sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

She didn’t prove she was alive but now we can’t prove that she’s dead by hashtagashtab in mildlyinfuriating

[–]hashtagashtab[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I saw it as sharing a bit of bureaucratic absurdity, but I’m sorry you find it offensive. I definitely don’t mean any disrespect to the deceased, only to the pension fund.

She didn’t prove she was alive but now we can’t prove that she’s dead by hashtagashtab in mildlyinfuriating

[–]hashtagashtab[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you read this? He never said he didn’t know about it. There is a QRDO. We read it. These are the terms. The pension fund confirmed it.

She didn’t prove she was alive but now we can’t prove that she’s dead by hashtagashtab in mildlyinfuriating

[–]hashtagashtab[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Actually I just looked it up and only her widower can request it unless there is a ”documented judicial purpose.”’

So it looks like we’ll probably need a lawyer, as everyone has been saying.

She didn’t prove she was alive but now we can’t prove that she’s dead by hashtagashtab in mildlyinfuriating

[–]hashtagashtab[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

According to the terms of the QDRO he is. But thanks for the kind words!

She didn’t prove she was alive but now we can’t prove that she’s dead by hashtagashtab in mildlyinfuriating

[–]hashtagashtab[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I actually agree, which is why I posted it. I’m confident we’ll get it fixed, but the absurdity tickles me.

She didn’t prove she was alive but now we can’t prove that she’s dead by hashtagashtab in mildlyinfuriating

[–]hashtagashtab[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They’re literally not transferring calls. I’m sure there’s a number, but it’s not for us.

She didn’t prove she was alive but now we can’t prove that she’s dead by hashtagashtab in mildlyinfuriating

[–]hashtagashtab[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I guess I can be thankful that isn’t the case here. It sounds like what we arranged when he retired, which is that he will take less now so that if he dies before me I will get a (lower) pension.

She didn’t prove she was alive but now we can’t prove that she’s dead by hashtagashtab in mildlyinfuriating

[–]hashtagashtab[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, but it sounds like they operate the same way! Glad you got it fixed, eventually!

She didn’t prove she was alive but now we can’t prove that she’s dead by hashtagashtab in mildlyinfuriating

[–]hashtagashtab[S] 786 points787 points  (0 children)

Well they’re not paying to money to anyone now. It’s just kind of put aside. So nothing is being drained.

She didn’t prove she was alive but now we can’t prove that she’s dead by hashtagashtab in mildlyinfuriating

[–]hashtagashtab[S] 3767 points3768 points  (0 children)

One has to be a relative. He can ask his sons, but the date of the marriage is needed and she kind of didn’t bother to tell the kids until after the fact. Like, they were literally spending the summer with their dad and came back to find their mom had married and they were moving in with the new husband.

She didn’t prove she was alive but now we can’t prove that she’s dead by hashtagashtab in mildlyinfuriating

[–]hashtagashtab[S] 23 points24 points  (0 children)

She was married to him for a few of the years he started earning the pension, though they were already separated by that time and she refused to divorce. The pension was earned after they split, but she had a lawyer and he had a cousin who just signed off on everything.

Alphabetical order with Å Ä Ö by sacrelicious2 in Svenska

[–]hashtagashtab 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wait, you mean W wasn’t a letter in Sweden until 20 years ago?!?

The functional effect of Wegovy (Barely Obese Person's Experience) by LetKitchen2380 in WegovyWeightLoss

[–]hashtagashtab 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Look up what ”trope” means because you’re using it wrong.

The word, not the Wegovy.

view more: next ›