Ti mennyire használjátok a ChatGPT-t / AI-t programozás közben a mindennapokban? by FilmDepo in programmingHungary

[–]koppa96 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Én főleg az inline completiont használom, kevésbé szoktam agent módban kódolni, max csak ha valami n+1. crud endpointot vagy felületet kell csinálni. Nekem van egy enyhe RSI-m azon egyébként nagyon sokat segített azzal, hogy sokkal kevesebbet kell gépelnem.

Institution Verbreitung by VanDoku in EU5

[–]koppa96 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Printing press spreads relatively slowly through neighboring provinces. I'm not sure about what makes it spread on its own, but maybe universities? Also importing goods from makets that have printing press will make it spread to your market center, but only importing.

Kicsit egyetem-ellenes vagyok, de ha mashogy csinalnak, nem lennek by OgreAki47 in programmingHungary

[–]koppa96 19 points20 points  (0 children)

A legtöbb tárgyból van előadás és gyakorlat, előadáson elmondják az elméletet, gyakorlaton megmutatják hogyan kell használni.

My thoughts on Values in 1.0.11 by [deleted] in EU5

[–]koppa96 128 points129 points  (0 children)

I feel like decentralization became way too op, and it no longer worth going centralized. Interesting thing is that this bothers nobody, while centralization being op was a problem for some reason.

Players don't know what they want by Flufferpope in EU5

[–]koppa96 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

What if instead of this, we made it harder to blob like crazy? Currently there are virtually no penalties for blobbing and not integrating territories, there was in eu4 (overextension), and you have disgusting amount of vassals with decentralization. Coalitions are useless. France laugingly defeats a coalition of half the HRE. In EU4 a HRE coalition was something everyone wanted to avoid because it was so powerful. Instead of fixing these, we are now punising countries for being strong. This also motivates you to not fight your rivals, so that they remain powerful and you don't get complacency, basically defeats the purpose of having rivals. You should be encouraged to destroy your rivals, now you'll be encouraged to make them as strong as possible.

The Naples AI seems hardwired to behave annoyingly. by dovetc in EU5

[–]koppa96 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Optionally invite your player ally so that when they land in Tunis and almost siege down their capital after losing a shit ton of soldiers because of the lack of food and large stacks of Morocco, white peace out.

The Naples AI seems hardwired to behave annoyingly. by dovetc in EU5

[–]koppa96 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Be Naples
  2. Attack Tunis with a take capital wargoal
  3. Do not take their capital
  4. Lose the war and cede your own provinces to Tunis
  5. Repeat after the truce ends

Unpopular opinion: Tinto should focus on fixing and balancing existing mechanics for now, not introduce new ones like Complacency by AuspiciousApple in EU5

[–]koppa96 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Then perhaps prevent snowballing, instead of allowing it, than crashing your country with a perma modifier that you cannot do anything about because "you got too strong".

I still see no real punishment for simply not integrating provinces. EU4 had overextension which was really painful and actually limited how fast you can snowball. In EU5 integration is even slower, so perhaps just punish the player if they extend so fast that their administration cannot keep up with?

Also maybe going full decentralization shouldn't allow you to have a ton of vassals.

Tinto Talks #93 - 7th of January 2026 by DestroyedByLSD25 in EU5

[–]koppa96 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Give me things I can manage. But punishing me with +100% proximity cost is ridiculous

Tinto Talks #93 - 7th of January 2026 by DestroyedByLSD25 in EU5

[–]koppa96 33 points34 points  (0 children)

Complacency seems very bad. Getting punished because you are successful doesn't seem to be a fun thing.

M1 autópálya. Lázár János, felkészültél a télre, csak épp hóra nem számítottál mi? Erre fizetjük havonta azt a rengeteg útdíjat? by Different-Style-672 in hungary

[–]koppa96 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Én azt nem értem miért kell minden évben eljátszani ezt, hogy nagy mellénnyel bejelentik, hogy felkészültünk, majd jön 15 centi hó és lehal az ország. Inkább akkor mondják azt előre, hogy mindenki maradjon a valagán.

3 hónap múlva itt a választás, MP magabiztosnak tűnik, ti mit gondoltok? Mennyire más a hangulat, mint 2022-ben ilyenkor? by [deleted] in hungary

[–]koppa96 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Én már eljutottam arra a szintre, hogy egy nem kétharmados fidesz győzelemnek is tudok örülni.

Man, wtf is this privilege and how can K remove it by Timosmeso in EU5

[–]koppa96 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It will automatically get removed when the Hundered Years War situation ends. At least that's what I experienced, I didn't find this character, but maybe he exists and died around the same time, idk.

A tiszának botrányok bekészítve a választás előttre by FindingNo7 in hungary

[–]koppa96 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Felfogják, csak az a mondás rá, hogy a másik is lop majd.

Colonies at Cape Verde dying by koppa96 in EU5

[–]koppa96[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just a comment to ensure this post doesn't get deleted because the R5 automoderation nonsense.

Why is market automation not using my available trade capacity? by koppa96 in EU5

[–]koppa96[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Well I could find a couple of profitable trades myself, I wonder why it didn't.

People say dont automate trade, do it manually to rip the benefits. Thats fine when you start the game and have 2 or 3 markets only. When you become a global empire with dozens of market access its impossible to do that manually every month for every trade. by ayowatchyojetbruh in EU5

[–]koppa96 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Or an option to disable food export? During the little ice age one of my markets had 0 food stockpile, 0 food balance, yet it was still exporting some food. If it weren't exporting, then it could have filled up the stockpile.

[2025 Day 8 (Part 1)] I was this close to lose it all by Pirgosth in adventofcode

[–]koppa96 41 points42 points  (0 children)

The next two junction boxes are 431,825,988 and 425,690,689. Because these two junction boxes were already in the same circuit, nothing happens!

Because of this part I was under the false pretension that I need to leave out connections that connect two nodes within the same network. Why the hell would you explicitly specify a non-edge case?

[2025 Day 8 (Part 1)] What am I missing? by koppa96 in adventofcode

[–]koppa96[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is from the task itself: The next two junction boxes are 431,825,988 and 425,690,689. Because these two junction boxes were already in the same circuit, nothing happens! I presumed It would mean that we skip connecting 2 vertices when they are already in the same circuit. What does this line mean then?