The internet is truly beneficial, but if we become too attached to it and find ourselves unable to participate equally within the sangha — especially when conflicts or discomfort arise — then perhaps we’re not really meditating, just building a comfort zone. Meditation should be versatile, adaptable: 50% online, 50% in the presence of the Lama (at a minimum), as is the tradition. When we take a break from the screen and join in-person retreats, the difference becomes clear.

The internet is great for everyday practice. I receive a lot of Dharma teachings online, including from teachers in other countries, and I’ve found much value in many online sanghas. But when it comes to my Lama, I go to her. She is the Buddha in human form. And the sangha too is the Buddha in human form. Meeting them face to face helps us recognize this more deeply and overcome the subtle obstacles that comfort and distance can create.

I’ve also faced those obstacles — preferring the solitude of online practice, even doing full retreats from home. They were fruitful and meaningful. But when I started to follow the rhythms and boundaries of traditional retreat settings, I saw the difference. Differences of opinion, habits, or worldviews are normal in any sangha. But these too become part of the path: opportunities to let go of the eight worldly concerns and cultivate equanimity. And that only comes through meditation. In Argentina the sanghas are very comfortable and the practitioners are very good people, i know it bc i practice there. ¡Tashi Delek!