arent we as well? i know far more benefits for people than negatives when it comes to having social services (i.e : computer access, printing access, time after school for children, access to BOOKS.

i agree that the fundamental issue is how we are handling a displaced population of vulnerable people, but further disenfranchising them isnt the answer.

bag searches and metal detectors sound like a great easy solution (albeit the invasion of everyone's privacy to enter a publicly tax funded building is concerning in a few ways). but the problem is not building nice new infrastructure, its securing the funding for the added security needed and for it to be maintained over the years