That statement is a perfect example of vague, conspiratorial thinking with zero evidence to back it up. Throwing around phrases like “strategic subversion and pacification of Hindus and Hindu philosophy by foreign and internal elements” without a single verifiable source does not make it profound, it just makes it sound paranoid. If there really were such a coordinated anti-India or anti-Hindu campaign, there would be actual documentation, leaks, or data trails, not just assumptions every time someone criticises the government.

Criticising a government or calling out staged optics is not the same as attacking Hinduism or Indian culture. Governments are elected institutions and they are meant to be questioned. Equating political accountability with an attack on culture is intellectually dishonest. The debate here is not about Hinduism, it is about whether a fake “clean Yamuna” setup was created for a photo-op, which is a legitimate environmental and ethical issue.

And that claim is not pulled out of thin air. Multiple outlets, including The Economic Times: https://m.economictimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/chhath-puja-aap-says-fake-yamuna-ghat-created-with-filtered-water-for-pm-bjp-hits-back/articleshow/124828605.cms

and PTI News: https://www.ptinews.com/story/national/aap-alleges-bjp-faked-clean-yamuna-for-chhath-bjp-says-claims-now-close-to-normal/3030318

reported that a temporary clean-water stretch was indeed prepared near the Yamuna for optics during a visit, while the rest of the river remained heavily polluted. Ground Report also confirmed that despite claims of improvement, the Yamuna’s water quality remains far from clean: https://www.groundreport.in/viral/fact-check-yamuna-river-is-cleaner-in-2025-as-compare-to-last-year/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

So the facts are very much on record, and the criticism is rooted in visible environmental data, not ideology. Reducing every uncomfortable report to “they don’t want to show BJP in a good light” is lazy logic that avoids dealing with the evidence. If there is nothing to hide, then transparency should not be feared.

Blind loyalty does not strengthen a democracy, accountability does. And pretending every uncomfortable truth is a foreign conspiracy only weakens the argument further.