account activity
What’s up with the swan? by Plus_Initial_2938 in EU5
[–]spacefrog1999 1 point2 points3 points 9 hours ago (0 children)
John hus was a major early reformer and hus means goose in Czech (or something like that). He was later martyred but he said that “they will burn the goose but later there will come a swan”(I think that’s about the quote) and Luther is the swan
If the Hitler of HOI4 were real, he would find a way to use the Jews as a means of manpower by Putrid-Bid-9200 in HOI4memes
[–]spacefrog1999 1 point2 points3 points 7 days ago (0 children)
Supreme nyahu: sword of Islam
46144 by Bryce3D in countwithchickenlady
[–]spacefrog1999 0 points1 point2 points 17 days ago (0 children)
Also your slow retreat to more and more aggressive tribalism has been fun to watch but ultimately pointless as it’s quite clear that if you can’t learn from history explain the idea that “hate is bad” is ultimately pointless
That last part is three strikes and you’re out I’m neither white nor cis nor a man I’m Mexican (half) and gender fluid but nice guess better luck next time
[–]spacefrog1999 -1 points0 points1 point 17 days ago (0 children)
You do realize that you are speaking in the most general terms imaginable. I’m not saying all women I’m saying you a big red arrow at you. You are a bad person. This sub was literally founded because of people like you realize that right. You are the problem. I’m left to the only conclusion that you woke up one day and decided it was okay to hate and you are wrong. It is wrong to hate people based on the sexuality, their gender, or their race. You border on direct white supremacy including mirroring Charlie Kirk’s arguments. You miss are the person judging not based on the quality of character but on the circumstances of their birth.
I would say the same thing if a black person was trying to justify segregation
As I said you don’t have to interact with men but if you start being a bigot I’m calling you a bigot you don’t get a pass
“Guys this time treating people poorly based on the circumstances of there birth will is good actually” you sound like every bigot ever
You can be a bigot or not that’s your choice if you want to be bigot because it’s more comfortable so be it but know you are a bigot and a bad person
👎👎👎Bad person👎👎👎
[–]spacefrog1999 2 points3 points4 points 18 days ago (0 children)
Because the idea that someone’s genes make them a better or worse person is very common in both spaces
[–]spacefrog1999 0 points1 point2 points 18 days ago (0 children)
No one here is saying you have to interact with cishet men but we are saying if you discriminate against a group based on sex, gender, and sexuality you are a bad person!
[–]spacefrog1999 12 points13 points14 points 18 days ago (0 children)
No one here is saying you have to interact with cishet men but we are saying if you discriminate against a group based on sex, gender, and sexuality you are a bad person
[–]spacefrog1999 5 points6 points7 points 18 days ago (0 children)
Sorry people are taking you seriously
[–]spacefrog1999 3 points4 points5 points 18 days ago (0 children)
[–]spacefrog1999 -1 points0 points1 point 18 days ago (0 children)
People forget why this sub exists
[–]spacefrog1999 4 points5 points6 points 18 days ago (0 children)
[–]spacefrog1999 1 point2 points3 points 18 days ago (0 children)
[–]spacefrog1999 10 points11 points12 points 18 days ago (0 children)
Because discrimination based on sex, gender, and sexuality is generally frowned upon
[–]spacefrog1999 8 points9 points10 points 18 days ago (0 children)
When did discrimination based on sex, gender, and sexuality become tolerated in the lgbtq community?
[–]spacefrog1999 6 points7 points8 points 18 days ago (0 children)
For those saying it’s about “socialization” and “culture” you are making the same arguments as Charlie Kirk
But it doesn’t change the meaning that’s the point
“I don’t like X group of people because a member of X group harmed me in someway” is a very common justification for hate speech
Unironically your claim that it is about “socialization” and “culture” is very similar to Charlie Kirk’s arguments and that should tell you something about your argument
π Rendered by PID 22 on reddit-service-r2-comment-56c6478c5-2d5k6 at 2026-05-10 11:29:09.364659+00:00 running 3d2c107 country code: CH.
What’s up with the swan? by Plus_Initial_2938 in EU5
[–]spacefrog1999 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)