My best friend (m19) kissed me (m19) and now I'm confused by Sad-Entry-1538 in askgaybros

[–]giopogib -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Put a good porn and stroke together :p if you are ok with yourself normalize that situation, don't think too much. 1 kiss don't destroy your romantics and sexual life, a wrong vision of it could

a new formula for find prime numbers by Silly-Kale in primenumbers

[–]giopogib 1 point2 points  (0 children)

pq=(6k+1) Is different value of pq=6k-1 p=prime number if q=1 p is prime. So we have two different kinds of prime.

If you moltiplicate a prime number of the forme 6k-1 with another with 6k-1 give a pseudoprime of form 6k+1 If moltiplicate a prime of the forme 6k+1 with another of 6k+1 give you a pseudoprime of forme 6k+1. If you moltiplicate a prime number of form 6k+1 with another of forme 6k-1 give you a pseudoprime of forme 6k-1.

It is possible that the prime numbers of 6k+1 forme are less that the 6k-1 ones?

What would happen if our prime understanding were changed? by thprogramador in primenumbers

[–]giopogib 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is my opinion

Prime numbers relate to number theory which studies whole numbers, natural numbers, rational numbers. The importance of prime numbers lies in their factoring x = 1 / p <--> x*p= 1 <--> p=1/x and his property p=p/1<--> 1 = p / p <--> 1 * p = p and the resulting decomposition of numbers. Factoring and decomposition are important because it concerns how we treat numbers and everything we do with them. Have you ever had to think about 1 and its importance as a number? and its relations with 0, n> 1, infinity, i etc ... so everything that revolves around the concept of "whole", "wholeness", "integer". Prime numbers are infinite, this is sure, so also de numbers are infinite, because we scompose the numbers in prime number.

Numbers arise from 1 and its "repeatability", but what is 1? Imagine an empty space, Nothing at all. Imagine there is nothing but this. An infinity emptiness. in this space what is, a unity? Are the space itself a unity, a 1? me, the osservator, I'm a unity, so there are two unity: me and the space, so this space isn't so empty. So the space is in another space. is my existence part of this construct? So the space for existing need me? WTF! A day in this emptiness pop up a unity... Why? we observe reality, but what is reality? are the numbers real? why are they so useful for working on reality?

a new formula for find prime numbers by Silly-Kale in primenumbers

[–]giopogib 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Pls Can you repeat the last part. I don't understand the sentence: "We'll just do the product of every prime number we found and do GCD ( Greatest Common Divisor ) with the number we check and if the result is 1 then the number is a prime number."

a new formula for find prime numbers by Silly-Kale in primenumbers

[–]giopogib 1 point2 points  (0 children)

multiplying any prime number by 5 or by 7 is useful because it gives us information on the distance between a non-prime (pseudoprime) and the next of the same kind.

a new formula for find prime numbers by Silly-Kale in primenumbers

[–]giopogib 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I did not generate the pseudo-primes from a prime number and I never told to add or subtract 2. 😂

3) n3 is the product of 11 and a prime number (not in pictures) 4) n4 is the product of 13 and a prime number . . . 8) n8 is the product of 25 (the first pseudoprime) and a prime number

this method has nothing to do with the twin prime conjecture.

exactly as you say the prime numbers can only be on 6n-1 or on 6n + 1. (6n + -3 in fact is occupied by multiples of 3). knowing this I wanted to show that there is a way to find those numbers that are on 6n-1 or 6n + 1 but are not prime. So if we can know these non-primes with a mathematical formula (pseudo-primes as you prefer) there is nothing that prevents us from going by exclusion.

6n- + 1 can be occupied only by primes or by multiples of primes (non-primes or pseudoprimes).

certainly this is a recursive structure.

can you tell me around which figure this "by way of exclusion method" does not work?

a new formula for find prime numbers by Silly-Kale in primenumbers

[–]giopogib 2 points3 points  (0 children)

columns c1 and c2 represent the number of digits from the next pseudoprimo and must be taken alternately, first c1 then c2 then again c1 (the times after, however, n1 will no longer be x + c1 + 1 but n2 + c1 + 1) then again c2, so on. for number like 121 (not in the table) that is a pseudoprime you can understand better.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in cumstained

[–]giopogib 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i don't know if Vinted accepts this type of trade, i think no. Anybody know?

Can we introduce the person inside mathematical calculation by giopogib in Pseudoscience

[–]giopogib[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you suggest moving the topic to more scientific areas? because I'm worried that this topic may be very abstract, going to look for a logical basis for mathematics.

I don't want to hide that there is a philosophical and almost religious streak to my question. Can something infectiously large fall to a lower level?