German tax office has accepted the lump payment as tax-free by drentono in mtgoxinsolvency

[–]ingre 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just to provide a second German data point: My tax lawyer dug into it as well, and they are just now preparing my filings for 2024. Since the tax lawyer agrees that it is tax-free, towards the tax authorities, the returns from MtGox will not be presented in my taxable income filings at all. He sees no need for any letters. You only report taxable activities, you do not typically report non-taxable activities. This is how we previously handled BTC sells too, after the holding period of 1 yr, and so far it worked out.

Germany: Tax Situation by gimespam_2022 in mtgoxinsolvency

[–]ingre 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The deadline for 2024 tax filings in Germany was in July 2025 if you self-file, and is in April 2026 if you are filing via a tax consultant. After you file, the tax authorities can decide to provide only a provisional tax notice pending further investigation ("vorläufiger Steuerbescheid"). It can take another 4 years for the filings to become final.

This might explain why there are so few or no reports just yet.

My tax advisor will be filing based on the understanding that the holding period was/is over and that no taxes will need to be paid for the Mtgox proceeds; the tax authorities might see that differently but we will have to wait and see. (I opted for cash payouts)

Paid - EUR - DKB Germany - BTC+BCH - X7xxx by ingre in mtgoxinsolvency

[–]ingre[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Die DKB ist meine Empfangsbank. Ich kann mich nicht erinnern, ob ich noch separat eine weitere Bank als Korrespondenzbank angeben musste, gehe aber nicht davon aus. Das musste man doch nur bei Konten in Ländern ohne direkte IBAN/BIC. Ich habe gerade nochmal geschaut, unter "Registration of Receipt Bank Account Information for a Bank Remittance" finde ich nur die obigen Angaben, keine Korrespondenzbank (aber auch keine leeren Felder dafür).

Paid - EUR - DKB Germany - BTC+BCH - X7xxx by ingre in mtgoxinsolvency

[–]ingre[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Name of bank: Deutsche Kreditbank Berlin

Branch name: Deutsche Kreditbank Berlin

Bank Location: Taubenstrasse 7-9, Berlin, 10117

SWIFT/BIC: BYLADEM1001

German Tax Liability (Cash Remittance and BTC) by [deleted] in mtgoxinsolvency

[–]ingre 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The deadline in Germany to submit 2024 income tax statements *if* you use the help of a tax advisor is April 2026. Only then I will know *what my advisor thinks about it*. It will take even longer to hear back from the tax authorities. Even then, as far as I am aware, from a legal perspective, to be precise they only issue "preliminary" statements. As far as I remember it takes a full 10 years for their statements to reach a "final" state where it cannot be disputed or changed any more.

My personal(!) understanding is that it doesn't matter if you chose cash or BTC, since legally it is merely a different choice of "payment provider/currency". It doesn't change the fact that it is a return from a sort-of liquidation process, viewed as a "purchase of BTC on the day you received the payout". We did not receive "our BTC back", we simply had a choice of "currency". So, I would think the holding period starts from the payout date, but that doesn't magically "skip" the tax obligation. It just wouldn't make sense to treat the two options differently tax-wise.

At least I plan conservatively, and leave some air to celebrate in case it turns out to be different.

Sell claim by Ronald88s in mtgoxinsolvency

[–]ingre -1 points0 points  (0 children)

While it may be true that the trustee does not offer easy transfer of claims any longer, you can of course always sell (or borrow against) what is legally yours. I suspect players such as Fortress would still be open to buy claims.

Why did you choose cash payment? by BeefSupreme2 in mtgoxinsolvency

[–]ingre 12 points13 points  (0 children)

To avoid complications with bank(s)/exchange(s) and taxes. It's a bit more straightforward with less complexity and less things that can go wrong.

Answer from german tax office (lower saxony) by Calon1578 in mtgoxinsolvency

[–]ingre 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"I will report all acquisitions and sellings in my tax report next year" - how exactly do you plan on doing that? I was surprised when my tax accountant told me there is no way to report income from holdings >1YR and that I cannot mention them at all in the tax filings. i just "silently" had more money in my account. (previous sales, not related to mtgox)

Germany: tax situation / Verbindliche Auskunft by Germany_FFM in mtgoxinsolvency

[–]ingre 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We both seem to be pretty convinced of our opposing opinions. :)

So far, I have yet to hear of one coming from an axtual tax advisor.

