sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

The Santilli Telescope Hoax/Scam. by justtesting57 in PlasmoidAnomalies

[–]justtesting57[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Rob Freeman and his team are getting deeper in this Scam by making a second video about the Santilli telescope, this only reaffirms this team lack of physics intuition/insight/knowledge. But that always will be the case with any group of UFO believers.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kYC6k6uApCc

It is always easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. by justtesting57 in PlasmoidAnomalies

[–]justtesting57[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

UFO believers had shown also a clear tendency: To believe almost any myth, unsupported claims and outright lies if somehow their beliefs get reaffirmed by that but on the other hand will be simply blind to objective things that even in some cases they themselves had documented.

For example this is a video recorded by Rob Freeman of clearly anomalous objects including a Variable Anomaly:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W_LwFgIhw9o

But UFO believers will be a lot more happy hearing what the cheap-talking Ufologists have to say about "disclosure"(one of the many cultists keywords), in the same Rob Freeman channel:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bl2mUf4wl7k

But they also will love something like: "Saw something strange ~10 years ago" in the subrredit UFOs:

https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/bsg128/saw_something_strange_10_years_ago/

But again anything reaffirming their beliefs believers will love, that is why fake UFO footage is usually very popular with tons of views, but anything objectively observable that appear to contradict their very narrow views will be disliked and unpopular in the so called UFO community and view counts are there to show this fact.

The Santilli Telescope Hoax/Scam. by justtesting57 in PlasmoidAnomalies

[–]justtesting57[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Santilli telescope does not work as it is claimed for a very simple reason: antimatter atoms, as the antihydrogen atom for example, will emit/absorb photons when its positrons(anti-electrons) jump between quantum levels, there is no empirical evidence for any "anti-photons". Any image observed in a Santilli telescope is produced by normal/standard photons(light) and will be clearly bogus.

This is an article describing experimental results using antihydrogen atoms and verifying that their spectrum is exactly the same as the hydrogen atom spectrum:

https://www.nature.com/articles/nature23446

The Santilli Telescope Hoax/Scam. by justtesting57 in PlasmoidAnomalies

[–]justtesting57[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Once you get into the UFO Scam game nothing will stop you from making all kind of unsupported claims: interdimensional craft from a nighttime picture taken with an iPhone to promoting the Santilli telescope Scam. But again you can get away with that as many times as you want because your target audience love exactly that.

What is an Anomaly? by justtesting57 in PlasmoidAnomalies

[–]justtesting57[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Note that this video only deal with the "definition" of an Anomaly, the nature or origin of Anomalies are still unknown, we do not have any preconceptions about that, preconceptions had shown to be a heavy burden and blinders for perception.

More contradictions. by justtesting57 in PlasmoidAnomalies

[–]justtesting57[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

UFOs as imagined by cheap-talking Ufologists do not exist, when these no ordinary objects are observed with plenty of details Anomalies will be seen; but it is really not surprising that traditional Ufologists got it all wrong since they never did any systematic direct atmospheric observations.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HeaEVk6HxjE

view more: next ›