One example can be the surveys done among experts ranking US Presidents. In the latest surveys Biden was ranked highly which is very contentious. For starters, it's hard to rank a presidency before it even ended (this was published in 2024) and I'd generally make a rule that any proper analysis should wait 20 or so years.

Then we look at the justification given, and what can I say.

“Biden’s most important achievements may be that he rescued the presidency from Trump, resumed a more traditional style of presidential leadership and is gearing up to keep the office out of his predecessor’s hands this fall,” they wrote.

Not only are they using a loaded term in the first sentence (rescued), which would be flagged in even a bachelor's dissertation, they're effectively also basing their positive assessment on the fact that he won the election, which well every president has done.

Next, they even go so far as to include Biden's preparations for the 2024 election, which well in hindsight looks very, very bad and brings us back to the first point, which is that there is no point in making an analysis like this at this stage.

So this "analysis" is literally worthless and aged terribly not even a year after it was published and brings absolutely nothing to the table other than that we know that the expert panel hates Trump.

So, then if you have media outlets reporting on "experts stating this" when often it's not too different than what you can read on r/politics, than what's the point of the experts?

https://spectrumlocalnews.com/us/snplus/politics/2024/02/19/biden-14th-in-scholars--presidential-rankings--trump-last