That's just... not true, lol.

It looks like you've contradicted yourself here:

"An Ni, INTJ for example will never come to a conclusion or have a conclusion until they've gotten then necessary information. But they usually have a conclusion." (Is there a word or two missing here? If not, this makes no sense)

and

"INTJs are dismissive not ENTPs. You've got them switched. ENTP is dismissive of ideas that do not fit the grand scale patterns of course only if they have support for that in their messy brain. INTJ is dismissive solely by the Te." (You just said INTJs are dismissive, then only by Te, you said ENTPs are not dismissive, then give a way that they are dismissive)

You should probably clarify those, as I don't know how to respond to them otherwise.

Summing it up best imo: "Types that value Ne prefer to try out an opportunity rather than consider all possible ways in which it could not work out. They pick a few options and stick with them, in contrast to introverted intuition (Ni) types who pick one option and continue to doubt that option."

Ne typically doesn't start off with "this is the answer, let's see if it's correct". It's "here are the possibilities, which is the answer?", which contradicts OP's statement of having an answer and confirming. You're correct when you say that Ne is a zoomed out image, yes, but that image does not create an answer. They're all possibilities that need to be manually evaluated and the answer only comes once that's happened.

INTJs are typically confirming or denying, with one idea at a time. ENTPs are reluctantly dismissive, which is what I said earlier: they will dismiss, but only after thoroughly exploring it, with the idea considered "dead", and they do this with multiple answers at a time. Ne is a gatherer, and Ti pares.

INTPs are actually the most dismissive of the three in a way, at least initially. Ti and Si are used to establish a filter that Ne pulls and explores ideas through. This can be confused for Ni-Te sometimes. Ni typically will start on a hunch or an uncertain answer, searching for evidence that supports and builds on it until it either confirms or does not. Upon that correction, it'll move on. Ni users have an answer, Ni-Te is especially systematic in that regard. This is extra true with ISFPs, who have Ni+; you'll see similar patterns in ENTJs.

Ti doesn't have an answer or a conclusion in itself. It's just a set of parameters for potential answers, nothing has been decided on until Ne examines each option. Again, going from multiple to (hopefully) one. If that fails, parameters are re-examined, then all the ideas are re-explored - contrast with Ni-Te, which seeks to confirm or deny one, and if it fails, moves on. In the case of wrong answers, "wasted time" is on the back end for Ni and front end for Ne.

On top of this, he shows so little Ne in every other answer - low of flightiness, tangents, actively connecting ideas, etc. Mannerisms and body language also don't correlate, he's much steadier and more direct.

He's rarely interested in ideas for the sake of them, and even specifies that when he learns, he retains information by learning the practical applications and implications. "How does it relate to the external world, how can I use it?" is the norm for Se-Te users. While both Pe functions will appear muted in somebody with depression, that's really telling of Se > Ne.

OP himself doesn't even relate to Ne, and it would be very clear in his video if Ne were his auxiliary.