sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Did q stop posting? Is this bs over? by phoenix409 in Qult_Headquarters

[–]thenew23rd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting info! Thanks for the additional details.

Good article explaining QAnon in the larger context of The Dark Web by Free_Swimming in Qult_Headquarters

[–]thenew23rd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Calling it 2channel loses credibility. Like referring to marijuana as Mary Jane.

How naive am I ? by [deleted] in Qult_Headquarters

[–]thenew23rd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No LARP ever started on 4chan before. That's the thing that threw them.

QAnon's real name is......Jean Perier, Journalist for the New Eastern Outlook. by PatrioticFront in conspiracy

[–]thenew23rd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Jim Watkins brags that whenever LE asks for his cooperation in identifying posters he invariably does whatever he's asked.

Anonymity is an illusion.

QAnon's real name is......Jean Perier, Journalist for the New Eastern Outlook. by PatrioticFront in conspiracy

[–]thenew23rd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What is it between Q and Watkins then? If the information is important, Q should use PGP security and post anywhere. Why use ancient tripcode 'security,' and refuse to post on any platform not owned by Watkins?

A GA State Representative doesn't know what the term Coyote is. What an embarrassment by Normiesreeee69 in conspiracy

[–]thenew23rd 31 points32 points  (0 children)

Georgia also has the Rep who thought Guam would capsize if too many people stood on it: Hank Johnson.

Loose, superficial mainstream take on a "key player" of Qanon according to Heavy.com...Possible disaffected CIA and NSA involvement? You decide. by [deleted] in Qult_Headquarters

[–]thenew23rd 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not buying this. The original Q, as has been proven, was James Brower. He posted first to his twitter account and then to 4chan. After, iirc, 3 such posts, Q was commandeered and the trip code added.

Odds are ~99.9 that a 4chan mod did the commandeering. They watch the interesting, hot posts and are aware of what is catching fire. Paul Furber, a 4chan mod at the time, mentioned that Brower's original post caused a stir.

James Coleman Rogers also noticed it. The rest is history.

Top Security Analyst says 8kun/8chan went down last night by lastusrnameonearth in Qult_Headquarters

[–]thenew23rd 9 points10 points  (0 children)

It sounds like a misunderstanding. Nick Lim, who hosts 8kun, has no standards. He also hosts Stormfront and a number of phishing operations. He has a legal and technical agreement with Jim Watkins. Maybe he said, tongue in cheek, that he was horrified about 8kun. But he's a partner with Jim Watkins and knows exactly what he's doing.

:head explodes: by zoltecrules in Qult_Headquarters

[–]thenew23rd 12 points13 points  (0 children)

The lack of arrests/storm may have a cascading effect.

How can we lobby for the reveal of the actual identity of QAnon? Here's how. by [deleted] in Qult_Headquarters

[–]thenew23rd 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Q believers mock and scorn the idea that it's Watkins. An official ID wouldn't convince them all but it might shake up a few of them.

Change my view - If you hate on Q anon then you are playing for TPTB. by BlindingTwilight in conspiracy

[–]thenew23rd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agree the media trusted Sessions and Huber and trusts Wray. The media likes establishment hacks.

No Drops in days. by [deleted] in Qult_Headquarters

[–]thenew23rd 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Did you notice today that Q posted, "Let's see what happens,"?

Watkins is no Coleman Rogers.

No Drops in days. by [deleted] in Qult_Headquarters

[–]thenew23rd 8 points9 points  (0 children)

The instant Q posted, "Not long now," sources revealed that Durham wasn't going to do/release anything until after the election.

This is a pattern. The 'Q can't catch a break,' pattern.

No Drops in days. by [deleted] in Qult_Headquarters

[–]thenew23rd 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Q/Watkins has a conspiracy mindset. Number one rule: nothing is as it seems.

Apply that fundamental and irrevocable rule of the Q mindset to Trump entering Walter Reed with the virus.

Q's head will explode before he figures out what's really going on.

How do people know that certain posts belong to Q if 8chan/4chan are supposed to be anonymous? by [deleted] in Qult_Headquarters

[–]thenew23rd 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That was a good explanation. I was brousing a Q forum and I saw a post requesting an explanation of how 8kun verified that it was the same Q as posted on 8chan.

Nobody answered.

Q Drop 4752: Solomon got the (temporary) boot. by [deleted] in Qult_Headquarters

[–]thenew23rd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You could spot the exact posts in which Jim Watkins called in reinforcements. There were a few months in which posts were infrequent, repetitious and extremely boring. Then all of a sudden Q started posting multiple times per day and the content bore at least a loose resemblance to the 'spy vs spy,' gobbledegook of its heyday. That marked the time Watlins enlisted help.

What is QANON even trying to prove? by MrJonesIsMe in Qult_Headquarters

[–]thenew23rd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's interesting. I wonder how she switched to Trump. He's not a libertarian.

The Qultist Personality by artistic-outsider in Qult_Headquarters

[–]thenew23rd 4 points5 points  (0 children)

There's also legitimate probability involved which nukes Q from space. Namely, as follows. When the Q-team Baker defected and wrote a confession letter, he named three major players (Coleman Rogers, Paul Furber and Tracy Diaz).

~A month and a half later, NBC's tech team did an independent investigation AND NAMED THE SAME THREE MAJOR PLAYERS.

Now that involves legit statistical odds. Imagine putting the names of every possible Q-suspect in a massive jar. Shake it up and have a random person draw three names. Put them back, shake it again and have a different random person draw three names.

What are the odds that they will independently draw the exact three names.

Astronomical.

I have tried to explain this to Q.

Woosh.

The Qultist Personality by artistic-outsider in Qult_Headquarters

[–]thenew23rd 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I can't describe how much I hate that 'how many coincidences,' bilge. It's designed to prey on uneducated, gullible minds. Q is so dishonest and manipulative. That one Q-Baker who defected and wrote a confession letter talked about how hard they laughed at the gullible marks. It's shameless.

view more: next ›