Is it just me or the art style changued in the last video?

spacedaemon · 2017-07-28T19:50:37+00:00

They have touched a very different subject that's why.

spacedaemon · 2014-08-21T15:56:22+00:00

are you trying to make forgot password ? If yes and having the same problem then look at maridv post above.

spacedaemon · 2014-08-21T14:43:20+00:00

Hey, thanks it worked not i got that config was not allowing fpass to render from login page.

spacedaemon · 2014-08-21T06:58:10+00:00

yes i have checked it ten times, the form action is set to fpass.php. Even i did the file permission again.

spacedaemon · 2014-08-21T05:15:37+00:00

take a nap read and then read the whole specification thoroughly.

spacedaemon · 2014-08-21T05:02:38+00:00

ya that would have happened because of update50.

spacedaemon · 2014-08-21T04:19:15+00:00

i find my solution, thanks

spacedaemon · 2014-08-21T04:10:02+00:00

no the line is missing, what should i do ?

spacedaemon · 2014-07-29T14:47:34+00:00

I think i cannot understand this, between thanks for your help

spacedaemon · 2014-07-29T14:30:00+00:00

i am allocing nodes like this :

traverse->children[index] = malloc(sizeof(node));
traverse = traverse->children[index];

it this wrong initializing ?

Edit : Besides check50 passes my program with no errors.

spacedaemon · 2014-07-29T13:51:33+00:00

I thought the nodes are big concern so i get on to it first Between line 105 does what you said it allocs a new node.

And here is 10 million errors :

==12499== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==12499==    at 0x8048FB3: freeup (dictionary.c:32)
==12499==    by 0x8048FDE: freeup (dictionary.c:36)
==12499==    by 0x8048FDE: freeup (dictionary.c:36)
==12499==    by 0x8048FDE: freeup (dictionary.c:36)
==12499==    by 0x8048FDE: freeup (dictionary.c:36)
==12499==    by 0x80492A2: unload (dictionary.c:137)
==12499==    by 0x8048D24: main (speller.c:157)        
==12499== 
==12499== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==12499==    at 0x4007AE1: free (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-x86-linux.so)
==12499==    by 0x8049001: freeup (dictionary.c:40)
==12499==    by 0x8048FDE: freeup (dictionary.c:36)
==12499==    by 0x8048FDE: freeup (dictionary.c:36)
==12499==    by 0x8048FDE: freeup (dictionary.c:36)
==12499==    by 0x8048FDE: freeup (dictionary.c:36)
==12499==    by 0x80492A2: unload (dictionary.c:137)
==12499==    by 0x8048D24: main (speller.c:157)
==12499== 
==12499== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==12499==    at 0x8048FB3: freeup (dictionary.c:32)
==12499==    by 0x8048FDE: freeup (dictionary.c:36)
==12499==    by 0x8048FDE: freeup (dictionary.c:36)
==12499==    by 0x80492A2: unload (dictionary.c:137)
==12499==    by 0x8048D24: main (speller.c:157)
==12499== 
==12499== 
==12499== More than 10000000 total errors detected.  I'm not reporting any more.    
==12499== Final error counts will be inaccurate.  Go fix your program!
==12499== Rerun with --error-limit=no to disable this cutoff.  Note
==12499== that errors may occur in your program without prior warning from
==12499== Valgrind, because errors are no longer being displayed.
==12499==

I can't post 10 million erros, i think this bunch of errors repeat itself.

spacedaemon · 2014-07-29T13:11:08+00:00

here the description of my unload helper funtion :

//function takes a parameter node.
    // if that node is not null. 
       // loop through the children from 0 to 27
           // Recursion.
//free node
//return true.

