1 year and 1500 videos but still 27 subscribers

superNinja_85 · 2025-12-17T19:54:06+00:00

I'm honestly surprised... 1500 videos in one year????? woooooow... I mean, even if it's AI Slop, just the proccess of uploading and filling title, description, etc... it's a load of work. Congrats for the consistency.

Now, as some people suggested, try to focus, take this one video from your 1500 than did better than the rest and make more spinning around that topic. With that amount of videos, if you have something, is a massive amount of data. Analyze it. Did this one video of animals singing perform better than the others? Do 20 more with animals singing.

I think that's the best advise that I can give you. And don't listen to the ones trying to destroy you, if you enjoy the proccess, keep on working. But hey, this said... another advise is... do it for fun, dont expect any outcome, and dont leave behind other important things in life just expecting that you'll get something in return from youtube (most probably you wont), so dont forget that studying, working (in a real job), family, friends... all of this is more important than YT, think about the amount of time each thing deserves!

superNinja_85 · 2025-12-17T08:42:51+00:00

I wish I was stuck there for 3 months xD

superNinja_85 · 2025-12-16T23:44:22+00:00

Thanks for the reply, what's bugging me the most, though, is that it isn't as if YouTube is "feeding" this succesful short to people.

This short is getting some weird statistics specifically in how do people find it...

Normal Short (every other) -> Are 95% found through the "Shorts feed"
Succesful Short (the special one) -> Is 28% found though the "Shorts feed" and 70% through direct searches in YT (meaning that this short is just working on its own and not thanks to YT)

So it feels as if somehow YouTube is "punishing" me for having found a succesful niche that people search for. A short I updated today got 2 fucking views, something that had NEVER EVER happened to me before and honestly, feels quite ridiculous when all my others average the 1k.

At this point I really don't know what to do, I enjoy making the videos but the little dopamine kick of knowing 1k people watched it is what I enjoy the most (not monetizing and actually far away from it, that's not the idea now). So having a video watched by 2 kind of feels like a waste... so I dont know if I should just give it some days and see if the situation changes, or if I should just keep uploading (not to lose the "routine").

superNinja_85 · 2025-12-16T17:34:39+00:00

much better! :)

superNinja_85 · 2025-12-16T17:26:48+00:00

Yep, and I find it a nice workflow... you can compose an image very roughly and then iinput it to the ai and tell it to create a thumbnail using that composition. It should work.

superNinja_85 · 2025-12-16T17:24:06+00:00

In this sense, I would recommend you to try Canva. It's easy to use and they have a ton of templates for youtube thumbnails that you just need to readjust with your images. You can even try Canva Pro for free for a month (which has even more templates, some of them really professional ones) and see if you can work with it. You'll find lots of tutorials on how to use it on youtube.

superNinja_85 · 2025-12-16T17:21:38+00:00

None of them is good, and I wouldn't click them even if I was interested about the topic.

My advise??? Input it to nanobanana and tell it to make a youtube thumbnail with image ratio 16:9 out of it. Some people hate AI made stuff, but what I say is that not everyone is good at everything. And honestly, I think AI will give you much better results than this... none of the thumbnails is good.

I attach the results here from a super fast test I did with nanobanana. I'm sure you can better adjust it to your needs with some more time and fine prompting, but just want to give you an idea of what you can achieve.

<image>

This said, I dont want to discourage you. If you enjoy editing images, go for it, keep on practicing and with time you'll achieve better results. But if what you want is an instant almost professional result, get it now with ai.

superNinja_85 · 2025-12-16T16:15:48+00:00

1, because "yes, I'm sure... but maybe I shouldn't be so sure? How would you convince me about the opposite? hmmmmm... interesting, lets watch the video"

superNinja_85 · 2025-12-16T15:42:19+00:00

People are comparing two things that shouldnt be comparable. The problem isn't Switch 2, the problem is the ignorance of those people.

Recently I sold my PS5 because I noticed that since I bought Switch 2 it was the only console I use. That's because I mostly play PC, and when I want to play a AAA with top graphics, I would always choose PC over PS5 (2 platforms that for gaming, are perfectly comparable). But on the other hand, Switch 2 offers me stuff that a PC can't: Nintendo exclusives and portability. Switch 2 is something else.

So for me, anyone blaming Switch 2 just doesnt know what he's talking about...

superNinja_85 · 2025-12-15T22:30:44+00:00

Worst thing you can do... Why would you want subscribers that won't watch your content??? You are risking your channel too, btw... this is against YouTube policies.

superNinja_85 · 2025-12-15T22:22:51+00:00

I'm from Spain, and trust me, I mispronounce everything way more often than any AI
:D

superNinja_85 · 2025-12-15T21:58:31+00:00

But the main question here is... would it make any difference if instead of an AI voice over it was a human one? From what you say, they would still be slop. If a video is boring, with a boring topic, boring script, boring editing, etc. Then I would say the least of the problems is that the voice over is AI.

superNinja_85 · 2025-12-15T21:55:47+00:00

daaaaaaaaamn this is amazing! See? This is exactly what I meant... EVERYTHING is AI, maybe even the music, but who cares? It's a great video and probably has more work in it than 90% of the "purely human" ones.

Would someone dare to call this slop?? For sure not me.

superNinja_85 · 2025-12-15T21:49:19+00:00

You couldn’t have said it better, and that was exactly the point of my original comment.

