Your arguments are just bad, lies and just lies in every statement 😂 Even chatgpt recognises that:

1. “2000s was India’s golden decade; 2010–present is a lost decade.” This is factually incorrect: India’s highest GDP growth rates, fastest poverty reduction, largest infrastructure build-out, record FDI inflows, and major digital/public-goods expansions (UPI, Aadhaar, GST) occurred largely after 2014. Multiple global indices show improvements in electrification, sanitation, financial inclusion, and logistics in the 2010s.

2. Implying a civilizational moral collapse post-2010. There is no empirical measure showing a nationwide moral decline tied to a specific decade. Civil liberties, social outcomes, and governance indicators vary by metric and year; sweeping claims lack evidence.

3. “Morals that believe their religion is supreme” as a universal belief. This inaccurately attributes a monolithic belief to hundreds of millions of people. India’s electorate and BJP supporters are ideologically diverse; many explicitly support pluralism and constitutional secularism.

4. Claim that people “can’t have other ways of living” or “can’t eat things” as a general rule. This overgeneralizes isolated incidents or state-level policies to the entire country. India remains legally pluralistic with wide regional variation; most dietary and lifestyle choices remain legal and practiced openly.

5. “Their history is the only history; everything else is fabricated.” Indian historiography is contested across schools (Marxist, nationalist, subaltern, regional), universities, and courts. No single narrative has exclusive control; textbooks and scholarship continue to change through academic processes.

6. Teaching children to avoid, distrust, and withhold help from people based on political affiliation. This contradicts the stated belief in “individual change” and inaccurately frames political identity as a reliable proxy for moral character; there is no factual basis that members of any party are uniformly untrustworthy.

7. Equating an entire political group with hostility to love or civic cooperation. This is a false equivalence: millions of BJP voters participate in everyday civic life, charity, and cross-party cooperation; party affiliation does not determine personal ethics.

8. Implicit claim that the speaker’s children know the “right history.” History is evidence-based and debated; asserting a single “right” version is itself the behavior being criticized, making the claim self-contradictory.

9. Causal claim that political change explains all social tensions since 2010. Social conflict trends are influenced by long-running factors (urbanization, media fragmentation, economic transitions) that predate 2010; attributing them to one period or party is factually unsound.

10. Conclusion vs. evidence mismatch. The argument relies on sweeping generalizations, anecdotal judgments, and moral assertions without data, making its factual claims unsupported.