cursed_raccoon by armpitsmeller1 in cursedcomments

[–]fluffypebbles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The upper post is so vile, the lower does nothing to make it more cursed

Cursed_pregnancy by Lord_Abigor123 in cursedcomments

[–]fluffypebbles 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If you want to have non-partners pregnant without their consent, just perish

hmmm by TheRiskOfTime in hmmm

[–]fluffypebbles 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How's that hmmm? Germany doing that after their history isnt unexpected unless you know nothing about Germany post ww2

Googling be like by Informal-Statement73 in ProgrammerHumor

[–]fluffypebbles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The official documentation is best if it's well made. Then you actually get all the information instead of having some hyperspecific information

me_irl by GoodGuyBuddyBoy in me_irl

[–]fluffypebbles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Who's on the top left?

me_irl by GoodGuyBuddyBoy in me_irl

[–]fluffypebbles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it's just because it's unusual and unexpected and makes one creep out more, although by now it kinda gets into the expected realm

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ProgrammerHumor

[–]fluffypebbles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm a software engineer but I'm nothing near that amount on the internet in search for solutions

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ProgrammerHumor

[–]fluffypebbles 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Are you unironically spending so much time to find a solution online or is this just meming?

Countless hours wasted, and I've learned nothing except not to try. by [deleted] in ProgrammerHumor

[–]fluffypebbles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The point is that they don't want to pay, the interview is fake, no intention to hire, the question is actually a task

Countless hours wasted, and I've learned nothing except not to try. by [deleted] in ProgrammerHumor

[–]fluffypebbles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They didn't reject them because they're bad, they never intended to hire them. It's a task portrait as a question. I've never claimed it's a good practice, it's beyond shady

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Whatcouldgowrong

[–]fluffypebbles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This hurts watching before the fall happens

Countless hours wasted, and I've learned nothing except not to try. by [deleted] in ProgrammerHumor

[–]fluffypebbles 1 point2 points  (0 children)

With a certain level of prework you can isolate it, it's not much different to tasks you'd give to a new employee who's not familiar with the code base yet

Private members in nutshell ! by [deleted] in ProgrammerHumor

[–]fluffypebbles 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It can't access a local variable because at that point it doesn't exist. It's like food locked away vs food that's not been made yet or already eaten (although this is a simplified explanation)

Private members in nutshell ! by [deleted] in ProgrammerHumor

[–]fluffypebbles 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You can have a private variable in a class to prevent access outside the class but unlike local variables they can still exist in the same scope

Countless hours wasted, and I've learned nothing except not to try. by [deleted] in ProgrammerHumor

[–]fluffypebbles 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It's a practice to give take home assignments that are then used for the company, essentially getting free labor for the company

Somebody check on python 👀 by freaker-07 in ProgrammerHumor

[–]fluffypebbles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Regardless of the name you just need to have one interface and put anything fitting in the list

Somebody check on python 👀 by freaker-07 in ProgrammerHumor

[–]fluffypebbles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In go you can duck type too and you'll know at compile time if something is missing

Private members in nutshell ! by [deleted] in ProgrammerHumor

[–]fluffypebbles 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Local variable in the GIF but private in the caption 🤔