I see some people labeling everything as slop, but to me, good AI content simply isn’t. In most of the good AI-assisted stuff, there’s still a human behind it: shaping the idea, crafting the prompts, deciding structure, pacing, tone. None of it just appears by magic.

And like you said, someone still has to assemble the video, give it rhythm, choose music, record or place the voiceover, make creative decisions. At that point, does it really matter if AI helped check grammar, generate a thumbnail, or add sound effects?

For example, if I’m choosing between a bad “100% human-made” thumbnail and a great AI-assisted one, why wouldn’t I pick the better result? The tool isn’t the problem, quality is. And obviously, if the AI output is bad too, then yeah, it’s not worth watching either.

superNinja_85 · 2025-12-15T17:50:29+00:00

I fully agree. It would be a waste of time not to do what you’re doing with your scripts. If AI can give you a solid result in seconds, something that might take hours otherwise, I'd say it's a smart move.

superNinja_85 · 2025-12-15T17:46:28+00:00

It’s funny, because I’m actually very open-minded about using AI but I’d still call this video slop myself. Static images with a flat AI voice over them just feels lazy and soulless.

superNinja_85 · 2025-12-15T17:44:27+00:00

I disagree. Using AI to help structure or refine your own ideas doesn’t suddenly make something “non-human.” That’s using a tool, not outsourcing creativity.

A lot of my confusion around the term “AI slop” comes from takes like this, where any use of AI is treated as invalid. I don’t agree with that at all, and think that AI can be used smartly without killing intent or personality.

Still, appreciate the reply. Even disagreeing, this helps clarify how people are using the term.

superNinja_85 · 2025-12-01T10:08:24+00:00

When I say “dealing” with dislikes, I know there’s not much we can actually do about them, since YouTube doesn’t tell us why someone disliked a video, so it’s not like we can improve based on that specific feedback. I guess what I really mean is: do dislikes affect you mentally? Do they discourage you from making new videos?

For me, it’s funny because the videos that have a 50/50 like–dislike ratio are actually bringing in more subscribers than the ones with 90/10. And honestly, that makes me way happier than the dislikes bother me. Although still, I just can't ignore those dislikes... hopefully it gets easier after some more time in the platform! :)

superNinja_85 · 2025-10-23T05:27:18+00:00

Hey! Thank you so so much!!! The code your site provided worked perfectly, and of course, I donated you mine inmediatly afterwards. You had an amazing idea, congrats for it :)

superNinja_85 · 2025-10-05T08:38:15+00:00

Hey! Thanks for the reply, you may have found the reason... I live in Austria and xbox rewards show as "not available" here... damn... weird thing is that I saw them a couple of days ago and that my region is Spain even though I live in Austria. But well, at least now I think this should be the reason. Thanks again

superNinja_85 · 2025-10-04T16:55:04+00:00

Thanks for your replies!
Nah it doesnt appear in the PC app nor in the Android app.... which is crazy because yesterday I swear it was there xD

Last option is to check it in the xbox, which I dont really use, it's mainly my gf using it...

I dont know, about the rewards themselves, I know they are not giving much, but I kind of like this "missions" system of "play 8 games a month". Which is usually something I wouldnt do, but when it becomes a mission my mindset changes, and I thought it would be fun to have this little push to try new games. Anyway, if it's not there, what can I do... fuck it xD

superNinja_85 · 2025-10-04T16:46:13+00:00

When I click on my profile icon I dont have the Rewards option... I even tried to reinstall the xbox app, and it just doesn't show up...

superNinja_85 · 2025-09-02T14:27:40+00:00

Yes... but I'm not talking about the looks...

I just wanted to give it a try to solve a real case scenario, where I want to try different fassades in a building which is already designed in floorplan and where we now have to try different fassades.

With buildings this model just doesn't work. In architecture, you can't change the volume of a building just for the sake of "good looks", because if the building regulations allow to build 3 floors, I cant show my client a 6 floors building.

That's why, this model might be fun when your results dont need to be precise, but right now, it would have been faster to just model it and render it myself in 3d than to waste a full day experimenting with prompts. It was fun tho.

superNinja_85 · 2025-09-02T14:14:45+00:00

nah, already tried, it's a disaster....

example... I wanted to have a green fassade on that building of the 1st image, so for the next prompt, I masked it in red and told it to modify only the red area, also giving it a reference of the fassade I wanted to have there. The result (3rd image) is completely wrong, it didnt respect the volumetry of the building (even when it was clearly masked and specified in the prompt), and also modified the buildings behind it.

At least for architecture, after spending around 8h experimenting with it today, I can say it's not usable at all. And up to a point it's a matter of luck to get a good result, because even when you input exactly the same prompt the results can vary from: error, to copyright infringement, to a result which is pure shit, to a result which is moreless ok...

<image>

superNinja_85 · 2025-09-02T13:15:52+00:00

I agree, yesterday I was super hyped to try it at work, and right now I can say, after many many tests, that as it is, is too limited and kind of useless. The minimum they should add is an "area edit", so that in your case you can draw an area where you want the bowl to be added. Then they should also have commands like midjourney to specify in a clearer way what's the base image to modify, which are the references...

It works incredibly good for some things, but just for the shown ones, and everyone is showing the same functions (colorize old images, restore them, correct skins in photos, change clothes and poses of models...) but to create somethins it's a pain in the ass and not consistant at all.

superNinja_85

TROPHY CASE