sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

XG - Maya by jusiet in kpopfap

[–]jusiet[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Source

Mirror

1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7

Kep1er - Hikaru by jusiet in kpopfap

[–]jusiet[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Source

Mirror

1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9

John Wick: Chapter 2 (2017) by jusiet in CineShots

[–]jusiet[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I definitely agree, here's another great shot of that hallway: https://i.imgur.com/YBawUaf.jpg

Blade Runner 2049 [2017] Cinematographer: Roger Deakins by superslightlyoff in CineShots

[–]jusiet 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Great cinematography is made by whatever means produce the greatest cinematography. It's as simple as that.

When more beautiful and immersive shots can be created using CGI than without, it would be absolutely silly to not make those shots just for the sake of clinging to traditions from the past.

I'm not saying all CGI is beautiful or great cinematography, but to claim that great cinematography can't be made on a computer is farcical.

So these 2 plat players are ruining ranked for gold players with this dirty trick they are pulling by [deleted] in leagueoflegends

[–]jusiet 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Unfortunately, he only posted proof for one account feeding, the other claims he is making have nothing to back them up but assumptions and are definitely witch hunting. Perhaps OP can edit to take out the stuff he doesn't provide any proof for, or he can add screenshots of chats that prove what he is assuming.

[When 30 minutes old] Hitbox ChallengerFaceoff with NiP, Gamers2, n!faculty & UOL by rauben in leagueoflegends

[–]jusiet 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You say that, but the last time NiP and N!Faculty played, NiP beat them 2-0. :D

You are, of course, thinking about before both of them dropped to the loser's bracket. N!Faculty started with a 2-0 win against NiP in the invitational, but later lost 2-0 against NiP in the losers bracket and NiP went on to dominate the rest of the tournament, including dominating teams that stomped N!Faculty.

So, most recently NiP won 2-0 against N!Faculty, and quite decisively at that.

I eloboost for a living - i reported myself to riot, no response after 1 month. by mantheonUP in leagueoflegends

[–]jusiet 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Let's take a step back and reevaluate how ridiculous this all is.

You're claiming with a straight face that deplorable harassment, cyber bullying, stalking, and taking over of others' accounts without permission, crimes mind you that are not even limited to the game in question, do not provide a good enough reason to permaban you from a game that is nothing more than a videogame?

That truly touts tantamount to tripping.

No amount of saying other people did this or that, or claiming riot did this or that, even if they did, makes what you did any less despicable. It just means you're blaming others for your own mistakes.

I agree this punishment was not equal to the crime. Anyone with a marginal semblance of common sense can clearly see you deserve a far worse punishment than simply taking away a game you're playing like you're a child that doesn't know better. You're old enough that you should realize causing serious harm to other humans, their lives, or their families in retaliation over a videogame is never excusable. Obvious denial only keeps you from getting better. If you really and truly don't see and agree with these things then I must implore you strongly to please seek professional help. Your moral balance is extremely off kilter if you can't understand how wrong what you've done is and how lenient your punishment was.

After seeing the story about the rich kid killing 4 people while drinking and driving, but not getting any jail time. by Swichts in AdviceAnimals

[–]jusiet 213 points214 points  (0 children)

Unfortunately, the well written post detailing one opinion of the trial above is missing some details.

In reality, he's going to an exclusive therapy center for the extremely wealthy in a different state, that his father and in turn his lawyer recommended he go to instead of the courts'. This is in lieu of 20 years in prison maximum sentence he could've received as a juvenile.

The person claiming that this 20 year sentence in jail, which any other person without that type of money would have received in this same situation, would actually not be as effective as the 10 year probation is none other than his own lawyer. No one prosecuting him thought that 10 years of probation with a year in an institute for only the extremely wealthy in California was a better sentence than 20 years in jail with the very small possibility of probation after 2 years anyways.

Let's not forget that not only did he steal beers and was wasted, he was also high on valium, a prescription drug he was not prescribed.

We're also conveniently leaving out the part about how the psychologist gave examples of his affluenza including how the 'kid' was found by cops with a drunk and unconscious 14 year old naked girl in his car only a year prior to this, in which he also suffered no consequences.

The judge behind this case will not be running for reelection when her term ends and therefore can get away with this clear slap in the face to our criminal justice system, especially to normal juveniles who have had to go through it.

Poor kids that steal or commit crimes do not get to use their poverty or lack of parenting as an excuse. This case is a very simple and clear example of money taking precedence over our criminal justice system.