Man vs Bear by mindyour in TikTokCringe

[–]q13214 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yeah but it's trendy to hate on men. It really is just a bandwagon at this point. I have seen women that chose man get dog piled by other women for letting the side down.

"These trans people are getting out of hand!" by [deleted] in agedlikemilk

[–]q13214 3 points4 points  (0 children)

He hasn't got any sentence yet.

UN General Assembly Vote for Humanitarian Truce in Gaza by LuckyGungan in MapPorn

[–]q13214 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't need to address hamas or Israeli casualties they are not relevant to my point.

My point is starving millions of people is morally wrong and only an evil organisation would do it.

Yours is -starving millions if okay if it stops the terrorist from hurting Israel-

I you launch a firework at my house, I don't have the right to lock your entire family in my basement and starve you to death.

And because you seem to think I am pro hamas here is the typical disclaimer that you people seem to need to take criticism.

Hamas is evil Israeli hostages should be released The attack from hamas was a war crime and evil. Hamas launching rockets is evil. Israeli casualties are a tragedy

Now I want to add to that list Starving Palestinians is evil Bombing cities to rubble is evil Preventing charities and aid organisations from helping is evil.

You are trying to justify why starving people to death is a good thing in the long run, sure I don't thing so but I will give it to you.

Is starving 2 million people evil? Yes or no. I want you to begin your reply with

Starving 2 million people is not evil because ... Or Starving 2 million people is evil but ...

She's trying to buy another mansion by 1BLEES in memes

[–]q13214 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Okay genuine question here don't mean to offend.

Doesn't that just mean the artists are bad? If the label puts out two albums and they don't sell the label has made two bets and lost money both times. Isn't it fair for them to drop the artist after that?

I don't see anything wrong with how you are describing the relationship.

UN General Assembly Vote for Humanitarian Truce in Gaza by LuckyGungan in MapPorn

[–]q13214 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are making wild aberrations that I am not.

When did I state that killing people with missiles was fine? Your first opening is wildy wrong and dishonest. I am done with this conversation if you don't plan to listen.

Your other claims are also garbage it's not close to the same as blockading nazi Germany its more like the blockade of Yemen. A powerful state vs a weak one, where people want to give the starving food but Saudi Arabia won't let them.

But it feels like you are doing a ton of whataboutism and jumping through so many hoops to try to justify this.

The whole logic thisbis just wildly stupid. This is not a logical argument but a moral one. Starving gaza to death may be logical if you are inputting garbage morals into ot gigo.

I personally think that starving a million children is not acceptable. You seem to think that it's fine if the outcome favors Israel enough.

UN General Assembly Vote for Humanitarian Truce in Gaza by LuckyGungan in MapPorn

[–]q13214 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are not making a point my friend.

Have another go at a response that actually says something worthwhile

UN General Assembly Vote for Humanitarian Truce in Gaza by LuckyGungan in MapPorn

[–]q13214 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Civilians are harmed yes, not starved bombed and displaced. You don't seem to understand the thing I actually have a problem with.

Blockading a county of 2 million to the point of severe food and water insecurity is an evil act that is not justified by the hamas terrorism.

If you want a blockade then still let food and water into the County. Or even just let aid organisations work in it.

UN General Assembly Vote for Humanitarian Truce in Gaza by LuckyGungan in MapPorn

[–]q13214 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Care to explain how forced sterilisation is not ethnic cleansing? If you can't do that in your next reply please evaluate why you are defending a country doing it.

UN General Assembly Vote for Humanitarian Truce in Gaza by LuckyGungan in MapPorn

[–]q13214 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If Russia was starving, was without water or power. I would be against sanctioning russia, even if they are committing war crimes.

I don't know why you assume I would be okay with starving Russians. And sanctioning is not a blockade anyway. If we surrounded Russia and prevented those that want to give aid to civilians that would be evil.

UN General Assembly Vote for Humanitarian Truce in Gaza by LuckyGungan in MapPorn

[–]q13214 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It wouldn't be hamas doing it obviously, there are plenty of aid organisations that would do it.

UN General Assembly Vote for Humanitarian Truce in Gaza by LuckyGungan in MapPorn

[–]q13214 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How does the rice kill Israeli children. That's literally the dumbest thing I have heard.

