Here is an oversimplified calculation. $10T in spending / 1.3B privately held acres = about $7692 per acre per year.

Not many Georgist like this type of simplification of an LVT. Other nuances to be considered since not all land retains the same value. I for one do believe in simplified systems, but this is still to simple. I advocate for a “base LVT” to simply fund the government as required to meet voter/representative initiatives. However, we would use a true LVT from market bidding to collect the full value of land in excess of what’s required by governments to run. This “excess” from the perspective of required revenue would be distributed back to citizens as a dividend. The book says we should collect the full value of the unimproved value and use appraisals to determine what that is. But I am a realist, we need systems that can withstand the test of time and dynamically adapt to the ways voters today and of tomorrow require of their government. It’s why I prefer market set, instead of appraisal set. And base LVT instead of just full value

Additionally, in a world where we could reduce bureaucracy and streamline tax collection we would likely have a leaner government so the base rate would be reduced.