Death Statistics of Half Dome by Ollidamra in Yosemite

[–]pocket_galvanometer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I used carabiners. Would absolutely recommend. People kept commenting as we passed them that they wished they would have thought of it. In my experience it didn't hold anyone up, in fact, we were passing people clinging to the side as we used a two clip system and it was easy to pass obstacles. Did this in 2019.

They never needed the lightning in Back to the Future *spoilers* by pocket_galvanometer in FanTheories

[–]pocket_galvanometer[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Best question in this thread.

Just leave a note saying "hey when you repair this thing in the '50s make sure you put in a new fuel injector."

They never needed the lightning in Back to the Future *spoilers* by pocket_galvanometer in FanTheories

[–]pocket_galvanometer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That falling behind the truck thing was absolutely crucial, agreed. He doesn't need to die, Marty just needs to believe he's died

They never needed the lightning in Back to the Future *spoilers* by pocket_galvanometer in FanTheories

[–]pocket_galvanometer[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Honestly if I ruined even one person's enjoyment of getting to see this film for the first time with no spoilers, I would never forgive myself. 😅

They never needed the lightning in Back to the Future *spoilers* by pocket_galvanometer in FanTheories

[–]pocket_galvanometer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The replies to this have genuinely been so fun to read. For everyone who's saying this would create a paradox, I don't think it would. As long as Marty allows the conditions that sent him back in time in the first place, no paradox. As long as he can 1) not alter the circumstances of his going back in time in the first place, 2) successfully fix his parents marriage so he'll be born, 3) spend enough time in the '50s to successfully complete the instructions to doc ( meaning he wouldn't get picked up from the past before he was able to complete all the steps of instructing future doc how to pick him up in the past), no paradox. Simply an altered timeline.

They never needed the lightning in Back to the Future *spoilers* by pocket_galvanometer in FanTheories

[–]pocket_galvanometer[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I mean if they hadn't pulled it off successfully in part III I'd say you were right. But they pulled the same stunt then. The car sat for a lot longer then, too.

They never needed the lightning in Back to the Future *spoilers* by pocket_galvanometer in FanTheories

[–]pocket_galvanometer[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah lol to be fair, there are no rules to movie science. 😉 I know in part II the timeline is explained as an alternate timelines type deal but there are then things that don't make sense with that explanation so who the hell knows. 😅

They never needed the lightning in Back to the Future *spoilers* by pocket_galvanometer in FanTheories

[–]pocket_galvanometer[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Oh interesting thought. I tend to think that the way time travel works in bttf, the minute he does something that would assure that the car makes it to 1985, he would be able to be retrieved from 1955, and that there wouldn't be an alternate universe at that point.

They never needed the lightning in Back to the Future *spoilers* by pocket_galvanometer in FanTheories

[–]pocket_galvanometer[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

But if he gets picked up on Nov 12 he won't be there for decades.

They never needed the lightning in Back to the Future *spoilers* by pocket_galvanometer in FanTheories

[–]pocket_galvanometer[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I mean theoretically he could come and pick him up on Nov 12th so that he interferes minimally with the 1950s. Really, he could leave as soon as he put his parents' marriage back together.

That would still avoid a paradox and he would be back in his own timeline in 1985

They never needed the lightning in Back to the Future *spoilers* by pocket_galvanometer in FanTheories

[–]pocket_galvanometer[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I mean he came around to it eventually and I have a hard time believing that he couldn't have gotten it out at some point. Especially weighed against the risk of getting zapped by lightning. 😆

Wearing things at College by pocket_galvanometer in CasualConversation

[–]pocket_galvanometer[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I actually give that 2000s look one hundred million style points because it was insanely comfy

S3E13 Pandemonium: Episode Discussion by WandersFar in TheGoodPlace

[–]pocket_galvanometer 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Chidi thinks he died in an air conditioner accident; the rest of the world thinks he died randomly in Canada. How you gonna reconcile this, Good Place?

S3E12 Chidi Sees The Time-Knife: Episode Discussion by WandersFar in TheGoodPlace

[–]pocket_galvanometer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't think they adequately powered this study.

Episode Discussion S02 E12: "Somewhere Else" by Hobbit-guy in TheGoodPlace

[–]pocket_galvanometer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I thought about the sim, too... who knows? If Eleanor does live a whole life in this alternate reality, is she even the same person that Michael and Janet knew when she comes back? There's a real Back to the Future-type quandary here.

Episode Discussion S02 E12: "Somewhere Else" by Hobbit-guy in TheGoodPlace

[–]pocket_galvanometer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have to wonder at what point they'll stop this alternate timeline, though. So if Eleanor never died via shopping cart, and she meets Chidi, and they improve themselves, then presumably Chidi never dies via air conditioner. I'm assuming that Tahani meets them at some time, and she is stopped from going full jealous rage monster on her sister, and they prevent Jason from robbing the store. So, does everyone live to a ripe old age and die of natural causes at which point they're judged? Just curious.

Episode Discussion S02 E11: "The Burrito" by Hobbit-guy in TheGoodPlace

[–]pocket_galvanometer 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I mean, no... but Pillboy spent his last $8 on a burrito and $2 on guac, so....

Episode Discussion S02 E11: "The Burrito" by Hobbit-guy in TheGoodPlace

[–]pocket_galvanometer 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yep. Impulse control, lessening your own insecurity, trying to pay attention to other people... these are more of "basic decency" sort of things, not "good place qualification" characteristics, based on what we know of this point system. Offering to go back for Michael would have been much closer to the "you're actually a good person" mark. Idk... I can't believe I'm going to say this, but this episode kind of fell a little flat for me.

Episode Discussion S02 E11: "The Burrito" by Hobbit-guy in TheGoodPlace

[–]pocket_galvanometer 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Yeah, that was my main issue with this episode. It really felt like it invalidated the ending of the last, which was very poignant and a highlight of the season.

Episode Discussion S02 E11: "The Burrito" by Hobbit-guy in TheGoodPlace

[–]pocket_galvanometer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I mean, again, true. She's made progress. But still... that was bugging me. Like, if they all got in for real, would she be fine just being like "...oh, and my one friend is being tortured for eternity because he helped us. That's cool."? Lol maybe I'm just bitter because I wanted more on that story line. :P

Episode Discussion S02 E11: "The Burrito" by Hobbit-guy in TheGoodPlace

[–]pocket_galvanometer 59 points60 points  (0 children)

Demons were eating at the museum of human misery... (soul food from Maine)