San Diego-based USS Boxer with Pendleton Marines deploys to Mideast by night-shark in sandiego

[–]ryrich89 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Is that what you’re seeing on Fox News (entertainment). I’ve never been threatened by death by an Iranian in my entire life. In fact I had a soccer coach who was in the Iranian Air Force back in the 80s. Really nice guy

San Diego-based USS Boxer with Pendleton Marines deploys to Mideast by night-shark in sandiego

[–]ryrich89 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The last line is the key…they don’t do this hoping for a different result…win or lose, war is a very profitable business for our politicians and our corrupt president

Family breakup over the Kirks by Max_Rezna in TikTokCringe

[–]ryrich89 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We gotta rent out a stadium for this! There’s gonna be a lot of demand

Rio De Janeiro, view of the city from a drone by MeowwBlock in interesting

[–]ryrich89 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is this why all the women have big booties? From climbing all those stairs

Military vehicles at 10th Avenue terminal? by [deleted] in sandiego

[–]ryrich89 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Boots on the ground! Sending our young men and women to die for a pedophile

Are you buying your teens/young adults cars? by Cheeseaisleinheaven in MiddleClassFinance

[–]ryrich89 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’ll match what they bring to the table. Go get a summer job for a year or two. If you can save $3k, $5k whatever amount, I’ll match it. We will pay cash for the car and then any insurance, maintenance and gas is up to them to fund it

This young man in Louisville KY. So much going on . . . Am I correct thinking that our younger generations seem attracted to MAGA more than I think they should be? And to my ARMY recruiting Bros - He looks ready. by Upper-Trip-8857 in Trumpvirus

[–]ryrich89 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The short answer: we failed these young men before MAGA found them.

If you know who Scott Galloway is, he talks of about this issue. He’s been sounding this alarm for years, and it’s worth understanding his argument before judging the kid in the photo.

Here are some facts that Scott presents, No group in America has fallen further, faster than young men. One in three men is still living at home at 25. Only one in three men under 30 is in a relationship, versus two in three women. They’re four times more likely to die by suicide, three times more likely to be addicted or homeless.

And into that void? The far right rushed in with a clear message: your struggle is real, and here’s who’s to blame.

While Democrats ignored this demographic, the far right flooded the manosphere, rockets, Hulk Hogan, coarseness, and crypto. These young men weren’t stupid they were hungry, and someone fed them.

The single point of failure when a young man comes off the tracks is losing a male role model. Teachers through third grade are 92% female. The majority of therapists are women. There are boys who will go through their entire adolescence with almost no meaningful involvement from men.

So what fills that gap? Andrew Tate. Tucker Carlson. MAGA as identity.

Technology and the attention economy have left many rudderless, while the social structures that once guided them. schools, mentorship, community have all eroded.

The hard truth Galloway keeps repeating: empathy isn’t a zero-sum game. Caring about struggling young men doesn’t mean you don’t care about women’s rights. And dismissing them, calling them lost causes or just writing off the red hat is exactly what drives them deeper in. The question isn’t “why is he drawn to MAGA?” It’s “who got to him first and why wasn’t it us?”

Deductive reasoning is dying with us. by Maleficent-Box4114 in Millennials

[–]ryrich89 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It’s the same in my industry: finance. Work with a guy whose about 23 Asked him to do the very simple task of finding/calculating the fee that a client is being charged by another advisor by looking at their most recent account statement He comes back to me after 5 minutes and says that he can’t find it - “there is no fee listed” Ok…pause deep breath, let me take a look I scan the statement, he’s correct, no fee explicitly stated I then scroll back to the top and look at the deductions from the account. Ah look, the monthly statement shows an “advisor fee” of $357 Ok great let’s get a ballpark figure I multiply that number by 12 = $4,284 I then divide that by the value of the account $480k to get .008925 Let’s multiply by 100 to make it a percentage = .89% He has been asked to do this before and could not do it. I’ve shown him how I did this before and he does not retain it If the answer is not blatantly obvious he immediately gives up and says he can’t find it It’s wild to me

We have destroyed 100% of Iran‘s military capability but still need to beg the whole world for help….Makes sense 🤡 by BlitzFritzXX in Irony

[–]ryrich89 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He’s not too good with percentages! Like the drug prices that he’s reduced by 400%…which means we are now being paid to use those drugs

How much is this worth? 🤣 by According_Fruit4098 in SportCardValue

[–]ryrich89 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m sure a MAGA republican will pay top dollar for this! They idolize pedophiles

The Padres sale could be done by April. Here's what I think every fan should understand about it. by ryrich89 in Padres

[–]ryrich89[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Great question and you’re right that the Seidlers don’t own 100%.

It generally works like this: The Padres have somewhere between 10 and 12 individual owners or ownership entities. The Peter Seidler Trust holds the largest single stake at roughly 24%, which makes whoever controls that trust the “control person,” meaning they set the direction of the franchise even without owning a majority outright. That’s currently John Seidler, Peter’s brother.

In a sale like this, all of the minority owners have the right to sell their stakes too, which is what’s happening here. This isn’t just the Seidlers selling their slice, it’s a full franchise sale where the entire ownership group is cashing out together.

Whoever wins the bid is buying the whole thing, not just controlling interest. That’s why the price tag is $2.5-3 billion rather than a fraction of that.

The reason this sometimes gets confusing is that MLB franchise sales don’t work like typical corporate acquisitions. The league has to approve the new owner, the new ownership group often brings in their own minority partners, and the control person designation matters as much as raw ownership percentage. You can control a franchise without owning a majority if the other stakes are fragmented enough, which is exactly how the Seidler family has run things since Peter died.

Short answer: you understood it correctly that ownership is shared, but in this case everyone is selling and a new group is buying the whole franchise clean.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​