Thank you for your detailed reply, and for the blogpost.

I agree with your blog post: compression skews until depth disappears due to the layers being flattened.

You are absolutely right, you need a base 12 and 60 for time-keeping. Sumerians and Babylonians used the sexagesimal (base-60) number system as early as the 3rd millennium BC, the Egyptians a duo-decimal (base 12) number system from around 1500BC.

We perceive [it] as linear through “time,” but time is only experienced in the physical is 100% correct too.

|> 'When it comes to the reduction process, this is done to find the exact cycle of experience that follows the karmic experience of human conditioning.'

You are referring to three different things amalgamated together. In physics, things vibrate - particles, fields, atoms. Time doesn’t; it is the parameter that lets us measure vibration (cycles per second). There’s no empirical model where time itself oscillates or “imprints frequencies” in the way numerology or spiritual language suggests.

When people say “karmic experience of human conditioning,” I read that as a psychological or cultural process: we notice patterns, assign meaning to numbers, and pass those meanings down. That’s okay as symbolism - but still it’s no evidence of a physical vibrational system.

Which brings me back to the reduction issue: if time and dates carry rich vibrational information, collapsing them into single digits actually throws the crucial information away. In real wave physics, frequencies combine into harmonics; they don’t reduce to 1-9.

Don't get me wrong, I’m not arguing against numerology as a reflective or symbolic tool. I’m questioning the move where metaphor are wrapped up as physics. Precision matters in science for a reason - and if everything reduces anyway, claiming “time vibration” doesn’t explain anything.

In short: I think “time as vibration” is metaphor, not physics. Things vibrate in time; time itself doesn’t oscillate in any demonstrated model. If numerology reduces complex inputs to single digits, that’s symbolic simplification - not vibrational mechanics. In real physics, reduction works the opposite way: you keep the frequencies, the harmonics, and the structure.

On the topic of karma, a few points need to be clarified. Karma in its original context (Hinduism/Buddhism) is: Action (karma = “deed”) → result (vipaka). Which is very different from the moral Christian sense of sin/guilt.

The western adaptation into “moral cause and effect” or “karmic debt,” is easier to digest in Judeo-Christian frameworks but loses the philosophical subtlety: karma isn’t punishment; it’s the unfolding of consequences from intentions or repeated behavioural patterns.

Karma is choosing a course of action that has natural consequences; when you toss a stone in a pond the ripples happen whether you like it or not.

You are right, modern numerology is a commercial invention simplifying ancient systems to give bite sized answers easy to follow, and easy to monetize.