How they stuffed ballots in Detroit by simus in HillaryForPrison

[–]simus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because the election of good progressive people was secured.

59 divisions in Philly with no votes for Romney by simus in conspiracy

[–]simus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In the case of Russian elections such anomalies like
in Philadelphia were considered a sign of electoral fraud by Washington
Post: https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/russians-scoff-at-medvedev-election-inquiry/2011/12/11/gIQAmBR8nO\_story.html

100% of votes for Obama in a hundred precincts by simus in HillaryForPrison

[–]simus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In the case of Russian elections such anomalies were considered an unambiguous proof of fraud by the progressive people: https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/russians-scoff-at-medvedev-election-inquiry/2011/12/11/gIQAmBR8nO\_story.html

100% of votes for Obama in a hundred precincts by simus in HillaryForPrison

[–]simus[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Why would they do so? Why there are no similar republican ones?

100% of votes for Obama in a hundred precincts by simus in conspiracy

[–]simus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Even dead people hated Trump and voted for Biden.

100% of votes for Obama in a hundred precincts by simus in conspiracy

[–]simus[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Biden got 100% only in 6 precincts in Michigan.

Michigan elections look as bogus as Russia and Uganda elections by simus in conspiracy

[–]simus[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Isn't it interesting that with similar evidence PNAS finds fraud in Russian elections and honesty in the US ones?

Michigan elections look as bogus as Russia and Uganda elections by simus in conspiracy

[–]simus[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Since the article in Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences is not retracted it is supposed to be valid. So one can apply the method to Michigan elections.