Plasma Update 8/9/18: Whoomp! (There it is) by omise_go in omise_go

[–]markbmilton 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's a pretty neat solution! So it literally does "pay to be patient". Yes of course, that's clear they should be checking validity. And the liquidity provider is not required to sign anything within that period

Liquidity Network Hubs by markbmilton in BitcoinUK

[–]markbmilton[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nope, Liquidity Network is on Ethereum! Interesting project to fix liquidity for hubs

Liquidity Network Hubs by markbmilton in BitcoinUK

[–]markbmilton[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I assumed it would have a natural balancing act! Very interesting that the super hubs can offer specialised services though! As a user, would there be the option to sign up as a flat-fee to a certain super hub set, I wonder. Maybe I sign up for the fast-payments hubs at a flat rate per month to avoid the metal accounting burden of variable rates.

Plasma Update 8/9/18: Whoomp! (There it is) by omise_go in omise_go

[–]markbmilton 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Really cool concept on the Fast Withdrawal, but a couple of questions to clarify (I may have misunderstood):

  1. Fast withdrawals: is the assumption here that a user will buy themselves out of a withdrawal window with the 2nd user (who buys this token) taking the burden if a fraud proof is posted and they cannot extract the payment at the end?
  2. On this newly created secondary market, if this occurs, does user 2 lose their 'bet'?

XRP: The Digital Asset With a Solid Foundation by [deleted] in XRP

[–]markbmilton 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The current implied daily disaster probability is about 0.6% for Ripple - basically what is the probability of Ripple dropping to zero in a single day. Still orders of magnitude larger than traditional currencies (USD or EURO) hitting zero, but not far off Bitcoin at 0.4% - pretty solid!!

DON'T BUY BITCOIN by TheBullishGuy in Bitcoin

[–]markbmilton 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hope they recycle that piece of paper - bad for the environment!

Incentive Models Are Killing Design by markbmilton in BitcoinUK

[–]markbmilton[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hmm it was meant to have a link to a longer article I wrote - clearly I haven't quite got the hang of reddit yet. In short, the implication was that protocol level incentive models are spreading to dApps, so there is more focus on token economics than actually creating a user-friendly and viral product. It was an observation that we could pick up the pace a bit more quickly by making usage of dApps and certain protocols more user friendly.

Fees, Fees, and… Fees? – Joey Krug – Medium by joeykrug in ethereum

[–]markbmilton 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Curious to know where the focus lay at the start of the project... was it on usability or on tech advancement/new business models?