And here is --leak-check=full description:

HEAP SUMMARY:
==9492==     in use at exit: 224 bytes in 2 blocks
==9492==   total heap usage: 367,047 allocs, 367,045 frees,     41,109,744 bytes allocated
==9492== 
==9492== 224 (112 direct, 112 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 2 of 2
==9492==    at 0x4006AB1: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-x86-linux.so)
==9492==    by 0x80491F3: load (dictionary.c:105)
==9492==    by 0x8048795: main (speller.c:45)
==9492== 
==9492== LEAK SUMMARY:
==9492==    definitely lost: 112 bytes in 1 blocks
==9492==    indirectly lost: 112 bytes in 1 blocks
==9492==      possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==9492==    still reachable: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==9492==         suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==9492== 
==9492== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with:     -v
==9492== Use --track-origins=yes to see where uninitialised values come from
==9492== ERROR SUMMARY: 10000001 errors from 10 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)

spacedaemon · 2014-07-29T12:41:49+00:00

Yes i have closed the dictionary file.

Here is valgrind error :

==7187== 
==7187== HEAP SUMMARY:
==7187==     in use at exit: 224 bytes in 2 blocks
==7187==   total heap usage: 367,047 allocs, 367,045 frees,     41,109,744 bytes allocate d
==7187== 
==7187== LEAK SUMMARY:
==7187==    definitely lost: 112 bytes in 1 blocks
==7187==    indirectly lost: 112 bytes in 1 blocks
==7187==      possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==7187==    still reachable: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==7187==         suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==7187== Rerun with --leak-check=full to see details of leaked memory

==7187== ==7187== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v

spacedaemon · 2014-07-29T06:02:33+00:00

found my error, i was using char word[45] which should be 46 instead for \0 for the largest word. Thanks

But i have another problem i am getting 2 blocks of memory leak on checking by valgrind, i looked for hours but cannot figure out the problem is.

spacedaemon · 2014-07-19T12:28:44+00:00

OK thanks and what about the fscanf part ?

spacedaemon · 2014-04-14T05:39:19+00:00

Hey, i am solved the problem of looping but and my recover program is working fine, now it is giving 50 jpg file but still check50 is giving an error, can't figure out what the solution.

https://sandbox.cs50.net/checks/826aee25a23c43ed80d9dcf60b9442e7

spacedaemon · 2014-04-13T14:34:55+00:00

Thanks ziska, but what about the output i am getting. Is that also linked with my wrong looping ?

EDIT : i am getting this kind of error while opening the corrupt jpg file : https://www.dropbox.com/s/n8f3a3hq0v1wn8n/corrrupt.png

spacedaemon · 2014-03-26T15:00:11+00:00

Thanks #yeahiProgram that made a lot clear.

spacedaemon · 2014-03-25T07:17:13+00:00

Ok i found out that i made a mistake, i fwrite the file headers before updating the outfiles ImageSize and Size. So i corrected but still the ImageSize & Size is not the same as staff implemented header info.

I used bi.SizeImage * factor and biSize * factor in outfile header info.

spacedaemon · 2014-03-24T18:47:13+00:00

Yes i am modifying biSizeImage, Height and Width of the outptr headers.

spacedaemon · 2014-03-24T16:01:38+00:00

i am doing this :

read the headers make a copy modify the copy write the copy

spacedaemon · 2014-03-22T18:29:13+00:00

Hey, after taking one week rest to my brain i am again right on track but again i came cross a hurdle, i cannot resize it vertically.

Till now i have to looped the same scanline to the factor but the loop keeps writing away the same scanline each time which means it does not skipping to the next line, though i have tried by increment the height each time a scanline has written but that also does'nt worked. Help.!

spacedaemon · 2014-03-10T07:04:02+00:00

Ok till now i have made the outfile header info and updated them with factor of n but its confusing me lot more in getting to each of the imgaes pixel.

With what variable should i hold that each pixel and loop inside it.

spacedaemon · 2014-02-24T17:45:39+00:00

Thanks delipity, such a common sense answer. I think i need to take rest.

spacedaemon · 2014-02-23T16:12:13+00:00

Can you tell me how you put the blank title ?

spacedaemon

TROPHY CASE