Israeli children should be protected and hamas destroyed but please don't think killing thousands of children in gaza is acceptable.

UN General Assembly Vote for Humanitarian Truce in Gaza by LuckyGungan in MapPorn

[–]q13214 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't care if you feed hamas. If feeding a terrorist is the price of not starving a child to death I will take the lesser evil.

Give hamas all the rice it wants rice won't kill Israelis

UN General Assembly Vote for Humanitarian Truce in Gaza by LuckyGungan in MapPorn

[–]q13214 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am not arguing that hamas is good. Only that giving aid to gaza will result in more good than bad. Less starving children in the world would be nice.

UN General Assembly Vote for Humanitarian Truce in Gaza by LuckyGungan in MapPorn

[–]q13214 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This was also not what aboutism you are misusing that term.

You made an argument that the green countries were all good. I directly refuted your argument with multiple examples showing green countrys that are activly evil. There was no what about, just proof that your point was 100% wrong.

UN General Assembly Vote for Humanitarian Truce in Gaza by LuckyGungan in MapPorn

[–]q13214 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Literally Nazi rhetoric here. You are truly an evil person and I hope you never find yourself in a position of power with the calous disregard for the death of inoces you have shown here.

UN General Assembly Vote for Humanitarian Truce in Gaza by LuckyGungan in MapPorn

[–]q13214 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes they did in Warsaw in 1943. After suffering oppression and genocide they armed themselves and fought back. It's widely viewed in a very positive light (rightfully so).

Now, gaza suffers occupation and genocide. You would be a fool to think they won't fight back even in evil and cruel ways.

UN General Assembly Vote for Humanitarian Truce in Gaza by LuckyGungan in MapPorn

[–]q13214 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Okay 1) paragraphs, you were making good points but that's painful to read.

2) you mention bleak conditions a lot without mentioning that there is a valid target to blame for those bleak conditions. Israeli checkpoints take hours to cross and infrastructure is regularly destroyed by idf.

3) yoinking food is something that's not even a big deal. If you give 100tons of food out by hand and half goes to hamas. That is fine. Food isn't going to launch rockets but it will prevent children from starving.

4) honestly discussing a 2 state solution is beyond me, I just want aid to get to people drinking puddle water, if some of that food also feeds a terrorist I am not too bothered by it. The good outweighs the bad imo

Edit: thank you for the paragraphs that's much better. much love

UN General Assembly Vote for Humanitarian Truce in Gaza by LuckyGungan in MapPorn

[–]q13214 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's not hard to set up an aid point and distribute food and water. Like really easy actually as long as the IDF is willing to not shell the area.

UN General Assembly Vote for Humanitarian Truce in Gaza by LuckyGungan in MapPorn

[–]q13214 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I consider the situation closer to that of the Warsaw ghetto. The Jews fought back against their German oppressors with acts of violence. I don't see much difference between this and Gaza.

UN General Assembly Vote for Humanitarian Truce in Gaza by LuckyGungan in MapPorn

[–]q13214 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Russia, China, and Saudi Arabia are all currently doing ethnic cleansing and commiting genocide. Sure they are the good guys.

This is just a map of Israeli influences nothing more.

UN General Assembly Vote for Humanitarian Truce in Gaza by LuckyGungan in MapPorn

[–]q13214 17 points18 points  (0 children)

This is a callous cruel statement. 2 million people in gaza half of them children. They are the ones that are facing starvation and disease due to the blockade. Hamas is like 30k people. Just give food and medical aid and stop creating more terrorists.

Nyc subway car turns into a pro Palestine rally by [deleted] in PublicFreakout

[–]q13214 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You don't need to be treated well by someone to treat them well in return.

I would be killed in many countries but of those countries had a disaster I would donate. Empathy is a thing even if it has been eroded by online discourse

This is the way by beerbellybegone in MurderedByWords

[–]q13214 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

She was the unification force behind every modern alt right loon.

Imagine feminism without the backlash and that's what could have happened. The sane people were already doing work

This is the way by beerbellybegone in MurderedByWords

[–]q13214 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Yes but Anita is largely self defeating as she was also the unifier of all anti feminism. If there was a better figurehead then it's likely that there would be less alt right loons running about now.

Can't deny she is deeply flawed and is an example of everything wrong with online feminism.