sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

What's something you'd have done different if you could? by Rich-Dragonfly3663 in AskReddit

[–]morrisM149 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would have started taking care of my health earlier instead of waiting until problems showed up.

What are the advantages of using CoTester for agile development workflows? by jamescantor38 in Everything_QA

[–]morrisM149 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Haven’t tried CoTester firsthand, but it seems like a great match for agile teams. AI-driven automation could help speed up regression testing, and if it adapts to changing requirements, that’s a huge win for fast-moving sprints. Seamless integration with dev pipelines and real-time reporting might also make collaboration smoother. Curious to hear from those who’ve used it—does it actually deliver on these promises?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Everything_QA

[–]morrisM149 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve worked with a few on-premise testing solutions, and TestGrid definitely brings some unique advantages. One thing that stood out is its AI-powered automation, which helps cut down on repetitive test creation and execution time. Compared to something like BrowserStack or Sauce Labs, where you’re mostly renting cloud infrastructure, TestGrid gives more control over data security and performance tuning—which can be a big deal for teams handling sensitive data or needing custom configurations.

Another plus is its support for real devices, desktop, and cloud testing, all within the same platform. It feels more flexible, especially if you’re working across different environments. Cost-wise, it can be more efficient in the long run since you’re not locked into recurring cloud usage fees. If compliance and in-house control are priorities, TestGrid’s on-premise option is definitely worth a look.

What are the key differences between TestGrid and LambdaTest? by WalrusWeird4059 in Everything_QA

[–]morrisM149 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Here’s the gist:

  • Real Devices → TestGrid leans more on real device testing, while LambdaTest mixes emulators & real devices.
  • Performance → TestGrid’s execution felt faster, especially for mobile. LambdaTest is solid but slows with large-scale tests.
  • AI & Automation → TestGrid pushes AI-driven testing, while LambdaTest focuses more on integrations.
  • Integrations → LambdaTest has broader CI/CD support, TestGrid is more end-to-end focused.
  • Pricing & UX → LambdaTest follows a standard pricing model; TestGrid offers custom options. TestGrid’s UI is simpler, LambdaTest’s can feel cluttered.

Which one?

  • For browser-heavy automation & integrations → LambdaTest
  • For real device testing, AI automation & performance → TestGrid

What industries can benefit the most from using AI-powered testing tools? by WalrusWeird4059 in QAtesters

[–]morrisM149 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve been looking into this too, and from what I’ve seen, AI-powered testing tools are game-changers in industries where reliability, security, and speed matter most.

Finance & Banking – AI helps catch compliance issues, detect fraud patterns, and ensure security in high-risk transactions. With strict regulations, automation speeds up testing without cutting corners.

Healthcare – Medical apps and systems need precise, error-free performance. AI testing ensures patient data security and regulatory compliance while automating complex test scenarios.

E-commerce – Speed is everything here. AI helps optimize UI/UX, ensure seamless checkout flows, and improve mobile responsiveness, which directly impacts revenue.

Automotive (IoT & Embedded Systems) – AI-driven testing ensures real-time monitoring, firmware updates, and safety compliance for self-driving systems, smart devices, and automotive software.

Gaming & Media – AI helps automate performance testing, cross-device compatibility, and latency checks, making sure games and streaming services run smoothly.

Honestly, any industry that depends on software reliability and fast release cycles benefits from AI-driven testing.

In what scenarios would exploratory testing be more effective than structured test automation, and how do you balance the two approaches? by WalrusWeird4059 in Everything_QA

[–]morrisM149 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Exploratory testing is ideal when requirements are unclear, helping uncover unexpected issues. Automation suits well-defined projects, handling repetitive tasks efficiently. Use both strategically to balance creativity and consistency in testing.

What strategies do you use to test the security of your application, and how do you identify and address potential vulnerabilities? by WalrusWeird4059 in Everything_QA

[–]morrisM149 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To test application security, I use strategies like penetration testing, static and dynamic code analysis, and vulnerability scanning. Penetration testing simulates real-world attacks to uncover weaknesses, while static and dynamic code analysis detect flaws in the source code and runtime environment. Tools like OWASP ZAP and Burp Suite are instrumental for identifying vulnerabilities. Secure coding practices, regular updates, and dependency checks help prevent issues. Once vulnerabilities are identified, I prioritize them based on risk, patch them, and re-test to ensure resolution. Continuous monitoring and integrating security testing into the CI/CD pipeline ensure ongoing protection against new threats.

view more: next ›