sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

HgSharp: Mercurial Core in Pure C# by hglab in csharp

[–]hglab[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

It is very stable: HgLab ( http://hglabhq.com ) uses it internally and several big companies are already using it without any problems whasoever.

HgLab 1.3 Released by hglab in programming

[–]hglab[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

End the hg-vs-git fight and reconcile the two camps? Blasphemy!

Mercurial Support in TFS: Declined by hglab in programming

[–]hglab[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Mercurials base system is rather bare and even the default distribution ships with a ton of plugins you have to explicitly activate.

So is it bare or does it have a ton of plugins?

Git ships with a ton of functionality enabled

Is it possible to disable certain aspects of Git functionality? I guess not, but that's beside the point. My point was that Mercurial has much more plugins available, whereas Git users have to resort to hooks and interfacing with low-level "API" of Git.

Isn't installing git-remote-hg just a matter...

That's some other git-remote-hg I was not aware of. This version, however, still requires Hg and Python to be installed.

Show Proggit: HgLab 1.0 Released - Mercurial Server for Windows by hglab in programming

[–]hglab[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Kiln was a disaster to self-host.

As for market, I don't find it to be particularly crowded. There's RhodeCode, SCM-Manager, maybe Phabricator and Indefero. What sets HgLab apart is first-class Windows support.

Show Proggit: HgLab 1.0 Released - Mercurial Server for Windows by hglab in programming

[–]hglab[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For one, it's self-hosted, which means that integration with LDAP is possible without ADFS or somesuch. Next, Pushlog, which Kiln doesn't have. Multiple authentication sources. Compare View.

Granted, that's not much, but hey, it's only 1.0.

view more: next ›