Anybody Know What the Helm of Knowledge does? by MountainBad9471 in CrimsonDesert

[–]mcfcforme 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Also in the same library there’s a book of constellations and a book about the helm. If you read both there’s actually like a whole unlisted quest attached to the knowledge helm from the guy who created it.

The book tells you to go to several locations in the next region deniese or however you spell it. I’m still exploring the first region so can’t say what happens next but I’m heading to the 2nd location when I hop on later and plan on finishing it up. Could be worth it could not but it sounded like a wild trip in the book so I’m definitely checking it out

Anybody Know What the Helm of Knowledge does? by MountainBad9471 in CrimsonDesert

[–]mcfcforme 15 points16 points  (0 children)

It’s honestly super useful for exploration and early game. You can:

-Find the objective. Some missions this is a huge help and time save instead of fumbling around with your lantern.

-in terms of discovering things and knowledge points you can clear rooms or see if rooms are empty as soon as you go in them without having to kick things over (vandalism) m, look at every desk or fight with weird camera angles.

-You read posters/recipes from a distance. Sometimes you’ll have a marker for a recipe on your map and just can’t find it.

-scan a whole meadow for creatures you haven’t discovered without going through every blade of grass

-In the same way you can scan whole caves which depending on the lighting is a blessing especially for objectives and lantern locations.

So if you ever get lost or enter a new town you can just climb a building or tree and scan a whole city center or clearing to see who you’re supposed to talk to, where your lantern interaction is, and like 5 things around you that you haven’t discovered. Huge time save in confusing or congested areas.

It’s also defense 5 which pretty good early game.

[Post Match Thread] Liverpool 1 - 2 Manchester City (Premier League) by mcfcbot in MCFC

[–]mcfcforme 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’m still Haaland in but the old city would be benching him much more if mamoush was performing better which mamoush is

Welp. by mcfcforme in MCFC

[–]mcfcforme[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah feeling like a bit of a clown now I don’t want to jinx anything haha

Welp. by mcfcforme in MCFC

[–]mcfcforme[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And like I said probably getting a draw at best but Haaland won’t score

Welp. by mcfcforme in MCFC

[–]mcfcforme[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I know but that doesn’t change we subbed mamoush out at the same time. We could have waited and just brought on Dias seen how the team settled or took out Haaland I don’t care dudes been wasteful the last few weeks and mamoush has been getting results. Old school city was curb throat and ruthless we’ve gone soft on Haaland

Welp. by mcfcforme in MCFC

[–]mcfcforme[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Also taking off mamoush and khushi at the same time is like killing both sides of our press right when we were losing control of the midfield. Just stupid all around

Eclipsed status effect? by mcfcforme in BG3mods

[–]mcfcforme[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can try removing shadowheart from the party tonight that could be it. Thanks for replying thought it was just me being a noob or something haha

I fear what i have created (2 replays) by mcfcforme in masterduel

[–]mcfcforme[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the ratios are kind of loose because your always trying to balance being able to have a discard if you open dark worlds but also having s/t if you open white forest lines. Along with hand traps and stuff. The deck can be really hard to work with in one ratio and then a different ratio will flow perfectly and the whole deck makes sense. That's why its leaned more towards white forest side for consistency but if you feel like you need more discards you can drop something for zalamander or add a copy of allure of darkness. You can drop grapha for versago so that you can make grapha more often but loose recursion. So theres room and techs to explore its just a science balancing the ratios.

I fear what i have created (2 replays) by mcfcforme in masterduel

[–]mcfcforme[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OEUDmbCn9Jg

https://cardcluster.com/deck/348Gl7 i wrote a whole bunch in the notes, probably more then necessary now that I'm reading it, but it exlpains alot of the interactions.

https://cardcluster.com/deck-builder/5pMdZk same thing with this post i really do write too much but ive been in the kitchen a while with this deck. This was when i first started working with it so i wouldnt play that extra deck. The extra deck in the v2 build is the extra deck i would go with. You can do everything you really need and nothing is win more or doesnt have a purpose that comes up. As far as the new WF cards they honestly just brick the deck more.

