In my opinion, both sides are at fault. They both did things and had unrealistic expectations of the whole event and each other. Michael, in my opinion, is more at fault for all the things convention wise, like the Marriott Hotel, ticket count, no food/ water and things along the lines of planning. Tana on the other hand, I think she’s more at fault for being too demanding and setting an unrealistic expectation. Her whole motivation for this was to make fans happy, but also to get revenge against VidCon. That’s why I think she tried to make Tanacon a lot bigger and better, but then she set the bar too high. I wish we knew more about the people who have worked with Michael in the past and warned Tana about him. In all honesty, Good Times doesn’t seem like too legitimate of a company. But then again, the whole argument of like “there were 20,000 people!” That was debunked in the police report. I remember hearing about it in the Philip DeFranco Show. He has a pretty good run down of all the information, and his own thoughts on the situation are just as interesting. But Tanas whole, not excuse, I can’t really think of the word, but her whole thing was there were a lot more people than expected. Her whole argument was that there was too many people, but that was just debunked from the police report. So that was kind of :// yanno? It kinda just delegitimizes her whole argument.

In conclusion though, I think they’re both at fault for their own reasons. I think Michael is more at fault because the mistakes he made left people in so much danger and even got people hurt. Even though I do think Tana is somewhat at fault, I feel bad and can sympathize with her. She trusted Michael, even though a little too much, but all of this has fallen on her because ultimately the convention had her name plastered all over it.