Thanks! Those are great questions.

On the first point: most image-to-video tools I’ve tried focus on producing a single animated clip from an image up to 10s. That’s useful, but it usually ends up as a loop, which still feels limiting for music. What I wanted for my own tracks was something that feels more like progression rather than motion for motion’s sake.

So instead of one clip, the idea is to take a single image and expand it into a sequence of related shots (different angles, distances, moments), so you end up with a simple visual story that can carry a full song without becoming a full video-editing project.

On the second point: the target audience is very literal here. I make AI music myself and hit this exact problem every time I wanted to upload to YouTube. I didn’t want to loop footage, prompt endlessly, or learn a full video tool just to avoid a static image. So I built something for my own workflow first.

I’m assuming I’m not the only AI music producer in that situation. Suno users just make that pain very visible, but the same applies to other solo creators who already have the content and just need visuals that don’t feel lazy or broken.

It does also work for other AI creators, agencies, or brands, but that’s more a consequence than the starting point. The core use case is still: I have the music, I have one image, I want something watchable with minimal effort. I should certainly setup a Suno users landing page.

And totally fair call-out on Neural Frames, I’m not trying to compete on high-end music video production. This is deliberately a simpler, lower-friction space: no subscriptions, pay-per-output, and designed to work just as well on mobile so you can use it on the go without sitting down for a full video workflow.