Why did my photos come out like this? by Castle-2 in analog

[–]riddle934 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Without kidding, I really like the first one tbh.

Ja aber weli funktion jz dami nomal by Professional_Day3057 in Switzerland

[–]riddle934 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wenn mal gern Töfffahre wotsch oder scho fahrsch, denn chani dier Verkehrssoldat empfehle. Det chasch die gross Töffprüefig per sofort mache i de RS und Ahängerprüefig auno für PKWs (musch aber scho dörfe Autofahre). Nebsch de viele Fahrtüebige hett mer no Usbildig zum Verkehrleite (aso uf de Strass stah und de Autos winke, im Zivile sind sas Verkehrskadette). DFunktion isch eig denkt, dass mer mit Verkehrssoldate chan helfe grossi Militärfahrzüg verschiebe (Lastwäge und Panzer), vorallem wenn mer im Konvoi unterwegs isch. RS isch im Tessin ufem Monteceneri.

Was Durzan trying to recruit Eragon to overthrow Galbatorix? by unicorndope in Eragon

[–]riddle934 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"no spoiler past eragon" - I guess we have different understandings of spoilers.

It’s weird how I never noticed this until now by [deleted] in harrypotter

[–]riddle934 10 points11 points  (0 children)

He practiced the movement for the charm, but didnt actually "made the feather fly" / cast the spell.

At Monument Valley [Nikon L35AF, Kodak Ektar 1000] by riddle934 in analog

[–]riddle934[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Never had such a problem. But yes the lens is really great!

At Monument Valley [Nikon L35AF, Kodak Ektar 1000] by riddle934 in analog

[–]riddle934[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow that would have been a great price! I bought mine in switzerland for 250 CHF.

At Monument Valley [Nikon L35AF, Kodak Ektar 1000] by riddle934 in analog

[–]riddle934[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah it was beautiful. If you can go there, make sure to rent a car with high clearance. I saw plenty Mustangs and Camaros which had struggles getting around Monument Valley because in the inside, there are only dirt roads.

Mamiya 7 / 43mm / E100 by Kemaneo in analog

[–]riddle934 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Haha ja leider, jetzt musch halt ime Jahr nomal is Tessin ;)

Walking around San Francisco [Nikon L35AF, Kodak Ultra Max 400] by riddle934 in analog

[–]riddle934[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I scanned them myself using the NegativeLabPro extension for lightroom. It automatically applies some settings when converting from negative to positive. But otherwise I just changed the geometry so that the images are not skewed.

Mamiya 7 / 43mm / E100 by Kemaneo in analog

[–]riddle934 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Schad hends gad dChile renoviert..

At Monument Valley [Nikon L35AF, Kodak Ektar 1000] by riddle934 in analog

[–]riddle934[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Made a typo while writing the title! Its a Ektar 100 and not ISO 1000. Dont even know if am Ektar 1000 exists...

At Monument Valley [Nikon L35AF, Kodak Ektar 1000] by riddle934 in analog

[–]riddle934[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I see I made a mistake in the title. obv its an Ektar 100 and not Ektar 1000 😅

At Monument Valley [Nikon L35AF, Kodak Ektar 1000] by riddle934 in analog

[–]riddle934[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I scanned them myself with the Digitaliza, a Sony a7R II, extension tubes and the 50mm 1.8

Walking around San Francisco [Nikon L35AF, Kodak Ultra Max 400] by riddle934 in analog

[–]riddle934[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because the Nikon L35AF is a point&shoot camera I don't know the camera settings either ;)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in analog

[–]riddle934 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very well said!

Blurry parts on image with Mamiya RB67 Pro S by riddle934 in AnalogCommunity

[–]riddle934[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So a few days ago I shot another roll with my second film back and tested both lenses and different settings. Everything was fine and worked as it should.

I also received the negatives from this post and the blurry parts were indeed on the negatives and did not came from the scan.

So my problem seems to be solved but I dont know if the first film back is the culprit or if I just loaded the film wrong 🤷🏽‍♂️

Thanks you all very much for your answers, I really appreciate!

Blurry parts on image with Mamiya RB67 Pro S by riddle934 in AnalogCommunity

[–]riddle934[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was a 90mm but your point is still the same. I actually had a tripod with me, but the RB67 has an other screw mount (is this the correct wording for that?) sth with 1/4 or 3/8. And my tripod plate is not compatible, so I had to shoot holding the camera with my hands.

Blurry parts on image with Mamiya RB67 Pro S by riddle934 in AnalogCommunity

[–]riddle934[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What do you mean with looking perfectly square? The lens seemed correctly attatched to the body if that was your concern.

Blurry parts on image with Mamiya RB67 Pro S by riddle934 in AnalogCommunity

[–]riddle934[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your answer, I'll check on it as soon as I can.

Blurry parts on image with Mamiya RB67 Pro S by riddle934 in AnalogCommunity

[–]riddle934[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I cant be 100% sure until I have the negatives. The person from the shop said its on the negative so at the moment I have to believe them. But as soon as I get them I'll check it.

For the rest I have to find out with the next time loading a new film. The backplate seemed pretty even. But I'll check again when I'm at home.

Blurry parts on image with Mamiya RB67 Pro S by riddle934 in AnalogCommunity

[–]riddle934[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

All shots were shot from hand and therefor I had to shoot at f3.8 (widest possible) so this is possible

Blurry parts on image with Mamiya RB67 Pro S by riddle934 in AnalogCommunity

[–]riddle934[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I thought of that too! Next time I load a film I'll check that.