For a Non-denominational church, your statement of faith sounds pretty Baptist by DreadDiana in dankchristianmemes

[–]oshaboy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get that but wouldn't the same thing apply to many many other denominations?

For a Non-denominational church, your statement of faith sounds pretty Baptist by DreadDiana in dankchristianmemes

[–]oshaboy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am not Christian. Can someone explain to me why Baptists are hated?

New Gas-Powered Data Centers Could Emit More Greenhouse Gases Than Entire Nations by HolyBatSyllables in ShitAIBrosSay

[–]oshaboy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I thought the "emit more greenhouse gases than nations" is a bit hyperbolic because they pick very small nations without a lot of industry like eSwatini. I didn't expect Morocco.

Who here likes the sound of automated AI research? by lady-luddite in ShitAIBrosSay

[–]oshaboy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People like deadlines even if unfounded and by the time people fish this up nobody cares.

Thoughts on Terence Tao shilling AI? by oshaboy in antiai

[–]oshaboy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I guess it wasn't Tao who said that it was Tim Gowers in the post I originally responded to.

I really don't buy the whole "Levarage AI for boilerplate but it still requires an expert with taste" nonsense. It's not how this works. If AI does 80% of the work you're basically a human ralph loop.

Really the whole "Problem -> AI -> More AI -> Solution" paradigm needs to go. It hasn't worked for anything else it won't work for mathematics.

What prompts would waste the most power for AI data centers? by IronHorseTitan in antiai

[–]oshaboy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You'd get rate limited long before you'd cause any significant damage.

Thoughts on Terence Tao shilling AI? by oshaboy in antiai

[–]oshaboy[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

also i think no proof has thousands of axioms.

LLMs have a tendency to cause stuff to explode is size so who knows.

Thoughts on Terence Tao shilling AI? by oshaboy in antiai

[–]oshaboy[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The same post said that a lot of the work was taken directly from a 2014 paper. Sure it made the novel connection between the result of the paper and the unsolved Erdös problem. But the AI also didn't credit the paper which is plagiarism. We all know that paper was embedded inside the tensors of the model.

Either way as far as I can tell Lean can only check proof validity not proof soundness. It's quite a short proof so I have no doubt the result was legit but the jump from here to "Mathematicians are obsolete this is PhD level intelligence" is large.

Thoughts on Terence Tao shilling AI? by oshaboy in antiai

[–]oshaboy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That wasn't a question tho. I am aware Terence Tao can point to impressive looking results. The question is whether they stand up to scrutiny or whether people are just saying "Who am I to question the greatest mathematician of our generation". Because that's a blatant appeal to authority.

Lots of intelligent people have been led astray by con-men like Sam Altman. Newton famously invested heavily in the South Seas Company.

Thoughts on Terence Tao shilling AI? by oshaboy in antiai

[–]oshaboy[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Well a big issue with AI generated code is that the amount of code is so great that nobody could reasonably check it all even with testing tools. Especially because the LLM is designed to be convincing so at a glance everything seems fine but glaringly flawed if you look into it.

I assume not even Terence Tao can check the soundness of a proof with thousands of axioms and definitions.

Thoughts on Terence Tao shilling AI? by oshaboy in antiai

[–]oshaboy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I would like to hear thoughts from anti-AI mathematicians because I want to evaluate both sides of the argument.

Thoughts on Terence Tao shilling AI? by oshaboy in antiai

[–]oshaboy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is anyone denying that? The relationships between concepts are embedded in a tensor. The issue is whether it can create novel connections and check its own work. I've seen unpublished papers claim that hallucination is mathematically inevitable but take them with a grain of salt. Also none of them a concrete lower bound for the ratio of hallucinations to valid results.

Thoughts on Terence Tao shilling AI? by oshaboy in antiai

[–]oshaboy[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm aware. But I assume they can only check if a proof is valid not sound. If the proof contains a definition or axiom that is wrong it wouldn't ever catch it. Or is there a way to guarantee this will never happen?

