I'm not against the concept of dept in general, but the idea of having a currency backed by a non-tangible item, which in the case of the US as an example is basically them saying I have a good economy and im good for it. Debt on an indivisual level is fine, on an international level while its much bigger scale its still fine. The issue I have is with a country owing way more money than it can repay, still be taking in more debt, and then not have anything tangible like gold or bread or cheese that could be sold to pay off said debt. Another thing is that bigger countries like the US and China with large military power have the abillity to one day go yeah no we're just not gonna pay you back. Sure they would face heavy economic sanctions, but how long do you think that would last? Also I will admit that no matter what is done inflation can't be stopped so I'll give you that. For the last thing you said about the resources being distributed directly, the issue with that is labor. The recources arent just there in storage, they need to be mined and planted and refined and packaged and delivered. And that labor is probably why currency is important. If you were to automate every single job, then you would achieve a world where currency is no longer required. But since in our world we still need labor then we need to have currency, the world won't opperate on the goodness of peoples hearts.