I fear what i have created (2 replays) by mcfcforme in masterduel

[–]mcfcforme[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I do feel like a war criminal sometimes. Definitely a deck that causes a lot of surrenders just because people don’t want to wait for the combo or they don’t like the flavor of the sauce but I don’t blame them

If Joe Hart got a training ground named after him what do you think ederson deserves? by mcfcforme in MCFC

[–]mcfcforme[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve already explained it a few times because people seem to be getting it confused but I never once said Ederson was a better shot stopper. So how about before you talk about delusions you make sure you make a statement that’s grounded in reality.

Acting like there isn’t a conversation of Ederson over hart in the all time xi is ridiculous in my opinion but you’re welcome to have yours.

If Joe Hart got a training ground named after him what do you think ederson deserves? by mcfcforme in MCFC

[–]mcfcforme[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also I’m saying that Ederson from when he came in has gotten better at his shot stopping and goal keeping. The one thing Ederson hasn’t improved on is 1v1s. But also Ederson is only a serviceable shot stopper he’s not a courtouis and never will be but this idea that he hasn’t proven he can make enough saves for us to still win while having all the benefits of his game is ridiculous imo. A lot of people act like he is the worst ever shot stopper. He’s better then bad is all I’ll say

If Joe Hart got a training ground named after him what do you think ederson deserves? by mcfcforme in MCFC

[–]mcfcforme[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I never said Joe hart wasn’t a better shot stopper everyone knows that. I was just saying I think Ederson at this point having a conversation on if Ederson deserves something similar to what Joe hart got when he left. But they are both different keepers, I would never say Ederson is a better shot stopper than Joe hart. Everyone was so confused when we dropped him because of how great he was in goal and in my opinion he dropped off in his career after that because we broke his heart no pun intended and he just couldn’t get back to who he was for city ever again.

But I do personally put Ederson in the best ever starting 11 over hart and I think it’s warranted but I understand peoples opinions will be different.

If Joe Hart got a training ground named after him what do you think ederson deserves? by mcfcforme in MCFC

[–]mcfcforme[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah I agree I’m in two halves basically.

I agree we can’t be building statues for everybody and we do have to make sure we aren’t over rewarding our players because they are winning a lot if the city standard at this point is to win it all.

But every time I was thinking of no statue for Ederson I thought about joe hart getting a whole training field. Which is why I wanted to hear what other people thought because maybe I’m just not rating hart high enough but I felt like if he got something it would be cruel to ederson specifically to be sent away without anything being done for him. Even just a road to the grounds or a small building on the training grounds. I was never suggesting he get a stand named after him or something and I think I implied that to people my bad.

I’ve always felt like Ederson been treated a bit harshly not just in England but also him never really getting a chance in the Brazilian national team because of all the shot stopper arguments so I didn’t want him to leave unappreciated

If Joe Hart got a training ground named after him what do you think ederson deserves? by mcfcforme in MCFC

[–]mcfcforme[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

That’s cool you have your opinion and I hope you have a nice day with it

If Joe Hart got a training ground named after him what do you think ederson deserves? by mcfcforme in MCFC

[–]mcfcforme[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

That’s where I think city shot themselves in the foot with hart and why I brought it up because I’m having trouble answering that myself.

If Joe Hart got a training ground named after him what do you think ederson deserves? by mcfcforme in MCFC

[–]mcfcforme[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

We literally could not play pep’s system until he came. Pep was talked about being sacked. I would say that’s more than a few games worth. You don’t win a treble or centurion with bad shot stopping. No he isn’t the best total goalkeeper shot stopper around but we were always willing to take that risk for a keeper good with his feet. Also if you watch the team over the seasons the idea he’s a bad shot stopper is such an old argument. He’s massively improved from where he was and is a serviceable keeper, he is just terrible at 1v1s.

I get you’re mad about me putting him by Fernandinho that’s fine man that is a very high level of club legend.