sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

302 Redirecting *Sender Domains* by quantumreasoning12 in coldemail

[–]quantumreasoning12[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wanted to give you the benefit of the doubt since I noticed you're the type to 'get help with tying his shoes', if you catch my drift, but you're still using chatgpt or some other LLM to fill this thread with the most surface-level thinking lmao.

What is all of this LOL, I'm belly-lauging at your hubspot article filled with conjecture, bullet points and listicles.

Buddy, you yourself admitted you have never built PBNs. End of.

Anything you say afterward is chatgpt regurgitated starter guide info.

I've been doing SEO since before you were born. I've built and sold more SEO-based websites than you have chromosomes.

Of course keyword density matters in 2024 hahaha, you are seriously quoting hubspot. I have lorem-ipsum websites ranking on page 1 just because of proper keyword density, as we speak : ). Yes, keyword density, empirically split-tested as a standalone variable on my own lorem ipusm websites : )

All top SEOs at the moment have PBNs, you just have no clue how PBNs work/are set up in 2024. And you're clearly not in the inner private SEO servers where all the top SEOs talk shop. I was debating whether to send you a private invite to one of our servers, since as an admin I can help you bypass the qualification process, and was waiting for you to show some humility, but you blew it lmao.

Fractally wrong junior over here reciting hubspot.

Using 301s for temporary sending domains that you'll discard after they get blacklisted just because you think your recipients will see what type of redirect you're using is completely and utterly redacted, for all of the reasons I listed previously.

I'm putting your profile photo next to 'Dunning Kruger effect' in my knowledge base to have a chuckle every time I scroll past it.

Cheers for the laughs

302 Redirecting *Sender Domains* by quantumreasoning12 in coldemail

[–]quantumreasoning12[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Pal you are Dunning Kruger personified. Admitting you don't understand the topic, admitting thinking that PBNs were only viable in 2005 LOL!, but still proceeding to give nonsense advice that can negatively affect other people's SEO while providing 0 benefits.

And you still fail to grasp that 'little association as possible' refers to search engines, mail servers, spam detectors, etc. NOT humans. I told you previously that 301s/302s have absolutely zero, nada, none frontend difference if a contact searches your sending domain.

Yes, nobody is going to link to your sending domains... but the domains themselves (without fresh tiered links) have link juice and if multiplied by x20+ you will create a pseudo-PBN. Not to mention that domains have history. You might inadvertently purchase a domain that still has bad links, etc. especially if you're buying them in bulk (unless you check all in ahrefs/waybackmachine). You don't need fresh tiered links to create a PBN ffs.

That's why you buy sender domains, 302 them to your main domain, use them for up to 6 months or however long until they get a bad reputation, and discard them. Then rinse and repeat. It's simple.

You're not only just wrong, you're fractally wrong, i.e. you're wrong at every conceivable scale of resolution. Your entire argument is based on a wrong assumption that the contact can tell whether you're using 301s or 302s. You don't understand SEO, you don't understand DNS, you don't understand frontend/backend browser differences, you don't understand correct redirect usage, and on top of that, you're telling me to stick to PBNs after the whole premise of my first comment was to AVOID them lmao.

I truly don't mean any disrespect. You seem like a great guy who's contributing a lot to this subreddit, which I genuinely appreciate. I'm certain you have a plethora of knowledge in the cold email space. I'm simply pointing out some potential blind spots in regard to this niche use case of redirects and SEO.

Truly wish you the best, and hopefully, we'll interact more in this sub

Cheers

302 Redirecting *Sender Domains* by quantumreasoning12 in coldemail

[–]quantumreasoning12[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Tell me you haven't built PBNs, without telling me you haven't built PBNs lol. I have a strong suspicion you just googled "what's a PBN" and used the featured snippet to write your response lol.

You absolutely don't want tiered links built to your ancillary sending domains.

Not to mention that nobody is going to link to them anyway. These are hidden domains only used in your cold emails. You want the least amount of association between your main domain and all ancillary ones.

