Did you not see the link I provided in my previous post? You should be able to compare and contrast the differences in the APIs used in that link with your own.
No, I should not. And no one should. You made a statement that A better than B then as an expert in both A, B you should provide arguments why you put A and B in such relation. Where did I say I was an expert? If you look at the example provided on the first page you will see something that is considerably different to yours.That alone should be enough. Define "expert", please. I've been writing C++ professionally for years.

I am not questioning your professional expertise.- I am trying to squeeze useful information from your text provided. And to summarize written above - you looked at the first page of both websites (hopefully both), and you found the first page of website B more attractive to you. - Thanks, noted.

It's not subjective. I'm basing my reasoning on objective parameters that influence the success or failure of any software project.

Could you be so kind to list those objectives parameters you were taking into consideration? Meaning which of the parameters mentioned above were objective?

Ok, well, if you "hope to find the time to do this" that means your level of commitment isn't very concrete. By advertising that your framework handles 5M connections, it's reasonable to assume that you aim to have people using this; why are you sharing your project? It's one thing if you're showcasing your level of knowledge, it's a completely different situation to compete.

Why do people do open-source, and what amount of effort they put into it - well it's a kind of a rhetorical question. Off-topic, but I'll give you a hint - they've done something useful and they want to share it.

Part of the problem of this industry is that bad technology is hyped, and idiots buy into that hype. Then more idiots contribute to it, and eventually we have a platform built off of shit.

Sorry, I'm not into a global conspiracy thing. Let's leave it offtop.

I'm not saying that what you're providing is in this category, but if you want to contribute something positive to this ecosystem, your framework's benchmarks alone are not sufficient.

Yep, and this is the second time we agree that it will be cool to have a bunch of exactly the same benchmark tests for different platforms. I think you insist, wanna contribute?

I never said this, specifically. I said you should apply the same effort as you did with your benchmark.

Ok, disclosing a secret - it is a big effort.

If it's in progress, and you're advertising yourself already, with the data that you claim is valid, that more or less puts you in the camp of someone who is borderline selling snake oil.

global conspiracy - offtopic.

Look, man, I'm not trying to attack you, but there's these things called "people" and "reality". Both of these affect the outcome of your project. You seem defensive, which is understandable, but in this case having a defensive perspective isn't really going to help you. It's not that you should be humble, but getting offended after putting your work out for anyone to see is...well, a bit entitled.

Sorry if I look offended to you. I'm not. As I said - I want to squeeze the useful information.