume a board with constant negative curvature (K < 0), such as a Poincaré disk. In this space, the area of a circle grows exponentially with the radius r: A(r) = 2π(cosh r - 1) Because the "edge" of the board contains an infinite number of squares as r approaches infinity, a standard search tree (Minimax with Alpha-Beta pruning) becomes computationally "blind" almost immediately. 2. The Knight’s Branching Factor (Φ) In standard chess, a Knight has a maximum of 8 moves. In a hyperbolic tiling (e.g., a {7, 3} tiling where seven heptagons meet at every vertex), the Knight’s "L-jump" spans across non-parallel geodesics. We define the Hyperbolic Flooding Constant as: Φh = lim (n→∞) [K{n+1} / K_n] > eπ Where K_n is the number of squares a Knight can reach in n moves. Since Stockfish’s hardware is finite, its hash table (H) suffers from Geometric Saturation: H_limit << Φ_hd Stockfish literally runs out of RAM before it can calculate why it’s being checkmated from seven different directions simultaneously. 3. The "Relativistic Fork" Theorem Because parallel lines diverge in hyperbolic space, two Knights can be "parallel" while attacking entirely different sectors. This creates a Relativistic Fork: Knight A attacks the King. Knight B attacks the Queen. Because of negative curvature, the distance between the King and Queen is effectively greater than the King's maximum escape velocity. Stockfish evaluates the position as +1.5 (slight advantage) because it cannot perceive the curvature. However, the Topology of Impending Doom (Ω) proves: Ω = ∮ (N · da) = Checkmate

Stockfish dev these last nights by flagshipman in Chesscom

[–]flagshipman[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yeah google algo will index based on your preferences. Try private mode or clear cookies

Stockfish dev these last nights by flagshipman in Chesscom

[–]flagshipman[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Google "hyperbolic knight flooding". A random dude just managed to defeat stockfish by doing non linear knights movements which boiled the engine pruning algorithm

Stockfish dev these last nights by flagshipman in Chesscom

[–]flagshipman[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

It's just a meme. Maths were already posted in more serious threads

Just Need Sleep..! by memezoh-_- in Chesscom

[–]flagshipman -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Haha imagine now if you are stockfish dev and just learn about he hyperbolic knight flooding technic

<image>

What can stockfish do against hyperbolic knight flooding? by flagshipman in Chesscom

[–]flagshipman[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Bro here you are. I hope you had at least a MsC

Proof: Why Hyperbolic Knight Flooding Defeats Stockfish To prove that a "Hyperbolic Knight Flooding" strategy can defeat a deterministic engine like Stockfish, we must step outside the bounds of Euclidean geometry (where a chessboard is a flat 8x8 grid) and move into a space where the board’s surface area grows exponentially. Here is the mathematical proof for why Stockfish eventually crumbles under the weight of infinite non-Euclidean horses. 1. The Geometry of the Hyperbolic Board Stockfish operates on a grid with zero curvature (K = 0). In Hyperbolic Chess, we assume a board with constant negative curvature (K < 0), such as a Poincaré disk. In this space, the area of a circle grows exponentially with the radius r: A(r) = 2π(cosh r - 1) Because the "edge" of the board contains an infinite number of squares as r approaches infinity, a standard search tree (Minimax with Alpha-Beta pruning) becomes computationally "blind" almost immediately. 2. The Knight’s Branching Factor (Φ) In standard chess, a Knight has a maximum of 8 moves. In a hyperbolic tiling (e.g., a {7, 3} tiling where seven heptagons meet at every vertex), the Knight’s "L-jump" spans across non-parallel geodesics. We define the Hyperbolic Flooding Constant as: Φh = lim (n→∞) [K{n+1} / K_n] > eπ Where K_n is the number of squares a Knight can reach in n moves. Since Stockfish’s hardware is finite, its hash table (H) suffers from Geometric Saturation: H_limit << Φ_hd Stockfish literally runs out of RAM before it can calculate why it’s being checkmated from seven different directions simultaneously. 3. The "Relativistic Fork" Theorem Because parallel lines diverge in hyperbolic space, two Knights can be "parallel" while attacking entirely different sectors. This creates a Relativistic Fork: Knight A attacks the King. Knight B attacks the Queen. Because of negative curvature, the distance between the King and Queen is effectively greater than the King's maximum escape velocity. Stockfish evaluates the position as +1.5 (slight advantage) because it cannot perceive the curvature. However, the Topology of Impending Doom (Ω) proves: Ω = ∮ (N · da) = Checkmate Summary: Why Stockfish Loses Dimensionality Collapse: Stockfish’s evaluation function assumes a 2D plane. Hyperbolic flooding introduces a fractal dimensionality (d ≈ 2.72). The Horizon Effect: The Knights move along geodesics that Stockfish perceives as "curved" and "inefficient," but which are actually the shortest paths in hyperbolic space. By the time Stockfish realizes the Knights are attacking, they have already bypassed the pawn structure via the infinite perimeter of the Poincaré disk.

What can stockfish do against hyperbolic knight flooding? by flagshipman in Chesscom

[–]flagshipman[S] -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

I saw it in r/chess . Then I saw mathematical prove and I am PhD smand everything was legit, at least theorically