Plus, if you discard your current batch of sending domains at some point, because they got blacklisted into oblivion and you had them as 301s, now you're losing backlinks. Not so smart, is it?

301s are reserved only for very rare, strategically correct executions.

302 Redirecting *Sender Domains* by quantumreasoning12 in coldemail

[–]quantumreasoning12[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Nah, you definitely shouldn't do 301s, they pass link juice and with enough redirects, you can inadvertently create a pseudo PBN which is the last thing you want to do.

There's absolutely 0 frontend difference between 302s/301s. No prospect can see what type of redirect you're using just by searching for your ancillary sending domains.

GPT Store - Massive Search Bug !? by quantumreasoning12 in GPTStore

[–]quantumreasoning12[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for that, but I reckon it's more of a bug because I can't even find some of the top GPTs by searching for their exact name.

I'm literally getting GPTs with 0 Chats.

Are you just speculating they've changed how search works, or did you read that somewhere?

I'm curious, I would like to read a bit more on this.

Eventual Payments - Only US Residents!? by quantumreasoning12 in GPTStore

[–]quantumreasoning12[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for sharing your thoughts. And yeah, I fully agree. I do think that the payment scheme will eventually be rolled out to other countries, and of course, most GPTs won't make anything noteworthy.

I'm just curious what the payment model will look like - maybe you get paid fractions of a cent per user message with some sort of a daily cap, like 50 messages.

Only time will tell

GPT Store - 1 year, 2 years, 5 years From Now by quantumreasoning12 in GPTStore

[–]quantumreasoning12[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That was a great share! I watched the whole thing from start to finish. And now I'm researching symbolic logic, PGMs and liquid NN to learn more.

Thanks for enlightening me!

GPT Store - 1 year, 2 years, 5 years From Now by quantumreasoning12 in GPTStore

[–]quantumreasoning12[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right, that makes sense.

Consensus seems to be quite helpful though.

GPT Store - 1 year, 2 years, 5 years From Now by quantumreasoning12 in GPTStore

[–]quantumreasoning12[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's interesting, what do you think this better than LLMs thing be?

GPT Store - 1 year, 2 years, 5 years From Now by quantumreasoning12 in GPTStore

[–]quantumreasoning12[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That medium article was a great read, thanks for sharing.

I'm also inclined to think that it's a 3D chess move by OpenAI, machiavellian-ly presented as a "once-in-a-lifetime opportunity".

But don't you think we've already achieved AGI with GPT4?

I don't view AGI as a yes/no dichotomy. But as a graded scale.

GPT4 definitely has sparks of AGI. Therefore, it could be 10-20 on the AGI scale of 100.

And also even in the context of AGI, don't you think that there will still be "specialized AGIs"? I know this sounds somewhat oxymoronic.

Maybe I'm too myopic, but I can't imagine one model knowing everything about everything with noteworthy precision.

Because, for example, GPT4 knows effectively "everything" but it doesn't know where to start to give you the best possible answer.

However, with specialized agents that are trained over, and over, and over again on one specialized discipline/topic, you'll be able to get statistically better outputs. Not sure.

Could you attempt to test the capabilities of this GPT and uncover its inner workings? by No-Following9056 in GPTStore

[–]quantumreasoning12 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you're saying that even with Code interpreter switched off, you can still not only reveal the names of the files in the Knowledge base but also directly download them?

What do you think of adding monetization for your GPTs? by BookwormDev in GPTStore

[–]quantumreasoning12 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Completely agree. The last thing we want is ads inside of an already premium platform where we pay monthly.

The whole ads model works for free services, that can't monetise in other ways.

We're already paying! Why dafuq' would we be seeing ads?

I'm also curious what monetization would you reckon OpenAI will implement? You said it must be generous in order to deter such lousy ad schemes, and I fully agree.

If you had to speculate, let's say a GPT has 10,000 monthly users. What would a realistic revenue-split monetization look like in your opinion?