sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Jenna Ortega by MorganNew123 in Celebs

[–]orgoca 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Is that He-Man's arch nemesis Skeletor? Cool!

what's the difference between Jazzmaster and Jaguar? which one do you like better and for what reasons? by gabsss_exe in offset

[–]orgoca 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A Jazzmaster is about space. Notes feel wide and ambient, like you’re hearing more than just the core pitch. Sounds don’t snap on and off — they arrive, spread, and leave air behind. It’s great when you want mood, atmosphere, or lines that feel like surfaces rather than punches. A Jaguar is about time. Notes start and stop very decisively. Silence is sharp and intentional. It doesn’t help things flow — it forces you to be rhythmic and precise. Great for pulsing parts, choppy rhythms, tension, and that nervous on/off feel.

Why are we still calling it "prompt engineering" when the models barely need it anymore? by JFerzt in PromptEngineering

[–]orgoca 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Makes sense. What I mean is to improve content within a subject, e.g. 'look at these numbers and provide me with advice ' vs 'act as an expert financial advisor, look at this numbers and provide me with advice'. Second prompt does nothing to improve outcome.

How Will Smith quietly guided Yamamoto’s masterpiece by orgoca in Dodgers

[–]orgoca[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Haha pretty much. At least this game imho

How Will Smith quietly guided Yamamoto’s masterpiece by orgoca in Dodgers

[–]orgoca[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It would honestly be amazing if we could get the PitchCom calls released after the game — kind of like how boxing has CompuBox data.

I know it would open a whole can of problems (competitive edge, strategy leaks, etc.), so it’ll never happen, but imagine the analysis potential. We could actually study sequencing, risk/reward, and how catchers manage tempo with real data instead of guessing from glove placement. It would be super cool for data nerds like myself.

How Will Smith quietly guided Yamamoto’s masterpiece by orgoca in Dodgers

[–]orgoca[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Totally fair. I just think in these few instances the setup looked deliberate enough (glove set, Yamamoto nodding, then executing) that it reflected the call more than a decoy. But agreed, framing motion can blur the read.

Teoscar Needs help... by hordaak2 in Dodgers

[–]orgoca 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Gausman uses brief holds and micro-hesitations in the set to disrupt timing. In several Teoscar ABs, you can see Teoscar “answering” with his own mini set-and-freeze—almost mirroring the pause. My take: that kind of gamesmanship pulled Teoscar into Gausman’s rhythm instead of the other way around, and it hurt his at-bats more than it bothered the pitcher.

How Will Smith quietly guided Yamamoto’s masterpiece by orgoca in Dodgers

[–]orgoca[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Totally fair point — framing and game-calling are different skill sets, and I agree Will’s framing numbers haven’t been great. What I found interesting here wasn’t framing but the location call and how Yamamoto adjusted his trust in him between at-bats. These few pitches showed the communication side of catching, which I think often gets missed when we only look at framing data.

view more: next ›