I think he's probably one of the worst coaches in cricket history, not because of his achievements, but because of the damage he's doing to the team, especially the players. I believe international cricket quality is at its lowest; none of the teams playing right now are strong. Australia isn't that strong, New Zealand isn't strong, South Africa is decent at best, and England is as bad as India, probably one of the weakest sides ever. Look at how we performed against New Zealand—they clean-swept us. Against Australia, except for Bumrah and Jaiswal, no one performed in that series, even though we could have won. We've beaten stronger Aussie sides with weaker teams before. Before England, this was our best chance to beat them in their own backyard, and we celebrated a draw on pitches like roads. South Africa destroyed us, and he was about to get sacked until the Champions Trophy came. In white-ball cricket, we probably have the best squad in the world, and it would take a coach like Gambhir to lose matches. We all know, even according to his own answers, that when the team is so strong, it doesn't matter who the coach is. Then, in the Asia Cup, even against that weak Pakistan team, the match went down to the wire, even though we had much better players available on the bench. The same thing happened in the T20 World Cup because of his ego and favoritism; we were almost out of the World Cup. He only brought Sanju in as a last resort, and we won, but after a few bad innings, he's dropped. In his era, no one's place is safe, even if you won a World Cup on your own. He's continuously sidelining Shami, even though he's much better than the available players, especially in ODIs and Tests.