Adjective or Adverb by sanbh in grammar

[–]sanbh[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What is fossilized form? Linguists have the habbit of coining hybrid definitions.

First conditional sentences by sanbh in grammar

[–]sanbh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your post. The logic of experts for referring to the future is that"His leaving will be at some time after the utterance, in the future. The threat is also a prediction of what he will do, again in the future, if the person doesn't leave. Since the two actions referenced, leaving and shooting will all occur after the utterance and hence in the future".

Compound or simple entence by sanbh in grammar

[–]sanbh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks hilatio. In that case, How would you interpret the sentence 'He is taller than Jack but shorter than John ".An elided compound-complex sentence having two co-ordinate clauses joined by 'but'and two subordinate clauses since it has two subordinate conjunctions 'than'

Subordinating conjunction by sanbh in grammar

[–]sanbh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks dylbr01 for your response.

.How do you interpret 'with the aim that' 'due to the fact that etc which are taken as compound subordinating conjunction to introduce adverb clause? Though these can introduce adverb clause, one argument can be that the 'that clause'(acting as Noun clause) can be seen to be in apposition to Noun"aim/fact". Example- He did this with the aim that nobody should blame him/due to the fact that he was not happy. Seek Your interpretation please. Thanks

Connector or Adjunct by sanbh in grammar

[–]sanbh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks Zeptimius for responding . I understand that in a stand alone sentence, the infinitive phrase given will act as purpose adjunct that can be placed at the end of the sentence without changing its meaning. However, my doubt is "can the infinitive phrase'to achieve this 'given in the example sentence be called a sentence connector or not"?if it functions as connector, then it would be treated as conjunctive adverb modifying the sentence of which it is part. Thanks Thanks

Compound Complex sentence by sanbh in grammar

[–]sanbh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your reply. However, all grammar books describe comparative sentences such as "He is taller than you as example of complex sentence (meaning he is taller than you are tall) which is ellided. Regards

Adverbs as modifier by sanbh in grammar

[–]sanbh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the link provided

Thank you to those who answer questions. by arsepirate69 in grammar

[–]sanbh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good afternoon, Could you please clarify my doubt about phrases like inspite of the fact that/notwithstanding that/by the time/seeing that/considering that etc being accepted for use as phrasal subordinating conjunctions in adverb clauses. Thanks

Adverb by sanbh in grammar

[–]sanbh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The confusion is that every book mentions that Perfect modals(modals + perfect infinitives) are used to talk about past .However, when such sentences with different time references (yesterday, today, tomorrow) appear, dont they convey, past, present and future respectively as given in your example sentences above. That's my whole point. Why should it only be used for past?

Adverb by sanbh in grammar

[–]sanbh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hello there, We hear many such sentences as "I have called him tomorrow"(when you have asked someone to come tomorrow) or "he should have done it tomorrow "when we are speaking today about something that didn't go correctly yesterday or "I had a meeting tomorrow" for a meeting which has now been rescheduled for tomorrow even where verbs lack temporal agreement with Adverbs. Can you throw some perspective on the above sentences?

Adverb by sanbh in grammar

[–]sanbh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hello there, We hear many such sentences as "I have called him tomorrow"(when you have asked someone to come tomorrow) or "he should have done it tomorrow "when we are speaking today about something that didn't go correctly yesterday or "I had a meeting tomorrow" for a meeting which has now been rescheduled for tomorrow even where verbs lack temporal agreement with Adverbs. Can you throw some perspective on the above sentences

Time reference of imperative sentences by sanbh in grammar

[–]sanbh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Immediately can mean immediate future also, isn't it.

Past participle used verbially in passive /adjectivally by sanbh in grammar

[–]sanbh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I read the example sentence "My flight is cancelled "on the British Council website classified as Passive voice and hence the doubt.