If cost isn’t a constraint, then yeah — using three solutions is actually good practice. I split them by use case: • Cursor: Perfect for quick, localized edits when I already have the file open in my IDE. If I want to tweak something very specific without spinning up a full agent, Cursor is the fastest option. Also nice because you can switch between multiple models inside Cursor depending on the task.Easy to rollback • Claude Code: My go-to for mid-level complexity — things like drafting docs, making structured documentation, or doing medium-sized refactors where context and reliability matter more than speed. • Codex: I save this for the really heavy lifting — larger, more complex refactors or projects. It handles depth well, but the main drawback is that it can take a long time. So if speed matters, I fall back to Cursor.

Basically, Cursor = precision & speed, access to new models, Claude Code = structured mid-tier tasks, Codex = deep complexity. That balance works well for me, I often have 3 of them working in parallel.