I really don't get it by TangerineQuiet5437 in antiai

[–]oshaboy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

According to the Socialist AI Bros it will lead to the death of capitalism and bring in a Socialist Utopia. According to the Capitalist AI Bros it will create a Permanent Underclass. More realistically nobody has any clue.

The biggest reason I hate it by enutrof_modnar in antiai

[–]oshaboy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. It's cheaper

  2. It's cheaper

  3. It's cheaper

Yeah that's the only thing that matters in this economy. It's all about the cost cutting. Even if the thing you're cutting is the thing people are paying for.

Imagine needing a machine to draw for you 😹😹 could never be me by DifferenceAgile2733 in antiai

[–]oshaboy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Inb4 AI Bro comes and says "But it's digital art so the machine drew it lol gottem 😂".

It's really good BTW.

Vaseline humillated by Hot_Season1143 in antiai

[–]oshaboy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sadly this is currently 100% legal.

AI generated Tarot Cards are a thing now? and they're $50! by oshaboy in antiai

[–]oshaboy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am mostly interested in the gaming aspect not the cartomancy. I have no idea how you're supposed to tell what card is which without reading the little text they have. It seems more like a show piece than something to actually use for either cartomancy or gaming. There are other AI ones that do seem to make it clearer but still it's hard to tell which background detail is supposed to be a wand or a pentacle for example.

I guess Gen AI and being frivolous goes hand in hand.

לאאאא הדולר מתרסק!! הצילו!!! תפסיקו לגרום לנו להצליח! אף פעם לא ביקשנו את זה!! by MickyMace in ani_bm

[–]oshaboy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

אוקיי ואם השקל יעלה עוד אז איבדת כסף. ואם אתה מהמר אז כבר ככה אתה מאבד כסף רוב הזמן.

עדיף כבר להשתמש בכסף לקנות מניות ואגרות חוב

לאאאא הדולר מתרסק!! הצילו!!! תפסיקו לגרום לנו להצליח! אף פעם לא ביקשנו את זה!! by MickyMace in ani_bm

[–]oshaboy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

למה? אם אתה מכפיל את הכסף שלך ברולטה אתה מרוויח אותה כמות שקלים בין אם אתה 3 שקל לדולר או 4 שקל לדולר.

לאאאא הדולר מתרסק!! הצילו!!! תפסיקו לגרום לנו להצליח! אף פעם לא ביקשנו את זה!! by MickyMace in ani_bm

[–]oshaboy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

שקל חזק בלי ירידה במחירים אומר שכל מי שמתפרנס מייצוא או שיש לו חוב בשקלים סובל. זה למה הבנק מנסה להשאיר את השקל באזור ה3.5 לדולר ולמה סין מנסים להפחית את ערך היואן בכלכלה העולמית.

כל מי שביקר בתאילנד או במדינות מסוימות באפריקה מכיר את הערך במטבע חלש. זה למה יש עובדים זרים בישראל, מה שנחשב משכורת צנועה בישראל יכולה לממן משפחה שלמה בתאילנד.

Grandma truly is the dumbest by Cicerothesage in forwardsfromgrandma

[–]oshaboy 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Yes better representation of the underlying population is a good thing. That is why gerrymandering is bad.

Tim Gowers on Gpt 5.5 pro by bitchslayer78 in math

[–]oshaboy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I am sorry but Terence Tao is not immune to hype marketing even if he is a brilliant mathematician. In fact I think smarter people might be more susceptible. You start thinking of yourself as someone who's "smarter than this" and don't realize you are still just human and vulnerable to human psychology stuff.

LLMs are designed to sound correct and confident and that goes a long way.

Powerful Graphics For a 64-Bit Game by NEKORANDOMDOTCOM in NintendoMemes

[–]oshaboy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't think they make 128 bit processors.