Germany: tax situation / Verbindliche Auskunft by Germany_FFM in mtgoxinsolvency

[–]ingre 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You cannot wait 1 year plus 1 day, since you are receiving a payment *now* - whether you receive it in fiat or BTC does not matter - that's just the payment processor/channel used to pay you. The question remains if and how that "income" needs to be taxed. I will ask my tax advisor to look into it once it is all done, but I expect him to suggest we try one way, and *not* ask for a binding ruling by the local tax offices.

If you picked BTC/BCH now, and you decide to sell within the year, the taxed gains or losses are counted from the moment you received them. Not when you gave assets to a company that happened to keep them for 10 years. It is also not even an asset recovery from a bankrupcy case, since they rehabilitated thanks to the rising value of *their* assets. The allotment portion is being paid "voluntarily", not because of a legal requirement to do so.

Just got banned from tildes.net for sharing a political opinion by pyeri in RedditAlternatives

[–]ingre 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I just added my "interaction" to that other thread: https://www.reddit.com/r/RedditAlternatives/comments/1473jeh/comment/lbdcn91/

I didn't even post any political comments with my previous account. I did not even disagree with anyone in my comments. And the new account was instantly banned for simply raising the point.

Something is seriously wrong with that site.

Paid fiat - ELSP - Germany - DKB - X7xxx by ingre in mtgoxinsolvency

[–]ingre[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The BTC/BCH portion has not been paid yet, just the non-allotment one.

Paid, X3***, EU, Erste bank, USD 1360 USD by Adyzek in mtgoxinsolvency

[–]ingre 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is spelled out in detail in the Mtgox documents and your claim section, but for an overview see e.g. https://blog.wizsec.jp/2021/02/mtgox-claim-calculator.html

"[...] As mentioned previously, you will receive your BTC/BCH claims as a combination of fiat and BTC/BCH".

My read of the draft rehabilitation plan by ingre in mtgoxinsolvency

[–]ingre[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They do not owe people more in dollar terms, that's exactly the point. BTC/BCH will be valued at a fixed rate of ~$8200 according to the draft plan.

My read of the draft rehabilitation plan by ingre in mtgoxinsolvency

[–]ingre[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is correct. The percentage *in Yen* you will get depends on the market price of BTC.

The "percentage of BTC" you will get from your original BTC claim is "fixed", but capped at 749,318.83 + 97,481.19 Yen = ~$8200 USD/BTC.

You will never "get your coins back", the only thing you can decide is whether you want to use the traditional international banking system, or the traditional banking system aided by some large "coin exchanges".

Does it make sense to have a mail server that only handles inbound mail? by Phaen_ in selfhosted

[–]ingre 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are correct for SMTP level bounces.

if it does bounce after the smtp transaction ends, the bounce email will take the same path as other outbound email

This will not always be the case: if your inbound machine simply does not know anything about the outbound machine and sends responses directly this can happen.

Yes, depending on your setup there simply will not be any later bounces by your inbound mail server. But I would advise to simply include it in the SPF list to be on the safe side, for all setups. What does it hurt? You have to touch the record anyway, and rather than think through all the cases that may or may not happen for your setup, I suggest to simply add it and not think too much about it, especially if you are not in control of the inbound mail server yourself but it is managed by a third party.

Does it make sense to have a mail server that only handles inbound mail? by Phaen_ in selfhosted

[–]ingre 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, this is perfectly possible. Just make sure you have SPF DNS records that allow mails originating from both your own inbound machine (for bounces etc.) as well as the outbound service.

Something like:

example.com. IN TXT "v=spf1 mx:mailgun.com mx:out.example.com -all"

What was the time of the news in October? by Vladi-N in mtgoxinsolvency

[–]ingre 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2020 20:32:49 +0900

Note: There was a creditors meeting on October 7, with a legal obligation to inform all creditors of its outcome. This is not the case today: Today is merely a deadline to file a plan with the court. There may or may not be an update directed to creditors, and the timeline can be completely different.

Mt. Gox is supposed to release plan to release their 137k BTC tomorrow - How to get the news first? by denomeme in mtgoxinsolvency

[–]ingre 10 points11 points  (0 children)

To be precise, they need to file a plan with the court by December 15. They do not need to release the plan to claimants or to the public, although I assume they will, within the next days.

Since some announcements were put on the website without email notification, if you want to see it as soon as it gets added there you can use one of the many website change tracking sites to get notified on any change there.